Personnel Risk:

Moderate

Score:

60/100

Collapse
34 67/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 100 / 100
The issue of corruption within the Ugandan military is a recurring theme, evidenced by the frequent warnings issued by both the Commander-in-Chief, President Museveni,…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs is demonstrably engaged in internal efforts to combat corruption, as evidenced by Mrs. Buturo’s caution to protocol…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 50 / 100
The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) demonstrates a degree of transparency by openly acknowledging and addressing corruption within its ranks, as evidenced by the…
Explore
35 63/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) asserts a strict stance against corruption, underpinned by a zero-tolerance policy and legal frameworks designed to ensure accountability.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Strong measures are in place when dealing with corruption and other related crimes. Uganda’s military has a robust legal framework to sanction corruption. However,…
Explore
36 42/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 75 / 100
The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2010 protects whistleblowers who report corrupt officials and their deals. Legislation on whistleblowing and reporting corruption exists and is…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 50 / 100
The Inspectorate of Government has power to investigate or cause investigation, arrest or cause arrest, prosecute or cause prosecution, make orders and give directions…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
A significant obstacle to effectively combating corruption within the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) is the prevailing lack of trust among officials and personnel…
Explore
37 17/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 0 / 100
Article 8, Section J of the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) Act 2005, establishes a crucial power dynamic within the military structure by granting…
Explore
Selection process Score: 25 / 100
Officials are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest, and clear procedures are in place to resolve such conflicts. This includes prohibiting officials from…
Explore
Oversight Score: 25 / 100
The UPDF High Command oversees the appointment process, ensuring adherence to guidelines and regulations while the Leadership Code Act of 2002 mandates the declaration…
Explore
38 17/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 25 / 100
The number of personnel on the UPDF is not publicly disclosed for security reasons [1]. However, the number of active personnel is estimated to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The number of personnel on the UPDF is not publicly disclosed for security reasons, but estimates f active and reserve personnel for the UPDF.…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 0 / 100
There are reports and allegations of ghost soldiers in the UPDF. President Museveni while on a tour of Karamoja region was confronted with new…
Explore
39 50/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 50 / 100
The salary scale for military personnel is known and when their remuneration is increased is also published. The allowances are established in the sixth…
Explore
Allowances Score: 50 / 100
Standing Instruction number 6 of 2018, issued by the Ministry of Public Service, provides significant update on the allowance structure for all public officers,…
Explore
40 67/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 75 / 100
The government has implemented an electronic payment system to facilitate timely and transparent salary payments. Salaries are processed and paid by the 28th of…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 75 / 100
The UPDF has made significant efforts in the payment of salaries of its personnel. The UPDF uses the Integrated Personnel and Payroll System(IPPS) to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Since 2014, the government of Uganda implemented the decentralised salary payment processing guidelines through the Integrated Personnel and Payroll System (IPPS) which has significantly…
Explore
41 33/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 50 / 100
While the UPDF has established a structured promotion system with clearly defined criteria and legal frameworks, the practical application of these processes does not…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The UPDF Act sets clear provisions for promotions in the army. The UPDF Act does not provide any provisions for external scrutiny. All the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The Uganda Peoples’ Defence Forces (UPDF) outlines its promotion and appointment procedures within the Uganda Peoples’ Defence Forces Act, 2005. Sections 55 to 64…
Explore
42 69/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 50 / 100
While the UPDF Act establishes a formal promotion process, the reality is that these processes are not always strictly adhered to, primarily due to…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 50 / 100
The promotion system of the UPDF while grounded in the UPDF Act 2005, operates within a framework that grants significant discretionary power to the…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The UPDF personnel promotions are detailed including name, rank, new post and effective date promotion. The major difference between the civilian agencies and the…
Explore
Frequency Score: 100 / 100
The promotions in the UPDF vary based on factors like performance, vacancies, and organisational need.[1] For example, this year there have been 2 promotions…
Explore
43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
Uganda does not have compulsory conscription. The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) is a voluntary force, and recruitment is based on willing applicants meeting…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
The UPDF Act, 2005 provides for the mobilization of reserves or civilians in times of national security threats, but there is no standing law…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
The UPDF Act, 2005 provides for the mobilization of reserves or civilians in times of national security threats, but there is no standing law…
Explore
44 83/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
Section 176 of the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) Act 2005 focuses on fraudulent offences. Subsection (b) states that a person subject to military…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Section 176 (c) of the UPDF Act 2005 states that any person who receives directly or indirectly, whether personally or by or through any…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
The UPDF has made notable progress in enforcing sanctions against corruption, particularly in personnel postings, fostering a more transparent and merit-based system. For instance,…
Explore
45 100/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
The chain of command and chain of payment are separate to ensure accountability, transparency, and efficiency [1]. According to the Government of Uganda’s Guidelines…
Explore
46 56/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
Section 118 (1) of the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) Act mandates a code of conduct, detailed in the Seventh Schedule, to govern the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The UPDF code of conduct is transparent, written in clear language, and regularly updated to reflect changes in laws and operational requirements. However, a…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
The UPDF personnel receive regular training on the code of conduct. Commanders are held responsible for ensuring their personnel adhere to the UPDF code…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The Seventh Schedule of the UPDF Act states that the Code of Conduct is a central component in the training of military personnel at…
Explore
47 56/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
​The “Code of Conduct and Ethics for Uganda Public Service,” dated July 2005, serves as a comprehensive guide for public officers in Uganda, outlining…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Code of Conduct and Ethics for Uganda Public Service is intended to be distributed to all civil servants at their first appointment and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
The ghost pilot case within the UPDAF stands as a stark example of alleged systemic corruption involving the creation and prolonged maintenance of a…
Explore
Training Score: 75 / 100
The Uganda Public Service Standing Order states that the performance and competency gaps identified during the performance appraisal process shall form the basis for…
Explore
48 75/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) and civilian personnel in the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs (MoDVA) do receive anti-corruption training, though it…
Explore
Regularity Score: 75 / 100
Anti-corruption training is included in training programs for all recruits. Personnel deployed in UN and AU missions receive specific anti-corruption training, and high-ranking personnel,…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: 100 / 100
All recruits of the UPDF receive training in anticorruption. Senior officers receive tailored training on leadership and integrity. Senior army officers received training on…
Explore
49 83/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
UPDF Act (2005) mandates publication of court-martial proceedings and outcomes. The UPDF also publishes annual reports and occasional press releases on anticorruption on its…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Transparency is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the defence services and promoting accountability for corrupt activities. The UPDF publishes annual reports and occasional…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The effectiveness of making public the outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities can serve as a deterrence to corruption.[1]…
Explore
50 75/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Section 176 (b) of the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) Act 2005 states that a person who is subject to military law who improperly…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
The UPDF court martial serves as the primary judicial body for these cases, imposing penalties that range from imprisonment to dismissal[1]. Within the UPDF,…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 50 / 100
The prevalence of facilitation payments in the UPDF is difficult to quantify due to the secretive nature of such transactions [1][4]. The UPDF also…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Leadership Behaviour

Expand
Q34 NA/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Q35 NA/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Q36 NA/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Q37 NA/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 NA/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Q39 NA/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Q40 NA/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Q41 NA/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Q42 NA/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Q44 NA/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 NA/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 NA/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Q47 NA/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Q48 NA/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Q49 NA/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Q50 NA/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question