Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

0/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Cote d’Ivoire Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
There is no official military doctrine within the armed forces which specifically addresses corruption as a strategic issue during military operations. This does not…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Côte d’Ivoire has no military doctrine stating that corruption is a strategic issue for operations. Therefore this indicator has been scored Not Applicable.
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Côte d’Ivoire lacks a known training in corruption issues for commanders of the armed forces. This type of training is not provided in the…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
There is a total absence of corruption as a strategic issue during the forward planning stages of military deployments (pré-déploiement opérationnel). For example, the…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence for the integration of corruption as a strategic issue in the forward planning of military deployments in theory or in…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that Côte d’Ivoire’s military deploys trained professionals to monitor corruption in the field. There is also no evidence of informal…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that there is any type of M&E guidance in the field (1).
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
As shown by 54A and 54B, there is no evidence of any corruption monitoring or of monitoring and evaluation while the armed forces are…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of specific guidelines for corruption risk in the contracting procedures for deployed operations or peacekeeping missions. The Public Procurement Code…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence in open sources indicating that staff are trained on corruption risk during contracting that takes place when troops are deployed…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Côte d’Ivoire imposes some controls on the use of private military contractors (PMCs). But…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is a lack of a real legal framework or policy for the use…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Evidence shows that there are only a few controls on the use of PMCs…
Explore