Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

18/100

Collapse
57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not scored in the GDI. In Côte d’Ivoire, public procurement is governed by Ordinance No. 2019-679 of 24 July 2019 on…
Explore
Risks of corruption Score: 0 / 100
The defence and security sector is excluded from the Public Procurement Code and there is no other legislation governing it [1].
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
The defence and security sector is excluded from the Public Procurement Code and there is no other legislation that could govern it, so this…
Explore
58 17/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
As the defence sector is excluded from the public procurement code, the public procurement cycle in this area remains opaque, particularly with regard to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Although traces of acquisitions may appear in the budget or in the press, the rest of the procedures are not public. Some acquisitions are…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
Internal procedures and policies exist, but they can be largely circumvented. The gendarmerie headquarters and the high command submit their requests to the National…
Explore
59 8/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
In theory, the General Inspectorate of the Armed Forces (IGA) could carry out inspections relating to public procurement [1]. The IGA’s primary mission is…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
In reality, there is no indication that any of these institutions exercise control over public procurement in the defence sector. No activity reports are…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
No information is available. The mechanisms are opaque because the issue remains sensitive [1, 2].
Explore
60 25/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Defence procurement planning exists through programming laws, although the one for the period 2020-2025 has not yet been adopted. The most recent one covers…
Explore
Notices of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
Programming laws, defence and security budgets and some National Security Council communiqués provide some insight into certain acquisitions, but much of this information is…
Explore
61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Completeness Score: 25 / 100
Very little communication occurs on equipment purchases. In some cases, their inauguration is shown (particularly patrol boats), but no information is provided on costs.…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data on acquisitions is not easily accessible [1, 2].
Explore
62 25/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Official policies Score: 50 / 100
There is general legislation on public procurement [1]. Article 37 of the Public Procurement Code stipulates that the selection of candidates must include ethical…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 0 / 100
The concept of defence secrecy, the exclusion of contracts relating to national defence and security needs from the scope of the Public Procurement Code,…
Explore
63 42/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement needs Score: 50 / 100
Planning of requirements based on national strategic priorities is progressing. Programming laws, national development plans and even budgets reflected the efforts made in this…
Explore
Control Score: 25 / 100
In theory, oversight tools exist, notably through the two chambers of Parliament and the army inspectorate, but they are rarely used [1, 2, 3].
Explore
Procurement Score: 50 / 100
Procurement is a mixture of planning and opportunism [1, 2]. Some purchases appear to be justified by pre-established strategic needs [3]. However, others seem…
Explore
64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
Some acquisitions follow the procedures laid down by law or are subject to a competitive process. For example, the acquisition of captive balloons may…
Explore
Control of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
There is virtually no external oversight by Parliament. Internally, the Inspectorate or even certain departments of the armed forces exercise some control, but this…
Explore
65 38/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Control Score: 0 / 100
There is some external verification of the adequacy of the specific specifications of the tender, but it is not comprehensive and it is not…
Explore
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
In theory, personnel involved in the tendering process are subject to restrictions on professional activity [1]. Personnel involved in public procurement must also comply…
Explore
Audit trail Score: 75 / 100
In the area of public procurement, there is ex post control of the regularity of calls for tenders and the award of contracts, which…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Articles 55 to 61 of the Public Procurement Code govern tendering and are publicly available [1]. A guide explaining some of the tendering procedures…
Explore
66 33/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
Article 155 of the Public Procurement Code penalises collusion between bidders. However, these rules are not specific to the defence sector and are widely…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
Bidders found guilty of collusion may be excluded from public procurement by the regulatory body, either permanently or for a specified period [1]. Penalties…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. No verifiable and publicly available cases specifically involving collusion in defence procurement have been officially…
Explore
Training Score: 25 / 100
Procurement officials are occasionally trained to identify collusive practices. The training covers all issues related to corruption and is provided by the Armed Forces…
Explore
67 38/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies and procedures Score: 50 / 100
Public procurement regulations provide for control and evaluation mechanisms . Article 43 of the Public Procurement Code deals with subcontracting. These mechanisms are accompanied…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Changes to contracts are not made public and there is no transparency regarding reporting and the fulfilment of obligations by contractors, suppliers or subcontractors…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
In accordance with public procurement regulations, the defence and security forces inspection services produce reports and monitor suppliers and sometimes subcontractors, although it is…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
Any shortcomings are reported to the hierarchy of the armed forces and ministries. They are dealt with internally. External actors such as the Court…
Explore
68 42/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaint mechanisms Score: 50 / 100
Article 144 of Order No. 2019-679 of 24 July 2019 on the Public Procurement Code states that “Candidates and tenderers who can demonstrate a…
Explore
Effectiveness and accessibility Score: 50 / 100
Mechanisms exist and are inexpensive, although they are rarely used. This is primarily because there are few complaints and, in such cases, those involved…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 25 / 100
Formal complaints are rare because companies prefer parallel and informal channels rather than official referrals, which risk reducing their chances of winning future contracts,…
Explore
69 38/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
The regulations in force on the Ivorian public procurement market allow for the sanctioning and exclusion of companies from public contracts [1, 2]. They…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. Such an indicator is difficult, if not impossible, to assess due to the absence of…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 25 / 100
Sanctions exist in the regulations and companies have already been sanctioned in the civilian sector, particularly in the building and public works sector and…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Defence offset contracts are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1].
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Defence offset contracts are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1].
Explore
71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies and procedures Score: 0 / 100
Defence offset contracts are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1].
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Defence offset contracts are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1].
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Defence offset contracts are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1].
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Defence offset contracts are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1].
Explore
72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Offset contracts in the defence sector are not regulated within the legal framework for public procurement in Côte d’Ivoire [1]. Nor are they common…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
The use of agents is not regulated, but regulations are being developed for the defence sector [1, 2, 3].
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There are no real regulations on the use of agents and intermediaries, so this indicator is marked Not Applicable [1, 2, 3].
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Arms contracts and information on their financing are not made public. Some information leaks to the press and sometimes the amount is mentioned, but…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling countries Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Historically, France has been Côte d’Ivoire’s leading strategic military partner. However, its influence is…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ivorian government often justifies its military acquisitions by citing the modernisation of the…
Explore
Prevalence: internal pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is not enough information to provide more details on this indicator. [1][2][3]
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question