Procurement Risk:

High

Score:

38/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 75/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The PPADB and the PADB Regulations are the principal legislation on procurement, and they…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 100 / 100
Section128 of the PPADB Act provides that: (1) Any person who contravenes the provisions of this Act shall be guilty of an offence. (2)…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Section 63 of the PPADB is titled. Special Procurement Committee and states that: (1) The Board shall establish a Special Procurement and Asset Disposal…
Explore
Q58 25/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 25 / 100
BDF’s procurement processes are formalised with a number of them are published by the PPADB on their website [1]. However, the defence procurement cycle…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
BDF procurement cycle is not disclosed in full. Only the procurement plan and certain provisions are available through the PPADB [1]. For example, in…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
The PPADB Operations Manual provides detailed steps that must be followed by the BDF [1]. However, it is difficult to ascertain their implementation due…
Explore
Q59 33/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
Procurement oversight mechanisms are largely independent, formalised processes. They may be subject to occasional undue influence from parliament, the military, business or politically well-connected…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
There are no robust procurement oversight mechanisms evidenced by the lack of sound reports by the DCEC and PPADB on their oversight work within…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
As explained in 59B, the lack of reports to support the actual oversight activities demonstrates the lack of transparency and effectiveness of these oversight…
Explore
Q60 50/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Potential defence purchases that are not sensitive are made public [1]. However, the projections of the potential procurements are usually for 12-24 months and…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 75 / 100
As explained in 60A, notices of purchases are published on the PPADB website [1,2]. However, the government occasionally publishes the plans for defence purchases…
Explore
Q61 75/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The Military’s purchases are publicised by the PPADB, which are accessible via the link below: [1,2,3]. The information available on the PPADB website, highlighting…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 100 / 100
Data regarding the purchases is released mostly using the PDF and EXCEL. This too is available on the PPADB website [1,2].
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
The following PPADB Act provisions are applicable, however there are no specific references to anti-corruption clauses or requirements. 116. Register of contractors. The Board…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ because there are no policies which require anti-corruption standards in defence procurement contracts.[1,2]
Explore
Q63 17/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
There is no official Defence Strategy in Botswana. As such, procurement requirements are not derived from the Defence Strategy [1]. For example, BDF through…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
There is no defence strategy in Botswana, so purchases are not justified with regards to their alignment to a strategy. In terms of general…
Explore
Purchases Score: 25 / 100
Procurement requirements are generally conducted in terms of identifiable quantities that are published in terms of the PPAD Act [1]. In most cases, these…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 50/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 75 / 100
In the absence of any quantitative research and based on the tenders published by the PPADB, an estimated 70% of the defence purchases are…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
The PPADB Act amplified by the PPADB Manual makes provision for the procedures to be followed when procuring entity wishes to employ single-sourcing [1].…
Explore
Q65 58/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
The Bostwana Procurement Code of Ethics provides inter alia that, as stipulated by Sections 3 and 8 of the PPAD Act defining the scope…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
Tender Boards are subject to regulations and codes of conduct. Their decisions are subject to an independent audit to ensure due process and fairness.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Section 19 of the PPADB Act provides the following in the spirit of transparency: (1) Procuring entities of the Defence Force, Police Service, and…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator.There is internal scrutiny followed by external institutions such as DCEC, the Auditor General and the…
Explore
Q66 75/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
Collusion by bidders taking part in any BDF procurement is punished in tems of the PPADB Act and the CECA Act [1]. Collusion falls…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Sanctions are in two phases, first, under the PPADB Act and second, under the CECA Act [1]. The former provides for administrative measures in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
Enforcement has been problematic, with corruption taking deep roots in Botswana especially within government ministries. Graft busters at the Directorate on Corruption and Economic…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
Procurement officials usually have an appreciation of corruption before they start work on procurement [1]. The assumption is that they would have the necessary…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 44/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
The PPADB Act in conjunction with the PPADB Manual outlines the procedures that must be followed by contractors in terms of their contractual obligations…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The winning bid for non-classisifed contracts such as purchases of uniforms, vehicles, furniture are publicly available on the PPADB website [1]. However, post award…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 25 / 100
There is no systematic periodical generation of reports that indicate monitoring [1]. In practice, the officer releases monitoring records if a particular contract either…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The PPADB Act as well as the CECA provide extensively for sanctions of breaches of procurement contracts [1]. Depending on the nature of the…
Explore
Q68 75/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Section 77 of the PPADB Act provides as follows: claim for compensation for contravention of legal provisions (1) a person who is aggrieved by…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
As explained in 68A, the PPADB and the PPADB Manual have a complaint mechanism [1]. However, there are no published cases by PPADB, which…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, as there are no reported cases of aggrieved companies that fear future discrimnation should they…
Explore
Q69 75/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Section 16 of the PPADB provides that the register of persons found with a fault (1) The Independent Committee shall establish a register of…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
Generally, cases are investigated independently. However, there have been a few reports of corruption, in the BDF, that have never been investigated and this…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NEI / 100
PPADB have not recently reported any cases of this nature. The Code of Conduct expressly prohibits collusion, frontism, tokenism, window dressing and rent-seeking behaviour,…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence with regards to offset accounts in the security services sector [1,2]. There is no legislation which either permits or prohibits…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence with regards to offset accounts in the security services sector [1]. Even the PPADB Act and the PPADB Manual are…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of a policy or procedure on offset contracts. The law is also silent on this matter [1,2]. There is evidence…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any public information on offset contracts. There are no provisions in the law covering this matter [1,2].
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any public information on offset contracts. There are no provisions in the law covering this matter [1,2].
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any public information on offset contracts. There are no provisions in the law covering this matter [1,2].
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There are no examples of offset contracts that the Botswana Defence Forces have been involved in [1,2].
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 38/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The PPADB Act and the PPADB Manual do not expressly prohibit the use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle [1]. The assumption…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Sanctions that are provided for by the PPADB Act and CECA are applied [1]. However, some alleged cases of corruption that have been reported…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
General information regarding the financing package is available [1]. However, the intrinsic details that regulate the actual operationalisation of the contract are not publicly…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence of any influence on the BDF by the selling nations…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Where the government purchases equipment from a supplier outside the jurisdiction of Botswana, the…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There have been allegations that certain purchases by the BDF took place as a…
Explore