Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

24/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 13/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Chilean legal framework for the system of acquisitions and contracting in the defence…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 25 / 100
The law for acquisitions or “Ley de Compras” establishes a general framework with a flexible normative body and basic rules and procedures for acquisitions…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The multiplicity and dispersion of the legislation relative to acquisitions and contract in the defence sector have somewhat hindered their effective implementation. In August…
Explore
Q58 NEI/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The disclosure of the defence procurement cycle is fragmented and dispersed. In conjunction with the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The disclosure of the defence procurement cycle is fragmented and dispersed. In conjunction with the institutions of defence, the system of public procurement or…
Explore
Implementation Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. This is due to limited information on the policies and procedures relating to the defence…
Explore
Q59 42/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 75 / 100
There are internal and external procurement oversight mechanisms. Internally, the Ministry of National Defence (MDN) is responsible for oversight of the investment of resources…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
The institutions of defence have been working on the development of an overall framework to rationalise investment and procurement based on the concept of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The transparency and publicity of oversight for procurement are highly unequal. There is no transparency relating to the internal oversight mechanisms in the armed…
Explore
Q60 13/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
In conformity with the 2006 Law of Fiscal Responsibility [1], the last edition of the Book of Defence [2] defined a system of investment…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
The MDN does not publish plans for defence purchases in advance or with sufficient detail. Particular institutions in the defence sector may publish their…
Explore
Q61 88/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The acquisitions of goods and services made through public bidding in the web system Chile Compras can be traced and disaggregated by the respective…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 100 / 100
Data released through the Chile Compras is available in an accessible way through a centralised search engine [1, 2]. The information published pertains to…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
While there are procedures in place for the exclusion of bidders from registries and/or tenders, anti-corruption concerns do not seem to be of any…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’. There are no standards relating to anti-corruption compliance required in defence procurement. Furthermore, there is evidence of obstacles…
Explore
Q63 17/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
According to Article 5 Section g) of Law 20424 (Organic Bylaws of the National Defence Ministry), the Minister of Defence “proposes acquisition and investment…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Formally, oversight of procurement in the defence sector has been conducted by the Special Commission of Defense in Congress, by the General Comptroller, and…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
As mentioned in 63A, there are no set of rules in force for tying purchases to a national defence strategy; this means that “purchases…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
There is no public information on the percentage of acquisitions that belong to open competition (public bidding), private competition (private bidding) and direct contract.…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
There are two mechanisms for procurement in defence other than public bidding: private bidding, when particular tenders are called to formulate proposals according to…
Explore
Q65 0/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
The regulation and oversight of tender boards for procurement and acquisitions in the defence sector are decentralised and fragmented within different agencies and branches…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of comprehensive audits to tender boards and officials involved in selecting suppliers and designing tender specification. There is some evidence…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is very little transparency in the operation and regulation of the bidding boards and their associated members. Tender boards regulations and codes of…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
As outlined in 63A and 63C, the 2017 White Paper referenced in this answer is an aspirational policy document, not a law [1]. There…
Explore
Q66 58/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
The country has a general legal framework that penalises collusion between firms that may affect free competition, including the results of bids made by…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
There is legislation that excludes companies and individuals who have been convicted of bribery and corruption for hiring and bidding with state agencies and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Academic literature, international reports, and investigative journalism provide a mixed picture on the degree of enforcement of legislation to discourage and punish collusion in…
Explore
Training Score: NEI / 100
An online search – and through interviews – revealed no information on whether training is provided for procurement officials with regards to collusion in…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 25/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
There are formal rules to ensure that bidders and contractors that contract with public entities comply with their obligations on reporting and delivery. However,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Contracts are available for those acquisitions and procurement that goes through the System of Public Procurement ChileCompra [1, 2, 3, 4]. For each contract,…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There has been a critical evaluation of the monitoring systems and the extent to which officials in the defence sector regularly oversee contract completion.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
More specific information is needed on the frequency of enforcement and whether external scrutiny is available if necessary to provide a score for this…
Explore
Q68 75/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Formal procedures and mechanisms to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement in the defence sector are formally established; however, their functioning and guarantees are…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
Complaint mechanisms are available for procurement and contracting procedures that operate through the public procurement system ChileCompra. In this system, companies and individuals can…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 75 / 100
There is no evidence of companies that have been discriminated against or barred from procurements because of genuine complaints. Complaint mechanisms for procurement and…
Explore
Q69 NEI/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Legislation to exclude companies and senior company officials in the face of bribery and corruption-related offences exists, but procurement officials might have limited authority…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NEI / 100
An online search – and through interviews – revealed insufficient information on the subject of prosecution and undue influence. As such, this indicator is…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NEI / 100
An online search – and through interviews – revealed insufficient information on the subject of prosecution and undue influence. As such, this indicator is…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of offset contract regulation, and it is permitted and utilised [1, 2]. The mechanism of industrial compensation (offset) projects has…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of anti-corruption due diligence imposed on offset contracts.
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are no policies for offset contracts in general, and the specific committee that oversaw them disbanded. The government of Chile is aware of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There has been a tradition of opacity in offset contracts and acquisitions in the defence sector. Early on, the authors identified the lack of…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of completion reports with supplier performance appraisals for offset contracts. The lack of monitoring of contracts has been pointed out…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
Article 13 of Law 19.866 grants the government the power to terminate a contract in cases of non-compliance [1]. However, there is not enough…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is very little evidence on the degree of competition to which compensation contracts have been subjected. Indirect background information of the use of…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 25/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
There have been serious concerns for the discretionary and opaque use of intermediaries in cases of alleged corruption in acquisition in the armed forces…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
Given that the government imposes no restrictions on the use of agents and intermediaries, this indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’.
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Detailed information on the financing packages surrounding the main arms agreements in the armed forces is rarely available either before or after the signing…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is some evidence in the post-authoritarian period of corruption due to military acquisition…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There has been some justification of military procurement based on military needs, but this…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The existence of domestic pressures for granting acquisitions has been a concern in the…
Explore