Operational Risk:

High

Score:

33/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Poland Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
In February 2016, the “Anti-corruption Program in the Ministry of National Defence for 2016-2019” [1] was introduced, but the program is not part of…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that military doctrine considers corruption a strategic issue for operations, as such this indicator is scored Not Applicable.
Explore
Q52 100/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
In 2017, a course entitled “Anti-corruption prophylaxis” – which includes a minimum of 8 hours of training – was introduced to the training programmes…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
Corruption is taken into account in military activities, but there is no evidence that it is considered a strategic issue in the forward planning…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
As noted in 53A, corruption is not recognised as a strategic issue in military operations. As background information, in 2016 Poland sent about 1,400…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 25/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Polish military contingents takes part in various international operations, training and peace keeping missions of NATO, EU, UN and international coalitions. [1, 2] There…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 50 / 100
Polish military contingents takes part in various international operations, training and peace keeping missions of NATO, EU, UN and international coalitions. [1,2] Commands of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
No evidence has been found on the deployment of anti-corruption specialists (other than Military Police and Military Counterintelligence Service officers) or publicly available reports.…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 38/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
In April 2019 MoD issued recommendations for reducing corruption risk in public procurements awarded during operations and peacekeeping missions. [1] It is worth noting,…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The Inspectorate of Support for the Armed Forces is responsible, among others, for contracting in operations. There are examples of anti-corruption training provided for…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Commercial security activity is licensed. The Act on Measures of Direct Coercion and Firearms…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Private security companies (“Specialized Armed Security Formations”) are licensed and scrutinised by the Ministry…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ministry of Interior has clear rules of scrutiny which may abolish licenses. The…
Explore