Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

26/100

Collapse
57 25/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act (2014) and the Public Procurement…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
The PPDA Act (2003) allows the Defence and National Security Organs to manage their procurement and disposal based on a dual list. It also…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The PPDA sets terms under which the Defence and National Security Organs shall agree annually with the PPDA on the category of restricted items…
Explore
58 33/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
The Procurement and Disposal Unit department is tasked with sourcing and acquiring a wide range of military equipment, weapons, vehicles, ammunition, and other essential…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The PPDA Act mandates all ministries to be transparent. Although some aspects of the defence procurement cycle are disclosed (weapons, vehicles and other essential…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
The MoDVA uses the local media when calling for open bids. There are also adverts on the website of the UPDF. Policies and procedures…
Explore
59 50/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
There are formalised independent oversight bodies which oversee procurement activities in the Ministry of Defence. These include the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The PPDA Act (Cap. 205) establishes PPDA as the principal regulator, issuing rules and overseeing compliance across MDAs, including MoDVA. PPDA continues to update…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Oversight of defence procurement in Uganda is carried out by multiple institutions — the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority (PPDA), the…
Explore
60 25/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The limited public availability of UPDF policies, coupled with the outdated nature of the 2004 white paper on defence transformation, creates a significant challenge…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There are few notices of planned purchases, but details of planned purchases are not made public because they are classified [2]. In Uganda, potential…
Explore
61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
Defence purchases are not made public because most of the time these purchases fall under classified budget/expenditure. MoDVA does not publish aggregated figures for…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
The absence of disaggregated information on UPDF expenditure, particularly concerning military purchases, is a significant obstacle to transparency and public accountability. The classification of…
Explore
62 50/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 75 / 100
Section 70 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act (PPDA) provides the basic qualifications of bidders. It states that a procuring…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 25 / 100
The classification of military purchases often allows the UPDF to bypass standard procurement procedures, citing national security concerns. This effectively renders the PPDA guidelines…
Explore
63 8/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
The inherent tension between national security imperatives and transparent procurement practices creates an environment where adherence to established guidelines can be selectively applied. The…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The Parliamentary Committee of Defence & Internal Affairs scrutinises the accounts of the MoDVA. For instance, this information is captured in the report of…
Explore
Purchases Score: 25 / 100
The PPDA Act governs procurement processes of purchases by the UPDF. The Defence Forces Standing Orders contain internal regulations governing UPDF procurement. However, urgent…
Explore
64 13/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
Most defence procurements are often made through single sourcing, without competition. This means that contracts are awarded to a preferred supplier or contractor without…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
The PPDA conducts procurement and disposal audits, which extend to classified expenditure within the MoDVA is a crucial oversight mechanism. The submission of these…
Explore
65 44/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
Section 37 (6) of the PPDA Act, mandates the Evaluation Committee members to sign a Code of Ethics and declare the absence of conflicts…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
The PPDA Act and Regulations require procuring entities to maintain a complete audit trail documenting all stages of the procurement process — from needs…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority (PPDA) requires all public procurement entities, including the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs (MoDVA),…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The involvement of the Auditor General’s office and the PPDA in auditing and reviewing UPDF procurement processes provides a layer of robust external verification.…
Explore
66 50/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Section 95, (1a) of the PPDA Act states that a person who— (d) connives or colludes to commit a fraudulent act or a corrupt…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
Section 94 of the PPDA Act (2003) [1] provides for the suspension of providers. It states that the Authority may on the recommendation of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
The PPDA has the mandate to regulate and enforce procurement regulations in all government entities including the UPDF. However, the extent of enforcement by…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The UPDF has taken steps to improve the professionalism of its procurement staff by participating in training programs run by the PPDA and international…
Explore
67 38/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
Section 93(2) of the PPDA Act, states that all providers of works, services, or supplies shall be required to sign a declaration of compliance…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The maintenance of records by the PPDA that includes UPDF contracts is a step towards transparency. However, UPDF contracts often involve sensitive information related…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
The PPDA conducts periodic procurement and contract audits, including in the MoDVA, to assess compliance with contractual terms and value for money. Its 2023…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Under Uganda’s PPDA framework, breaches of contract (non-delivery, substandard performance, misrepresentation) are first handled by the procuring entity through its internal structures (Contracts Committee,…
Explore
68 58/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
The PPDA Act provides a structured administrative review process for bidders who believe that a procuring and disposing entity (PDE) has breached procurement laws,…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 25 / 100
The PPDA complaints handling mechanism provides companies with an avenue to raise concerns about procurement processes, while the Inspectorate of Government’s whistleblower protection mechanism…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
Retaliation against companies that file complaints or report malpractices in procurement, including UPDF procurement, can take various forms, such as blacklisting, debarment from future…
Explore
69 67/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Section 95 of PPDA, (1c-1g) lays out the sanctions available to the procuring and disposing entity. The guidelines empower procurement officials to exclude companies…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
Independent oversight bodies like PPDA and Inspectorate of Government can investigate and recommend sanctions [1]. The Inspectorate of Government has investigated several corruption cases…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 50 / 100
The regulatory framework of the PPDA including sanctions for companies and a publicly available list of suspended entities, represents a positive step towards ensuring…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework or policy covering offset contracts in Uganda [1] [2].
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
There is no explicit legal or policy framework in Uganda that establishes offset-specific anti-corruption due diligence requirements. The UPDF Act and MoDVA procurement regulations…
Explore
71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are no legislation, policies and procedures dealing with offset contracts in Uganda or outlining the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts [1][2].
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
It is the Auditor General’s Office that conducts an audit to ensure transparency and accountability in government contracts, including offset contracts. However, there was…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There was no information found on any monitoring concerning offset contracts in the official Auditor General’s Annual Reports to the Parliament [1]. Interviews conducted…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of offset contracts identified in the Auditor General’s annual reports or any public information[1]. Therefore, breaches of contract are not…
Explore
72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Offset contracts are not conducted as open competition, as there is no formal framework governing offset contracts, and defence procurement practices often lack transparency.…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no policy regulating the use of agents. However, the use of intermediaries cannot be ruled out in procurement processes. Several proxy companies…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
The government does not have a policy regulating the use of agents [1][2]. Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
In the budget framework paper for the MoDVA, there is listing of purchase of items such as worth Ushs 91bn were acquired to ease…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
While there’s no documented case of a defence procurement directly bypassing oversight due to political pressure, the broader context strongly suggests risk. Reports show…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ugandan government does not publicly disclose or justify its decisions regarding arms procurement…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no documented evidence of defence acquisitions in Uganda being explicitly granted due…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question