Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

21/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. On the website of the National Procurement Regulatory Authority (Autorité Nationale de Régulation des…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
Côte d’Ivoire has no defence-specific legislation covering this type of public procurement, as shown in 57A.
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
Côte d’Ivoire has no legislation regulating defence and security procurement. Therefore this indicator is marked Not Applicable. Since there is no defence-specific legislation and…
Explore
Q58 13/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
The defence procurement cycle from beginning to end is not subject to any legal requirement for public disclosure. Unlike other ministries in Côte d’Ivoire,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
From 2015-2018 certain aspects of the defence procurement cycle (chaîne d’approvisionnement) are disclosed, though only in a very abbreviated and general way. However, this…
Explore
Implementation Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence.
Explore
Q59 8/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
Some oversight mechanisms are specific to defence and security operations and administration. Though no evidence of their independence given their lack of transparency. The…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The General Inspectorate of the Armed Forces and the Comptroller General (CGAFD) oversee defence procurement contracts. But the effectiveness of these institutions is difficult…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The oversight roles of the General Inspectorate and General Control of the Armed Forces in monitoring defence procurement projects are fully opaque.
Explore
Q60 38/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The adoption of the five-year Military Planning Act (Loi de Programmation Militaire, LPM) 2016-2020 serves as a general roadmap for potential purchases through 2020.…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
Highly aggregate figures have been published by Ivorian media about the planned defence investments in equipment and infrastructure, based on the LPM 2016-2020. The…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Few actual defence purchases are disclosed by Ivorian media. Some information is available via Côte d’Ivoire’s military partners (mainly France) or by international suppliers…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that the MoD release data on actual purchases in any type of format because there is no legal provision mandating…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 50/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
There are legal provisions in the 2009 Code of Public Procurement on procedures and standards that companies are required to follow when negotiating a…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 50 / 100
There is some evidence that the provisions in Articles 48-49 and 185-187 in the 2009 Code of Public Procurement are sometimes implemented when negotiating…
Explore
Q63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
The Military Planning Act for 2016-2020 (Loi de Programmation Militaire, LPM 2016-2020) was adopted on January 4, 2016. However, the LPM is perceived as…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
No evidence of published audits by oversight mechanisms (NA, Commission de Securité et Défense, Inspection Générale des Armées, Cour des Comptes) that would confirm…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
The evidence points to an opportunistic policy that does not strictly follow the policy guidelines of the LPM 2016-2020. As a result, the purchases…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
Most contracts are not negotiated via open competitions and even less in the form of a restricted competition. Most of the evidence for large-scale…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
The preferred method for large-scale defence procurement (armoured vehicles, patrol boats, weaponry) is single-sourcing. This suggests that there is no oversight from watchdog institutions,…
Explore
Q65 31/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement provides for the National Authority for Regulation of Public Contracts and the Special Commission tasked with opening and…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
The audit trails (external verification) that would provide information on how suppliers were selected or how the public tender was designed are not available…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The activities of the Special Commission tasked with evaluating bids, as per Articles 43-45 of the 2009 Code of Public Procurement, are required to…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Evidence dating to March 22, 2018, that the ANRMP published an Expression of Interest notice to verify that public tenders in 2017 complied with…
Explore
Q66 19/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
There are provisions against collusion in the 2009 Code of Public Procurement and the fact that they only apply to the bidders (soumissionnaires). These…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
The provisions in Articles 185-187 in the 2009 Code of Public Procurement exclude companies found guilty of corruption (fraudulent practices) from applying for future…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There are prosecuted cases and rescinded contracts through formal processes. However, none of the cases are linked to the Ministry of Defense. It is…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There are provisions against collusion in the 2009 Code of Public Procurement and the fact that they only apply to the bidders (soumissionnaires). These…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 25 / 100
There are some provisions in the 2009 Code of Public Procurement regarding the monitoring and evaluating of public contracts provide oversight of the performance…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Neither the 2009 Code of Public Procurement nor Decree No. 2009-260 on the organization and operations of the ANRMP contain provisions for transparency in…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
At least some procurement units are drawing up contract monitoring and completion reports. However, there is no evidence of such monitoring for public tenders…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
The ANRMP acts on at least some of the perceived breaches of contract by suppliers and services providers, as shown by the red-listed companies…
Explore
Q68 75/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Both Decree No. 2009-260 on the functioning of the ANRMP and Decree No. 2009-259 (Code of Public Procurement) provide for complaint mechanisms for bidding…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. There are recent (2015-2016) cases in which the ANRMP’s Recourse…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
The activities of the ANRMP’s Recourse and Sanctions Unit (CRS), which has emboldened companies in Côte d’Ivoire to use it as a vehicle of…
Explore
Q69 100/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
ANRMP officials are empowered by the 2009 Code of Public Procurement to impose sanctions and punish the corrupt activities of a supplier. Though Articles…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 100 / 100
TThere are cases for which rulings are available on the ANRMP website where companies were convicted of irregularities in a public procurement process. The…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There are recent cases on the ANRMP’s website with the names and individual rulings against companies/suppliers found guilty of irregularities during the procurement process.…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The score of NA is based on the fact that the use of offset contracts is not a standard legal practice in Côte d’Ivoire.…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement does not contain any provisions regarding offset contracts or evoking the use of this type of legal arrangement.…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement does not contain any provisions regarding offset contracts or evoking the use of this type of legal arrangement.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement does not contain any provisions regarding offset contracts or evoking the use of this type of legal arrangement.…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement does not contain any provisions regarding offset contracts or evoking the use of this type of legal arrangement.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement does not contain any provisions regarding offset contracts or evoking the use of this type of legal arrangement.…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The 2009 Code of Public Procurement does not contain any provisions regarding offset contracts or evoking the use of this type of legal arrangement.…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 38/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The behaviour of “private agents” (agents privés) can be sanctioned by the ANRMP during the procurement cycle, as per Articles 11, 183 and 184…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Though there are some government controls over private agents (agents privés) in the procurement cycle, there was no mention in the ANRMP’s 2017 Annual…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Most information detailing the financing of major arms deals is not publicly disclosed in Côte d’Ivoire. Such information is considered a state secret (secret…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Political and military partnerships with several countries mean it is not uncommon for the…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government has at times justified its purchases of military equipment by referring to…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Recent evidence suggests that defence acquisitions are driven more by seller nations such as…
Explore