Political Risk:

High

Score:

40/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 50/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
The Parliament has formal powers to approve or veto laws on security. The Constitution provides that the structure of the army is organised in…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The Parliament debates and reviews defence policy and attempts to influence policy through formal mechanisms. First, the Parliament includes two dedicated defence and security…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. According to our sources, there is a kind of passive…
Explore
Q2 30/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
There are two defence committees within the Assembly of People’s Representatives : i) A permanent committte named ” Organisation of the the administration and…
Explore
Expertise Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, most of all of the members of the Defence and Security committees have little expertise in the defence sector(1). Its…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 0 / 100
The two defence committees appear to fail to review major defence policies and decisions. The review of the activity report of the committee (1)…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
The activity of the Security and Defence committee has mostly been about questioning the Ministers of the Interior and Defence along with retired officers…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there are no long term investigations with a focus on the defence and security sector. The reason behind that is…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable as there are no recommendations from the committee, and therefore, there is no possible way to take…
Explore
Q3 31/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, the legislative council have on many occasions debated the defence and security policy, however, these debates were not in-depth and…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is a variety of levels of discussion that range from superficial to real debates on serious issues( terrorism). These…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, until today, the experience of Tunis is to keep discussions and debates on military and security within the official and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Some information relating to the security strategy is made public. The National strategy on combating extremism and terrorism which contains some elements about how…
Explore
Q4 25/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 25 / 100
There is an informal policy that requires defence and security institutions to be open towards CSOs and the establishment of mechanisms to that end.…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 25 / 100
Although there is a range of protections thanks to the Decree n°2011-88 of 24 September 2011 on the organisation of associations, CSOs still have…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
According to our resources, there are attempts to have a consistent policy of openness towards the public, NGOs and local communities, however, it is…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Tunisia is not a significant defence exporter (1). Tunisia signed the UNCAC on 30 March 2004 and ratified it on 23 September 2008 (2)
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
There are shortcomings in complying with some parts of the Convention. In 2014, 16 gaps were identified by the team responsible for self-assessment of…
Explore
Q6 38/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, the debate and deliberations are only restricted to specific groups of people such as academics, activists and NGOs. These debates…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, the MoD and armed forces in Tunis engage in irregular debates with certain NGOs and groups of people. Sometimes, the…
Explore
Q7 75/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
Tunisia adopted a national strategy for good governance and fighting corruption (2016-2020) and an action plan (2017-2018) in December 2016 (1). The charter of…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is an action plan within the Tunisian National Strategy for Good Governance and Fighting Corruption. The action plan, whilst…
Explore
Q8 50/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is a unit in every governmental institute which has the responsibility to fight corruption and enhance integrity. These units…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, the central governance units are independent and do not belong to the chain of the commander. However, these units are…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. According to our sources, the units are new and in…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. According to the Arab Barometer of 2016, 35% of Tunisians trust the Government to…
Explore
Q10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there are no defence-specific assessments of corruption risk. The MoD does not consider corruption as a great risk and therefore…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no evidence of the existence of defence-specific assessments of corruption risk.
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable because there is no evidence of the existence of defence-specific assessments of corruption risk.
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 42/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 50 / 100
There is a clear process for acquisition planning in place. According to Decree n°1039-2014 dated 13 March 2014, Organising Public Procurement, the public purchaser…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, there is limited information available for the public or oversight agencies on the acquisition and acquisition planning, this information is…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
Oversight mechanisms exist during the annual budget preparation process and involve specialised departments from the Ministry of Finance and the Presidency of Government. When…
Explore
Q12 63/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, the MoD budget is published in advance to the legislative and to the public for debate, however, it is not…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The Constitution states that “the draft finance law shall be presented to the Assembly no later than October 15 and it shall be adopted…
Explore
Q13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
According to our sources, the Tunisian Parliament has more than one committee that have the right to scrutinise all matters related to the budget…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 25 / 100
Legally, the defence and security committee has the right to scrutinise and analyse the budget, however, in practice evidence of effective scrutiny could not…
Explore
Q14 50/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, the defence budget is published with very limited information. All data on the civil side of the MoD is published,…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, the MoD and MoF do not publish detailed information about the approved budget concerning the armed forces. In general, the…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is a change in the last few years about the capacity to access information related to the defence sector.…
Explore
Q15 42/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, the non-central Government funds are registered and shown in the budget. However, this data is not published in detailed formats(1,2,3).…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
According to chapters 3 and 4 of Law n°42- 2004 dated the 13/05/2004 “organic budget law”, these sources of income are subject to the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there is no public interest in the non-central Government income to MoD, and therefore no scrutiny or public oversight(1,2,3). It…
Explore
Q16 33/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
According to our sources, there are two types of internal auditing process: the general inspector of the armed forces, and the auditing unit of…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there is a very limited oversight mechanism in place for sensitive data, and most of the active oversight is related…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a scoe due to insufficient information or evidence. According to our sources, there is a high probability (not…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, the MoD tries to meet the recommendations and to change according to critique, but it is not always able to…
Explore
Q17 25/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
Three entities are tasked with ensuring external auditing of public expenditure in Tunisia: Public Services General Control (Presidency of Government), Finances General Control (Ministry…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, the oversight and external entities that have the mandate to scrutinise the MoD are independent however, they are not financially…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, the reports of the external auditing of the MoD are not published for security reasons due to the confidentiality of…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, the MoD tried to meet the recommendations of the external and internal audits but did so irregularly. It is based…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 92/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Defence institutions are, by constitutional means, prohibited from having controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation (1,2). Armed forces…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
According to our sources, there has been no case where the MoD or the armed forces have had any business or commercial interest in…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
According to our sources, there could be rare cases of high profile officers who may own businesses and have financial interests, but these are…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there are no financial interests and commercial enterprises managed and owned by the MoD or the armed…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there are no declared financial interests of the MoD, and so there is no public scrutiny of…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 100/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
According to our sources, there is very little organised crime within the armed forces. The army and the MoD initiate and tackle any suspicion…
Explore
Government response Score: 100 / 100
Although there is a very low likelihood of organised crime, the MoD and the armed forces work effectively to tackle any possible practices of…
Explore
Q20 25/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is a specialised unit within the armed forces, under the general inspector supervision that has the capacity to investigate…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, these units are not financially independent and are headed by the executive of the MoD (Minister). Therefore, it is possible…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
According to our sources, there are superficial hearings and investigations yet, there is a low likelihood of cases within the armed forces leading to…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, Tunis has no law that governs the intelligence services, except for one 2014 decree that gave an independent reveiw of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
As there are no oversight mechanism, this sub indicator is NA.
Explore
Q22 17/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there are no clear criteria for the appointment of senior positions within the intelligence services. The appointment of senior positions…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, the appointment of a senior position is based on two main factors: professional criteria and loyalty to the executives. The…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
According to our sources, there is a committee usually formed by the President and the Prime Minister to nominate a few people for appointment…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 0/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 0 / 100
Tunisia has not signed the ATT (1).
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Tunisia has not signed the ATT (1).
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Tunisia does not export any arms or military equipment (as shown through SIPRI data) (1) and there…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
According to our sources, there are no regulations or laws that regulate the work of lobbying organisations or lobbyists in Tunis. This is because…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable, as there are no laws that regulate lobbying defence institutions, and so there is no public information published…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable, as there are no laws that regulate lobbying defence institutions, and so there is no public information published…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable, as there are no laws that regulate lobbying defence institutions, and so there is no public information published…
Explore