Personnel Risk:

Low

Score:

79/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 58/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 75 / 100
Following the enactment of the 2016 Integrity Plan, there is a much clearer internal commitment to anti-corruption and integrity measures within the defence institutions.…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 75 / 100
The shift towards increased integrity and transparency is echoed in the defence sector’s approach to public discourse. In January 2018, the Minister of Defence,…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 25 / 100
Publications relating to the defence service echo the new integrity policy in the defence sector [1]. However, this new policy is more often mentioned…
Explore
Q35 88/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Law on Civil Servants [1] and the Criminal Code [2] are responsible for regulating and disciplining criminal activity in cases of bribery and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
There is no evidence of minor bribery or corruption cases in the Ministry of Defence and Army [1]. For instance, following media rumours in…
Explore
Q36 50/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 100 / 100
The Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers, Article 8, 9 and 10 provides protection related to all six components mentioned in the rubric, with…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 50 / 100
In the 2016 Integrity Plan, the Ministry of Defence explicitly aims to reduce the risks of corruption [1]. Moreover, the Plan follows the recommendations…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Since the enactment of the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers in 2016, no single application has been submitted by whistleblowers to the State…
Explore
Q37 58/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 50 / 100
Laws and By-laws specific to the defence sector (such as the Law on Defence, the Law on Service in the Armed Forces, the Collective…
Explore
Selection process Score: 75 / 100
According to the Law on Public Procurement, procurement personnel need to have a certificate to show the completion of organised by the Public Procurement…
Explore
Oversight Score: 50 / 100
The oversight of procurement procedures, in particular of the Ministry of Defence, and the appointment and promotion of personnel in confidential positions in this…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 75/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 25 / 100
The number of civilian and military personnel is stated in the White Paper on Defence [1]. The figures highlight the number, rank, gender and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The White Book of Defence [1] is available on the official web page of the MoD. The Annual Report on the Registry of Employees…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 100 / 100
There are no media or other reports (including official audits) which note the issue of ghost soldiers in the Army.
Explore
Q39 100/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 100 / 100
Pay rates, allowances and salaries for the Ministry of Defence and Army personnel are regulated by the Collective Agreement of the Ministry of Defence…
Explore
Allowances Score: 100 / 100
The criteria for allowances are determined by the Collective Agreement of the Ministry of Defence [1] which draws on the Law of Labor Relations…
Explore
Q40 100/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The Collective Agreement of the Ministry of Defence [1] and the Law on Army Service [2] stipulate that staff salaries are paid at least…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 100 / 100
All budget users receive their payments on time and these are accurate and correct, according to the Law on Payment of Wages [1]. The…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The payment system is openly published and the methodology for each pay bracket, salary calculation, allowances and so on are contained in the Collective…
Explore
Q41 58/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 100 / 100
The appointment of the highest positions in the Army of the North Macedonia (officers with a general rank) is coordinated by the President of…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Formally, appointments to high profile positions are subject to external scrutiny. The Parliament, in accordance with the Law on Defence (Article 17) is also…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The formal requirements for any appointment are made public and outlined in the Law on Service in the Army [1] and the Rulebook on…
Explore
Q42 81/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 100 / 100
The process of promotion takes place in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Service in the Army [1] and a special Rulebook…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 75 / 100
The Law on Service in the Army outlines the procedure for promotion in exceptional circumstances, for instance during war (Article 68) [1]. The Rulebook…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Details of promotions, however, are regularly and publicly announced to the relevant unit in which the promotion is taking place [1]. As for promotions…
Explore
Frequency Score: 100 / 100
The details of staff appointments are not publicly disclosed, because they represent classified information. Details of promotions, however, are regularly and publicly announced to…
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Over the period of 2006 – 2007, the Army of the North Macedonia became fully professional [1].…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Over the period of 2006 – 2007, the Army of the North Macedonia became fully professional [1].…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Over the period of 2006 – 2007, the Army of the North Macedonia became fully professional [1].…
Explore
Q44 88/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
There is no explicit policy with regards to refusing bribes for professional roles. In general, however, both the Law on Service in the Army…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
The Law on Army Service stipulates the sanctions for bribery range from 10-30 percent salary cuts, a ban on promotion to higher ranks for…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. Formal mechanisms for sanctions are in place, but so far no cases of corrupt behaviour such as…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 100/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
The chains of command are separated from payment processes. The Finance Directorates of the Ministry of Defence and the Army are responsible for paying…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 75/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 100 / 100
In November 2017, the Minister of Defence adopted a Code of Ethics for the employees of the Ministry of Defence and the Army [1].…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Code of Ethics is publicly available and published on the Ministry of Defence website [1]. Together with other measures for building integrity, including…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
According to an interview, breaches of the code are only occassionally investigated [1]. The Code is not so much designed to punish as to…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
Guidance on the code of conduct is available to all military personnel, although it is not part of induction training. The training is done…
Explore
Q47 75/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 100 / 100
The Code of Ethics for the employees of the Ministry of Defence and the Army, introduced in November 2017 [1] also applies to civilian…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The Code of Ethics is publicly available and published on the Ministry of Defence website [1]. Together with other measures for building integrity, including…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
According to an interview, breaches of the code are only occassionally investigated [1]. The Code is not so much designed to punish as to…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
Guidance on the code of conduct is available to all military personnel, but is not part of induction training. The training is more linked…
Explore
Q48 75/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
In 2016, a NATO Mobile Training Team conducted a “Building integrity in peacekeeping operations Course“. During the same year, 27 employees took part to…
Explore
Regularity Score: 50 / 100
How regularly anti-corruption training takes place is unclear. According to a high Ministry of Defence official, there are different types of anti-corruption trainings for…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: 75 / 100
The MoD indicates that both domestic and international anti-corruption trainings are open to every rank. Further the pool of experts includes 5 officers (major…
Explore
Q49 75/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 50 / 100
Formally, there is no specific policy regarding the publication of corrupt activities. However, over the past few years, the Ministry of Defence has openly…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
According the Law on Criminal Procedure [1], all outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities are archived on the Criminal…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The case of the former Prime Minister and Defence Minister Vlado Buckovski was lengthy and complex, and saw a delayed prosecution. Buckovski was originally…
Explore
Q50 100/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Corrupt payments are criminalised by the Criminal Code [1]. Articles 257 and 358 highlight the illegal nature of asking and receiving gifts in financial,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence of corrupt payments by or to the Ministry of Defence or Army employees…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of corrupt payments by or to Ministry of Defence or Army employees [1] It would seem, based on the above…
Explore