Personnel Risk:

Critical

Score:

12/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 0/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 0 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence and Interior did not yield any evidence of internal communications about civilian or military…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 0 / 100
The head and deputy head of Sudan’s Sovereign Council are military figures who head the SAF and the RSF respectively. The head of the…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found on the websites operated by Sudan’s Ministries of Defence or Interior [1,2] – or in news media on the…
Explore
Q35 13/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 25 / 100
According to Global Integrity, Sudan’s Criminal Act of 1991 [1] criminalises active and passive bribery (Art. 88), extortion (Art. 176) and ‘criminal breach of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
A Freedom House 2020 report reads: ‘members of the al-Bashir government who engaged in bribery during his rule have escaped scrutiny in 2019, with…
Explore
Q36 0/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 0 / 100
Citing sources that themselves ultimately reference Sudan’s criminal code, GAN Integrity reported in 2016 that whistleblowers in Sudan are protected when reporting corruption [1].…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 0 / 100
In a report on the Bashir regime, Global Integrity stated: ‘There is no independent body mandated to receive and investigate cases of alleged public…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Given the complicity of the military’s leadership in corruption, internal reports of corruption would only be tolerated (or possibly even be considered ‘corruption’ by…
Explore
Q37 0/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 0 / 100
To the extent that the government recognises that certain positions may be more open to corruption opportunities than others, the fact that Sudan’s government…
Explore
Selection process Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable. To the extent that the government recognises that certain positions may be more open to corruption opportunities than…
Explore
Oversight Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable. To the extent that the government recognises that certain positions may be more open to corruption opportunities than…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 0/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 0 / 100
A 2020 report published by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies notes that both Sudan’s current Constitution and the Juba Peace Agreement ‘narrowly define…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
No officially reported cumulative number of civilian and military personnel could be found via an internet search, which included a review of the Ministry…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: NEI / 100
There is Not Enough Information to score this indicator. Since there is no reliable information about the number of soldiers in Sudan’s militarised forces,…
Explore
Q39 0/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 0 / 100
It was not possible to find any reliable information about pay rates. In any case, rates for more senior officers wouldn’t include reference to…
Explore
Allowances Score: 0 / 100
A review of the Ministry of Defence website (which is not in operation) did not yield any evidence that information on allowances is publicly…
Explore
Q40 17/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 50 / 100
According to an expert on Sudan’s defence sector, the Army has almost always paid on time, but the police less so [1]. He said…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 0 / 100
In his report on Sudan’s political marketplace, De Waal explains that SAF soldiers are paid through regular army channels, while RSF commanders receive cash…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence, Interior and Finance [1,2,3], as well as an internet search, suggests that the payment…
Explore
Q41 0/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 0 / 100
A report published by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies in November 2020 observes that, while ‘the Sudan Peace Agreement emphasises building a professional…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The Armed Forces Act of 2007 specifies only that the President shall appoint officers [1]. In such a case, even Parliament could only call…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
No information about appointment processes could be found on the websites of the Ministries of Defence and Interior [1,2]. The Armed Forces Act of…
Explore
Q42 0/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 0 / 100
Article 21 (1) of the Sudan Armed Forces Act, 2007, reads: ‘Promotions of officers shall be made by decision of the President of the…
Explore
Exceptions Score: NEI / 100
There is Not Enough Information to score this indcator as no information could be found to support a reliable answer to this question. Given…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
No information could be found during a search of the websites of Sudan’s Ministry of Defence or Ministry of Interior [1,2], nor during an…
Explore
Frequency Score: NA / 100
No information about postings or promotions could be found during a search of the websites of Sudan’s Ministry of Defence or Ministry of Interior…
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 63/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 50 / 100
Sudan’s Criminal Act of 1991 defines bribery as a punishable offence across and throughout the government, but is not specific to the defence and…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Though no specific reference is made to bribery, the 1992 National Service Act [1] enables the assignment of penalties as follows: imprisonment for up…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There was insufficient information about the extent to which sanctions are applied in the event of conscription-related bribery to assess a score for this…
Explore
Q44 67/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 75 / 100
A search of the websites of the Ministries of Defence and Interior did not yield any reference to a policy or rule specifically against…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence and Interior [1,2], as well as the Armed Forces Act [3], suggests that there…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
A review of the websites of the Ministries of Defence and Interior [1,2] does not yield any evidence that the ministries are concerned about…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 0/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The SAF pays through regular army channels (payroll), while RSF commanders receive and disburse their troops’ salaries in hard currency [1]. Please also see…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 0/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found that a Code of Conduct specifically for military personnel existed during the Bashir regime or exists for military personnel…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no available evidence that the SAF has a Code of Conduct and if there is such a document, it is not published…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no available evidence that the SAF has a Code of Conduct and if there is…
Explore
Training Score: NA / 100
There is likely no training available with respect to a relevant Code of Conduct because there is no available evidence that the SAF has…
Explore
Q47 0/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found of a Code of Conduct that civilian personnel must agree to follow. However, the Sudanese Criminal Act of 1991…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
No evidence could be found of a Code of Conduct that civilian personnel must agree to follow. This indicator is therefore marked Not Applicable…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
No evidence could be found of a Code of Conduct that civilian personnel must agree to follow. This indicator is therefore marked Not Applicable…
Explore
Training Score: NA / 100
No evidence could be found of a Code of Conduct that civilian personnel must agree to follow. This indicator is therefore marked Not Applicable…
Explore
Q48 0/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
A search of the websites of the Ministries of Defence and Interior [1,2], as well as a broader internet search, yielded no evidence that…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
No evidence could be found that the government proactively provides anti-corruption training to any of its defence or security personnel. As such, this indicator…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: NA / 100
No evidence could be found that the government proactively provides anti-corruption training to any of its defence or security personnel. As such, this indicator…
Explore
Q49 8/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found that the Bashir regime or its Ministry of Defence had a written policy to make information about defence-related and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Information on prosecutions is not made publicly available as a matter of routine, but rather selectively, when the release of such information is intended…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
A 2020 report by Bertelsmann Stiftung summarised that ‘accusations of corruption are used as a political instrument to arrest and prosecute persons who have…
Explore
Q50 33/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
GAN Integrity’s Sudan report reads: ‘Active and passive bribery, gifts and facilitation payments are prohibited in the public sector’. However, this is not specific…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
GAN Integrity’s report on Sudan reads: ‘Active and passive bribery, gifts and facilitation payments are prohibited in the public sector, but enforcement is weak……
Explore
Prevalence Score: 0 / 100
GAN Integrity’s report on Sudan reads: ‘Public servants are known to demand extra facilitation payments for services that individuals or companies are legally entitled…
Explore