Political Risk:

High

Score:

48/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 33/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Parliament and its committees have powers to make laws, approve budgets, invite or summon government officials to appear, give evidence and respond to questions…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Parliament has tried to use its powers in certain cases, but they are very limited because its resolutions are non-binding on the executive based…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There have been many confrontational engagements between the Parliament and the executive. However, the executive has always had their way. Therefore, there is a…
Explore
Q2 58/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
The committee on defence and internal affairs considers policies and budgets of the defence sector. It also has the power to scrutinise any aspect…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
The current composition of the Committee on Defence and Internal Affairs has a serving army officer at the rank of Brigadier General, Felix Kulaigye…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 50 / 100
The Committee on Defence and Internal Affairs rarely disagrees with decisions of the sector and makes a few adjustments in the proposed budget allocations…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
Though the Committee on Defence and Internal Affairs does not issue amendments to budgets and recommendations monthly, it gives definite timeframes within which ministries…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
The Committee on Defence and Internal Affairs conducts long term investigations on current activities, including unclassified operations [1]. However, only activities and operations that…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
Ministries only incorporate recommendations depending on their impact on improving security but ignore those that call for more disclosure of what is deemed classified.…
Explore
Q3 44/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
There are a few instances where debates on defence policy take place on the floor of Parliament and at the executive [1]. However, on…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs (MoDVA) has often informed the Parliament and the country, in general, of imminent security threats [1]. The…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 25 / 100
The defence sector, has in the last five years, held formal consultations which it has called annual review meetings. However, participants at these meetings…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
There is a low level of transparency in the sector because the public is usually given partial information in the guise of not exposing…
Explore
Q4 50/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 50 / 100
There is a clear policy of openness when dealing with the CSOs by the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs (MoDVA) [1, 2]. However,…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Access to Information Act, the NGO Act protect freedom of assembly, freedom of association, access to information.…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
The MoDVA and security institutions have started seeking engagements from CSOs on a range of issues, but they do not discuss corruption. The ministry…
Explore
Q5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Uganda signed and ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) on September 9, 2004. Uganda is not a major defence exporter [1]. Much…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
Though the United Nation Office of Drugs and Crime 2017 Report on the state of implementation of the UNCAC does not specifically address Uganda’s…
Explore
Q6 63/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 75 / 100
Academics, journalists, CSOs and other actors, including politicians, political and security analysts, former security officers discuss defence issues amongst themselves regularly on talk shows…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
The government engages in public discussions about defence issues on both public and private media platforms, some government officials participate on panel discussions and…
Explore
Q7 25/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
The country does not have an anti-corruption policy. However, some laws apply to the defence sector, including Section 118 of the Ugandan People’s Defence…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 0 / 100
Uganda does have an anti-corruption policy that applies to all government ministries. It has a comprehensive anti-corruption legal framework that is provided by the…
Explore
Q8 50/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 50 / 100
Anti-corruption agencies such as the office of the auditor-general and Inspectorate of Government (IG) [1, 2] and the disciplinary units in the defence sector…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
Compliance and ethics units in the defence sector are in place such as the unit Disciplinary Committee, the General Court Martial and Court Martial…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
According to the Daily Monitor [1], the staff are aware of the corruption risks, but they are unable to address them through their work…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Inspector General of Government’s report 2017 submitted to Parliament for the reporting period…
Explore
Q10 83/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 75 / 100
The Internal Audit Department of the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) [1], the Office of the Auditor General [2, 3], and Public Procurement and…
Explore
Regularity Score: 100 / 100
The Internal Audit Department of the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) [1], the Office of the Auditor General [2, 3], and Public Procurement and…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 75 / 100
According to military spokesperson [1] and an interview with the chief of legal services, MoDVA [2], risks assessments are used to develop and regularly…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 92/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
During the budget planning process, the ministry presents a detailed break down of what it intends to spend on in that finacial year. There…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The government runs a central procurement online portal for all the ministries, and all the parastatals. In this portal, all the required items and…
Explore
External oversight Score: 75 / 100
According to the defence policy[1], aqusition planning falls under non- operational areas under the section of logistics, procurement and infrastructure. It is stated that…
Explore
Q12 75/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
According to the Budget Framework Paper FY 2020/21 for the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs (MoDVA) [1], there are details on what the…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The legislature receives an accurate defence budget proposal between two to four months before the start of the budget year. Parliament receives the final…
Explore
Q13 50/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Article 90 (1) of the Constitution [1] states that Parliament shall appoint standing committees and other committees necessary for the efficient discharge of its…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
The Defence and Internal Affairs Committee meets various high-ranking members of the military and police on a range of issues related to security and…
Explore
Q14 100/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 100 / 100
The approved defence budget is open to the public and can be accessed easily since it is uploaded onto the internet. It provides the…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
There are are clear and rubust over sight mechanisms over the ministry defence budget, which which is over seen by the Defence and Internal…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 100 / 100
The defence budget can be accessed easily since the copies are deposited in Parliament. Soft copies can also be accessed from the internet by…
Explore
Q15 42/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
According to the Report of the Auditor General on the Financial Statements of the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs for the year ended…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
In each government ministry in Uganda, there are internal audit departments. It is from these different reports which are generated by the internal audit…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Public scrutiny of non-central government sources of funding is minimal or non-existent because of the nature of the sector. Most of the activities are…
Explore
Q16 50/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
The unit is called internal audit department and the process is done every year. It is hard to prove or confirm whether or not…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 25 / 100
The Defence and Internal Affairs Committee receives reports that are heavily redacted. Alleged cases of corruption are widespread in the accounting and budgeting systems…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
The Auditor General is mandated by the constituion to carry out audit functions of any government entity including revewing the internal audit processes. Many…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The MoDVA answers audit findings usually every year, but some findings have not been answered for close to two years. In his report from…
Explore
Q17 81/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The auditor general is mandated to audit military defence expenditure for both classified and non-classified expenditures. In his report to Parliament [1, 2], he…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
Sections 28 and 29 of the National Audit Act 2008 provides that the Office of the Auditor General will be funded by the Government…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
These reports on non-classified procurements are full and published every year between 2004 and 2017. The reports are available online [1, 2, 3] for…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry failed to implement some recommendations from the Procurement and Disposal Audit Report of the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs[1,2] for financial…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 20/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There are no known prohibitions on defence institutions having controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation. Section 209…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
According to many sources, residents in various villages, especially in Hoima and Buliisa districts, alleged that suspected security agents had been threatening landowners to…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 0 / 100
The Daily Monitor reported that the State House Anticorruption Unit and CID were investigating a case where officers of the Police Mineral Protection Unit…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
These interests are not publicly declared and are wholly non-transparent. Most of these activities are done on an individual basis, so the proceeds cannot…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Parliament scrutinises these interests whenever it receives complaints and petitions, making scrutiny irregular and sometimes superficial. So it is not easy to determine whether…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 50/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 50 / 100
There is moderate likelihood of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector. There are no clear or reported cases where…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
The president, his government ad military leaders have admitted that they are aware of the problems of organised crime in defence institutions. They have…
Explore
Q20 0/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 0 / 100
No unit investigates corruption in the military police, soldiers and other members in the defence and security sector. The Police Professional Standards Unit (PSU)…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no policing function exercised over the defence sector to investigate corruption or organised crime. The…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no policing function exercised over the defence sector to investigate corruption or organised crime. The…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 25/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Committee on Defence and Internal Affairs considers policies and budgets of the defence sector, including the intelligence services. However, it may be subjected…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The oversight of the committee has little to no influence over intelligence services, so it is not effective. It rarely rejects proposals, policies, budgets…
Explore
Q22 42/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 50 / 100
There are objective selection criteria, based on the UPDF Act(2005) which spells out how one can be selected for any assignments but it is…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 25 / 100
According to the Uganda Peoples’ Defence Force (UPDF) Act, there are clear provisions for promotions in the army [1]. However, there have been allegations…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
Section 55 [1] of the UPDF Act 2005 provides the considerations for the promotion of an officer or a militant, where the Board shall…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 0/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 0 / 100
Uganda has neither signed up to nor ratified the ATT [1].
Explore
Compliance Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Uganda has neither signed up to nor ratified the ATT [1].
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no evidence that Uganda exports arms [1]
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no law on lobbying. It is important to note that lobbying is widespread amongst the people who always get deals within the…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying in Uganda that is also applicable to the field of defence/security[1,…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying in Uganda that is also applicable to the field of defence/security[1,…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying in Uganda that is also applicable to the field of defence/security[1,…
Explore