Operational Risk:

Very High

Score:

19/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to China Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 25/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 25 / 100
Τhe latest version of China’s Defence White Paper clearly identifies corruption as a key issue in operations. [1] However, apart from occasioanal news reports…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’. Αs per Q51A, although China officially recognises corruption as an important issue of its National Defence policy, there…
Explore
Q52 NEI/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Apart from anticorruption training in the MoD and PLA , as assessed in Q48, there…
Explore
Q53 NEI/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. There is no public information on any aspect of forward planning in PLA deployments abroad.…
Explore
Application Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, as no information on this matter coud be accessed. Further, no cases of corruption involving…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 NEI/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No information could be found to establish the existence of anticorruption monitoring professionals in the…
Explore
M&E policy Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence to suggest that M&E guidance exists beyond that which is outlined in 54A,…
Explore
Transparency Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. This is due to the lack of evidence to establish if such monitoring takes place.
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 13/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Τhere are no publicly available guidelines on contracting during operations, but this does not mean that they do no exist internally. In fact the…
Explore
Training Score: 25 / 100
There is no evidence of relevant corruption in contracting training taking place, apart from what the UN Department of Peackeeping Operations already provides. [1]…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. China has ratified the Montreux Document on Private Military and Security Companies. [1] In…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. China’s Armed Forces do not employ Private Contractors. The 2010 “Regulations on the Administration…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. China’s Armed Forces do not employ PMCs so there are no instances of misconduct…
Explore