Political Risk:

High

Score:

47/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 67/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Albanian Parliament has the power to approve or veto laws on security and to reject or amend defence policy. These powers are conferred…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Following constitutional and legal provisions the Albanian Parliament formally debates security policy and legislation related to defence and security in the permanent committees and…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
One of the typical features of the Albanian Parliament is the political polarization which has resulted from the tendency of alignment between the executive…
Explore
Q2 38/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Since 2004 the Albanian Parliament has established a permanent parliamentary Committee on National Security (CNS). According to the Article 18 of RoPP, the “The…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
The CNS comprises of 18 permanent members and eight substitutes. Nearly half of the members have some experience with the security sector, having held…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 75 / 100
After the adoption of the first National Security and Military Strategy in 2000, the parliament reviewed the Military Strategy in 2002, in 2005, in…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
In its practice, the CNS does not issue amendments to budgets and recommendations. The most common ex-post oversight practice is the organisation of hearing…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
Conducting long term investigations is not an established practice of the CNS. From January 2014 to July 2018 the CNS has held 118 meetings…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
As a result of the lack of a well-established CNS agenda that combines ex-ante and ex-post oversight tools, there has been no meaningful dialogue…
Explore
Q3 56/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
There is very little debate on defence and security policy in Albania. The main security policy documents are the National Security Strategy, the Military…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
The focus of debates varies depending on the document discussed. In the discussions on the national security strategy and military strategy, the debate in…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 50 / 100
The CNS has a list of NGO representatives and experts who are invited to attend meetings where the policy documents or laws related to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The national security policy and military strategy documents are made available publically in its complete form when the drafts reach the parliament. Usually, documents…
Explore
Q4 50/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 50 / 100
The Inter-sectoral Strategy Against Corruption 2015-2020, sets the objective “Encouraging cooperation with the civil society” (Objective C 3 of the Strategy) [1]. One of…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 75 / 100
Albania’s legal and regulatory framework on the right of freedom of association is generally in line with international standards [1]. Albania adopted a law…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
The interaction between the defence and intelligence sector and CSOs on corruption-related issues is very limited. Overall, the interaction between the MoD and the…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Albania is not a major arms exporter. It only sold 1.28 million euros worth of arms in 2016 [1]. Albania has ratified the United…
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
Albania has made efforts to comply with the UNCAC convention [1]. In 2015 Albania adopted the Inter-Sectoral Strategy against Corruption and its Action Plan…
Explore
Q6 25/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 25 / 100
There is no systematic or active public debate on issues of defence in Albania. There are a few CSOs that engage in defence and…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 25 / 100
The typical way the MoD contributes to activities organized by CSOs is by delivering keynote speeches and ensuring that events organised are attended by…
Explore
Q7 50/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 75 / 100
There is no specifically defined and actively implemented strategy on anticorruption in the defence sector in Albania. A clear anticorruption deference strategy is supposed…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 25 / 100
Under the ISSC, the MoD has adopted an Action Plan for the period 2014-2017, which includes 31 measures subdivided in prevention, repressive and awareness-raising,…
Explore
Q8 75/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 100 / 100
Within the defence sector, there are several mechanisms with different mandates that are designed to ensure integrity and tackle wrongdoings. The two largest organisations…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The DISA, the Military Police, and the IAD are established by law and they cannot be removed or shut down by the authorities to…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
It is not possible to estimate the effectiveness of these bodies due to the lack of reports on corruption perceptions by defence and security…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No polls have been conducted specifically to target defence corruption. However, various polls on…
Explore
Q10 25/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 25 / 100
The MoD has not conducted defence specific risk assessments on corruption. However, this is not exclusive to the MoD as no other institution has…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, due to the fact that risk assessments are currently not conducted. According to the Action Plan 2018-2020…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, due to the fact that risk assessments are currently not conducted. According to the Action Plan 2018-2020…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 42/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 50 / 100
Defence acquisition planning is conducted following the long-term plan on the development of the armed forces 2016-2025 [1]. Under the Law on the Powers…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The public has very limited access to the acquisition process. No acquisition plan is published by the MoD. Under the transparency program the MoD…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
The parliament is not involved in ex-post oversight of acquisition planning. Ex-ante oversight is conducted by the parliament through the adoption of the long…
Explore
Q12 75/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The MoD doesn’t publish the defence budget but an aggregated version is published in the law on budget and can be found on the…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The role of the parliament in the approval of the budget is defined in the law on the management of the budgetary system adopted…
Explore
Q13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
According to the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament, the parliament and the permanent committees have all the powers to scrutinise the budget of…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 25 / 100
The defence and security budget is discussed in the CNS in meetings where traditionally the minister of defence and high military officials are invited…
Explore
Q14 33/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The approved budget for all the institutions, including defence and intelligence, is published by the MoF, but in the same aggregated form with the…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The approved defence budget, aggregated in programs, is published by the MoF as soon as it gets adopted by the parliament. The budget is…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
No disaggregated budget is made public. There is no evidence of a published defence budget over the last few years. Open Data Albania, which…
Explore
Q15 33/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The aggregated version of the overall state budget published by the MoF includes two sources financing: domestic and foreign. The same published budget documents…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
There are internal and external mechanisms in place for the scrutiny of incomes generated by the defence sector that include the Internal Audits, the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is limited public scrutiny on the sources of funding of the defence sector. The media has reported on irregularities with the assets, such…
Explore
Q16 38/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 50 / 100
Internal audits in public institutions Albania are regulated by law [1]. The laws provide for the scope of activity and competences of the Internal…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
The overall performance of the Internal Audits is assessed by the SSAI, which has the competence to audit the internal audit systems. The law…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The MoD’s internal audit reports are not published nor presented to the parliament [1, 2]. However, the internal audit reports are available to the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
No disaggregated data exists on the role and institutional outcome of the Internal Audit in security and defence institutions. MoF annual reports do not…
Explore
Q17 69/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
Albania has a consolidated institutional framework for conducting external audits. In its present from the Supreme State Audit Institution was established in 1997 [1].…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The SSAI’s functional, operational and administrative independence is enumerated in the Constitution and the law. The SSAI Chairman is elected and removed from office…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The SSAI reports regularly to the parliament, and the reports are made available to the public on the institution’s website [1]. The reports include…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
Overall, the implementation of SSAI recommendations is low. During 2017 the SSAI made 3521 recommendations and proposed measures to be taken to strengthen financial…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 67/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
A review of the legislation on armed forces and of the legislation that regulates various natural resource sectors shows that there are no specific…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Although there is no explicit legal ban, there are no cases of the defence and security institutions being involved in businesses related to the…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence that proves the engagement of individual defence personnel in businesses related to the country’s natural resource exploitation.
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. There are no cases of the defence and security institutions being involved in businesses related to the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. There are no cases of the defence and security institutions being involved in businesses related to the…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 13/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 25 / 100
Over the last few years, there have been several cases of involvement of armed forces personnel in various organized crime activities [1]. In addition…
Explore
Government response Score: 0 / 100
There is a government awareness of the threat posed by the organised crime which is defined also in the strategic documents. Organized crime is…
Explore
Q20 58/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
The Military Police is the main organization for the investigation of crime and corruption. The Law on Military Police establishes the Military Criminal Police…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
According to legislation, the Military Police and DISA have the powers to investigate cases of corruption and organized crime [1, 2]. However, they don’t…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
There are no official reports on the performance of the Military Police and DISA to be able to assess their effectiveness through figures. However,…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 50/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
In Albania, the two largest agencies that conduct domestic and foreign intelligence gathering activities are the State Intelligence Service (SHISH) (formerly the National Intelligence…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
CNS members have access to classified information, but the committee has no schedule of its own, rather it is determined by the executive agenda…
Explore
Q22 25/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 25 / 100
The Law on the State Intelligence Service (SHISH) doesn’t specify any criteria for the appointment of the agency’s Director [1]. The law on the…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
There is not a competitive process for the appointment of the intelligence directors in Albania. When legislation was adopted in 1992 to place intelligence…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 50 / 100
As a rule, all personnel having access to classified information have to undergo security vetting under the law on classified information [1]. The vetting…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 67/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Albania has ratified the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) in January 2014 (1). The trade of weapons, military materiel and dual use technologies has been…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
According to the Arms Trade Treaty-Baseline Assessment Project (ATT-BAP) Albania has complied with all the ATT articles (1).
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Regarding parliamentary scrutiny, the 2007 law established the legal bases of the export control policy while the Council of Ministers drafts and implements the…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Albania has no legislation on lobbying; however, political parties use part of their finances for lobbying activities aboard, mainly in the United States [1,…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. In the absence of any regulatory framework, no provisions exist on disclosures by public officials in defence…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. In the absence of any regulatory framework, no provisions exist on the registering of lobbyists [1].
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable. In the absence of any regulatory framework, no provisions exist on oversight or the enforcement of lobbying…
Explore