Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

0/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Sudan Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found that corruption is addressed as a strategic issue in defence doctrine or documents or that it is indeed a…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Sudan has no military doctrine that considers corruption as a specific strategic issue for operations.
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found suggesting that Sudan’s military commanders or senior police officials are required to receive training on corruption issues or that…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found suggesting that Sudan’s military commanders or senior police officials aim to incorporate any principles or activities for corruption prevention…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found suggesting that Sudan’s military commanders or senior police officials mitigate corruption during the implementation of operations. Instead, for years,…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found suggesting that Sudan’s civilian government or military has deployed any trained professionals to monitor corruption, either formally or informally.…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found suggesting that Sudan has produced and/or directed the use of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) guidance to monitor corruption risks…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Sudan does not deploy any expert personnel for corruption monitoring. No reports resulting from corruption monitoring missions…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Most Sudanese forces – such as those previously operating in Yemen and Libya – are deployed through highly opaque arrangements that themselves entail or…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
Most Sudanese forces – such as those previously operating in Yemen and Libya – are deployed through highly opaque arrangements that themselves entail or…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No formal policy could be found regarding private military contractor (PMC) employment by Sudan…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. PMCs, including the Russian Wagner Group and several paramilitary organisations that have historically received…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. A review of the websites run by the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Defence…
Explore