Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

10/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Israel Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
No evidence could be found of a military doctrine that identifies corruption as a strategic issue for the success of operations. The Israel Defence…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ because the IDF does not consider corruption as a strategic issue for operations (1).
Explore
Q52 25/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
In Israel there isn’t any known systematic, regular pre-deployment training in anti-corruption for commanders. Every commander has to get familiar with the ethics code…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that corruption as a strategic issue is taken into account in the forward planning of operations. While operations are planned…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that corruption issues are taken into account in planning or execution for military operations, aside from implicitely as part of…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that Israel deploys trained personnel for corruption monitoring. The soldiers have no specific anti-coruption trainings but before every single mission…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any M&E guidance for military missions on how to monitor corruption risk, aside from generalised oral instructions. (1) (2).
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Israel does not deploy expert personnel for corruption monitoring.
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 25/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There are guidelines for addressing corruption risks but these ones are very broad as part of the general guidelines (1). As such, there aren’t…
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
The IDF soldiers are not specifically trained in relation to corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions, but they do…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Israel does not prohibit the use of PMSCs and regularly outsources military and security…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Legislation provides for some oversight mechanisms. For instance, PMSCs are required to obtain a…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There have been numerous human rights abuses involving PMSCs and Civilian Security Coordinators and…
Explore