Political Risk:

Moderate

Score:

54/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 33/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
In Colombia, the Colombian Congress has eight functions as stipulated in Law 5 of 1992, [1] which are defined in Article 6 as: the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Congress has legislative powers regarding the defence sector and has exercised actions in this regard. Between 2016 and 2018, the Congress of the Republic…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There are continued pressures by armed organisations, some paramilitary, on Members of Congress, including physical threats. [1] Between 2018 and 2019, some opposition Congress…
Explore
Q2 30/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Law 3 of 1992 sets up a Standing Constitutional Commisson in charge of “national defence and public force.” Artcle 137 of the Colombian Constitution…
Explore
Expertise Score: 0 / 100
The Constitutional Court in its Judgment C-540 of 2001 considers that the standing committees of the Congress of the Republic are composed of pre-established…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 25 / 100
Congress has a responsibility to review the relevant defence policies and decisions every 4 years in accordance with the legislative term length. The Congress…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
Committee meeting sessions take place in their own right and they do not depend on calls for convening or subpoenas by the government or…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
With regard to long-term supervision, once a year the Ministry of Defence and the Armed Forces and the Police submit a policy implementation report…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NEI / 100
Given the construction of public policies on defence and national security are carried out from the perspective of the government, it is clear that…
Explore
Q3 44/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 25 / 100
The defence and security policy in Colombia is defined at the ministerial and sectoral level, based on the dialogue within the Executive. In February…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
The discussion about defence and security policy focuses largely on identifying threats, but it lacks depth in addressing strategies to deal with them. The…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 50 / 100
Citizen consultation processes are promoted through a variety of different areas of participation, such as through formal mechanisms like the Citizen Oversight Committees established…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The adoption of the Transparency Act in 2014 achieved a major shift towards greater publicity and access to information corresponding to the accounts, decisions,…
Explore
Q4 50/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 50 / 100
Historically, decisions regarding defence and security issues in Colombia have been handled with secrecy by the Colombian state, given the context of the armed…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
In Colombia, civil society organisations are very active and cover a wide variety of social, political, economic, and environmental issues. However, levels of violence…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
In Colombia there is a legal and regulatory framework around the promotion of transparency and access to information in order to counter corruption, as…
Explore
Q5 88/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
On 29 March 1996, Colombia signed the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, whose aim was to prevent, detect, sanction, and eradicate corruption, as well as…
Explore
Compliance Score: 75 / 100
Colombia is compliant with most of its obligations in priority areas defined by the ratified Conventions. On the website of the Secretariat for Transparency,…
Explore
Q6 75/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
There is regular public debate on advocacy issues amongst academics, journalists, opinion-makers and social organisations. After the signing of the Peace Agreement, discussions around…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
During the presidential term of Iván Duque, spaces for public debate have been promoted through the “Building country” workshops, whose objective is to establish…
Explore
Q7 63/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
Colombia has a consolidated regulatory framework around the fight against corruption: a) Law 1474 of 12 July 2011, “Anti-Corruption Statute”, which dictates rules aimed…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 25 / 100
Law 1474 of 2011, [1] on the fight against corruption, stipulates that all public entities must build a strategy to combat corruption and address…
Explore
Q8 75/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The Colombian legislation clearly stipulates that internal control offices have the independence to carry out…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
With respect to the independence of officials of internal oversight offices, Article 8 of the Anti-Corruption Statute [1] mentions that appointments are made by…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence, the Armed Forces and the Police understand the specific risks of corruption in their institutions, which is why they have…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. According to opinion polls conducted during the periods 2017-2019, there is a high level…
Explore
Q10 75/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 75 / 100
In accordance with Article 73 of Law 1474 of 2011, [1] the Anti-Corruption Statute, each government entity must annually develop an “Anti-Corruption and Citizen…
Explore
Regularity Score: 100 / 100
Article 73 of Law 1474 of 2011 states that the “Anti-Corruption and Citizen Care Plan” referenced in 10A needs to be elaborated in a…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
Following the guidelines of the Administrative Department of the Civil Service, it is possible to adjust and/or modify the Anti-Corruption and Citizen Service Plans…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 67/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 50 / 100
All public entities must develop and publish an Annual Procurement Plan, which is the contractual planning instrument of each institution and allows for the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Article 6 of Decree 1510 of 2013 [1] obliges all state entities to publish their Annual Procurement Plan, in addition to updates made during…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
The oversight functions of procurement plans are stipulated in the Colombian legal framework in Law 80 of 1993, Decree 1082 of 2015 and Law…
Explore
Q12 100/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The general budget of the nation is developed through six stages that make up the budget cycle, defined and regulated by Decree 4730 of…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The budget for the defence sector is developed by the planning offices of the entities who have the responsibility to plan, advise, develop, consolidate,…
Explore
Q13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Strictly speaking, the Second Commission of Congress has the power to supervise defence matters. However, Article 2 of Law 3 of 1992 states that…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 25 / 100
The Second Committee does not have the competence, influence, nor responsibility for carrying out possible amendments to the Law of the National Budget or…
Explore
Q14 50/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The General Budget of the Nation is disclosed to the public through the website of the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit. For the…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
It is evident that, although there is a transparency law in Colombia that seeks to regulate the right of access to public information, there…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 50 / 100
The Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information stipulates the right of every person to request and receive information from public entities. The…
Explore
Q15 67/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The publication of sources of defence income that do not come from government allocations is not clearly identifiable in the defence sector budget for…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Institutional scrutiny of defence revenue that does not come from the central government is carried out by the internal oversight offices and the Planning…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
We cannot distinguish scrutiny specifically for this indicator, but, generally, it is evident that there is considerable and consistent scrutiny within the media about…
Explore
Q16 81/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The Office of Internal Control in the Ministry of Defence is in charge of carrying out internal audits and permanent controls on spending. There…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 75 / 100
The supervision and application of the internal audit process by the internal control office develops actions for all corruption-related issues within the Ministry of…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
As per the Law of Transparency, all reports made by the internal control office are public and easily accessible. Therefore, civil society organisations or…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The findings of the control offices are disseminated in management reports, reports on the evaluation of the internal control system, reports of self-assessment by…
Explore
Q17 75/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
In Colombia, the Comptroller General of the Republic (CGR) conducts external audits and has a constitutional mandate to exercise surveillance of fiscal management in…
Explore
Independence Score: 75 / 100
Article 267 of the Colombian Constitution states that the Office of the Comptroller General has functional and budgetary autonomy. [1] Law 42 of 1993…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The CGR, in accordance with the Transparency Law, [1] publishes only the results of its audits, but not the progress of its processes on…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
Once the audit has been conducted by the CGR and the report has been delivered, the entities are obliged to submit an improvement plan…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 45/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The Colombian State has the role of controlling and planning the management and/or use of natural resources. The State is the owner of the…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
The defence sector consists of 18 decentralized entities that make up the Social and Business Group of the Defence (GSED). [1] None of them…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
In the context of the armed conflict and the post-conflict process, possible links and relations between the military forces and police groups are seen…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Details of the budget implementation for the defence sector are published quarterly on the website of the Ministry of Defence. [1] This publication includes…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The defence sector has the ‘Line of Honor’ strategy in order to receive complaints and allegations from all entities in the sector. [1] The…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 0/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 0 / 100
After the signing of the Peace Agreement between the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the Colombian Government, various social organisations including CINEP…
Explore
Government response Score: 0 / 100
The Colombian government is aware of the relationship or ties that organised crime and paramilitary groups have had with Armed Forces. These relations have…
Explore
Q20 58/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
The Military Forces have a group of norms and institutions whose objective is the investigation of crimes committed in service. Decree 1797 of 2000,…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Inspection Offices of the different Armed Forces are independent, neutral, and impartial to the disciplinary investigations and audits they conduct. This is explicitly…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
In Colombia there is debate about the competence of Military Criminal Justice and ordinary justice, since it is not yet clear the scope of…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 NEI/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: NEI / 100
The entity responsible for carrying out strategic intelligence and counter-intelligence for the State is the National Directorate of Intelligence (DNI). [1] The DNI is…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The documentation available by request through the control and surveillance assistance procedures is often reserved in nature, so the National Directorate of Intelligence (DNI)…
Explore
Q22 17/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 50 / 100
On the National Directorate of Intelligence (DNI) website, it states that all positions of the entity are of free appointment and removal. According to…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
There is no available evidence to conclude that there are objective and accessible criteria for access to Senior defense positions. Selection is questionable, since…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
Given the evidence found, it is not possible to determine that there is a comprehensive background investigation process on the suitability of the individual…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 25/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 50 / 100
In 2013, Colombia signed the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), [1] but has not ratified it to date. As such, there is no regulatory body…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
In Colombia, only the State can export and import weapons. In the export process, the government has a consolidated military industry that allows it…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no overarching legal framework governing lobbying in Colombia, although it is a practice that is carried out permanently in Congress of the…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as there is no legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as there is no legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been marked Not Applicable, as there is no legislation that regulates lobbying in the defence sector.
Explore