Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

24/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 38/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The legal framework for military procurement consists of the following set of regulations and…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
The CMC Equipment Procurement Regulations make reference to conducting procurement with honesty (article 6) and to a commitment to punishing abuse of power, collusion,…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
There is no transparency in this regard. However, the fact that there was extensive corruption in the former General Logistics Department, [1,2,3] which was…
Explore
Q58 50/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The Equipment Procurement Regulations (中央军委装备采购条) of 2002 outline the process of procurement in detail, with deadlines and concrete measures that need to be taken…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
On the two procurement platforms, relevant regulations can be found, as well as many announcements on technical aspects (for instance on the registration of…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
On the two procurement platforms, relevant regulations can be found, as well as many announcements on technical aspects (for instance on the registration of…
Explore
Q59 13/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
Οversight mechanisms are internal, under the CMC hierarchy, not independent. After the CMC reorganisation in 2016, these include the CMC Equipment Development Department (responsible…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NEI / 100
No publicly available reports on the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms in procurement appear to be available on the MoD and CMC websites, or via…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Οversight mechanisms in the procurement process are not transparent at all. Their operation methods and effectiveness are unknown.
Explore
Q60 13/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Forward planning exists but is not transparent. The CMC Equipment Procurement Regulations (2002, 装备采购条例) [1] stipulate a three-year procurement cycle with detailed timeframes and…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
In the few instances when the MoD has announced its plans for purchases in White Papers or official statements, there has been no clear…
Explore
Q61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
Defence purchases are made public in two ways. Regarding major weapon systems, the public is informed through official press releases and military parades. For…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Αpart from official press releases and announcements on the type of weapons systems purchased, its origin and its operational stage, there is no other…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 25/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
Military procurement in China until the late 2000s was a closed system regulated by the CMC and the State Administration of Science, Technology and…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 50 / 100
The existence of a licensing system which also restricts access to the two online platforms for military procurement shows that these regulations are implemented…
Explore
Q63 25/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 25 / 100
Ιn broad terms, China’s weapons procurement is aligned with the strategic priorities and goals presented in its Defence White Papers. For instance, purchases of…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Τhere is no evidence of external scrutiny of actual purchases to ensure that they fall under the national defence strategy by any non-military oversight…
Explore
Purchases Score: 50 / 100
With the existing degree of transparency in budgets [1] and procurement processes we cannot make a safe assessment on the existence of opportunistic purchases.…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 25/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 50 / 100
A distinction must be made between weaponry and non-weaponry procurement. Procurement of major weaponry (usually Russian weapons systems) is conducted through single-sourcing, [1] while…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
Oversight mechanisms are internal, not external and have recently undergone a major restructuring. [1] There is no publicly available information on how scrutiny over…
Explore
Q65 6/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
Article 33 of the Regulations on the Competitive Procurement of Equipment stipulates the following illegal activities of individuals involved in tender board processes: failure…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
There is no transparency in the audit trails in tender boards. The only information available is public announcements by companies and research institutions announcing…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Τhere are no regulations regarding the transparency of tender boards. The actual procurement decision-making process is very secretive by design. [1,2]
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no external verification of tender requirements and specifications. The procurement process is managed by the CMC Equipment Development Department without external (non-military)…
Explore
Q66 67/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
According to Αrticle 57 of the 2010 Weapons and Equipment Quality Management Regulations (武器装备质量管理条例), collusion is prohibited both between officials and production units (bidders)…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Τhe legislation mentioned above stipulates two types of punishment depending on the severity of the crime: a) punishments according to the PRC Regulations on…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is very limited public information on cases of collusion between bidders, as well as bidders and officials. Pei Minxin reports that collusive corruption…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
Τhere is no publicly available information on the type of training followed by procurement officials.
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 31/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
Articles 16-51 of the 2010 Weapons and Equipment Quality Management Regulations outline a process with various stages and controls, deadlines, reporting requirements, clear inspection…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Apart from the legal framework, there is no publicly available information on reporting and delivery. The military procurement platforms post a project completion notice…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 25 / 100
The CCP has opened more military contracts to private contractors since 2016 [1] and relevant regulations have been enacted [2] but there is no…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Although relevant regulations are in place, there is no transparency in terms of contract implementation. As such, nothing is known about how breaches of…
Explore
Q68 NEI/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
There are detailed relevant regulations [1] and, at least on paper, an institutionalised and straightforward complaints mechanism that is easily accessible online. [2,3] The…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: NEI / 100
There is no publicly available information on the use of complaint mechanisms in defence procurement, although the mechanisms are in place. As such, this…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
There are no known cases of retaliation following complaints in defence procurement processes that have emerged in the Chinese or English press. It is…
Explore
Q69 58/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There are two types of sanctions: administrative and criminal. Administrative sanctions include suspending or revoking licences for equipment procurement and production (Articles 52-6, Weapons…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
Undue influence is a systemic problem in military procurement in China and, in the past, there have been many cases of corruption in procurement.…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 25 / 100
China’s Defence Industrial Complex, comprised of State Owned Enterprises, is very secretive and corrupt. [1] No case of an SOE being banned from military…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There are no laws or policies regulating offset contracts for general and defence procurement. [1]
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
There are no specific regulations or laws on offset contracts.
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There are no specific policies or procedures (state or military) on monitoring offset contracts in China, [1] despite them having been used in government…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The government does not publicise details of offset contracts.
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
These reports, if produced, are not made public.
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There are no instances of breaches of offset contracts that have been reported in the media.
Explore
Q72 25/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
China does not have an official policy on offset contracts [1] but has used them extensively to secure technology transfers and other benefits. [2]…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NEI/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Αccording to an ADB//OCD report, China has a comprehensive legal framework for the control of intermediaries in government procurement. [1] However, this legal framework…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
Τhere is no information regarding the control of intermediaries in military procurement. We have very limited information regarding their use, such as the case…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no public information on financing packages surrounding major arms deals. The CMC Procurement Regulations (2002) do not stipulate public access to information…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. China’s arms imports are mainly from Russia (67%), followed by Ukraine and France, which…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The CCP and the PLA justify the procurement and development of major weapons systems…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence that China’s defence acquisition decisions are influenced by domestic political…
Explore