Procurement Risk:

Moderate

Score:

54/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 25/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Israel has legislation that covers defence and national security purchases but it is vague…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 25 / 100
There is no special regulation that covers corruption risks during the procurement process, however the procurement process is very strict and effective, so that…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
Procurement is required to be conducted in accordance with the Mandatory Tender Law, however, broad exemptions exist for national security purposes that enable acqusitions…
Explore
Q58 50/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
The procurement cycle is only partially laid out in the Mandatory Tender Regulations (Contracts of the Defence System). The regulations outline the tendering process…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Some policies and processes relating to procurement are disclosed to the public (1) (2) (3). The process for procurement is outlined and explained for…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
There is some evidence that implementation is followed in practice (1) (2) (3). For instance, non-classified Ministry of Defence tenders are advertised on the…
Explore
Q59 42/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
Overall in Israel, the system is independent because there are many inspectors and bureaucracy. There is a body of laws that regulated procurement process…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Though procurement oversight mechanism in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) are active and detailed, (1) (2) (3) there are some loopholes that limit their…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
While decisions of tender committees are made public, including decisions to exempt procurements from tenders, this is not the case in relation to classified…
Explore
Q60 25/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Since 2008, Israel publishes a summary of a five-year plan that includes the main goals of the IDF in terms of personel and resources…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
As mentioned in 60A, for the past 11 years Israel have a five-year plan. This plan is made public and specify many planned purcases…
Explore
Q61 25/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
A former general in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) explained that several defence purchases can not be made public for security reasons (1). However…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 25 / 100
As mentioned in 61A, several purchases are classified and as a result the data from these purchases is not available. On the other hand,…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NEI/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
Standards for companies to operate in the defence sector are set by the MoD and inclue quality assurance standards. (1). There are several committees…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NEI / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Enough Information’ as there is not enough substantial evidence to score this indicator. Evidence of consistent enforcement of anti-corruption…
Explore
Q63 33/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 25 / 100
Procurement requirements are in part derived from the general national defence strategy, however, the security situation in Israel can change from one day to…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Major procurement transactions or purchase of strategic systems may be subject to the approval of the senior MOD management, as well as of the…
Explore
Purchases Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence and Armed Forces generally base purchases on clearly identified and quantified requirements that are mostly publicly available (1) (2). However,…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 75/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 50 / 100
While public tenders are the default, some defence contracts are exempt under the 1993 Tenders Regulations (1). Most (50%+) defence procurements are conducted as…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 100 / 100
All single source and restricted competition procedure contracts must be justified and subject to external scrutiny (such as parliament or the external audit office),…
Explore
Q65 69/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 75 / 100
Ministry of Defence tenders are regulated by the Tender Law and its provisions in relation to conflicts of interest. Officials with a role in…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 100 / 100
There is a comprehensive audit trail of which officials were involved in selecting suppliers and designing tender specification (1) (2). There is external verification…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The tender boards regulations and codes of conduct are public available and transparent (1) (2) (3). The Ministry of Defence provides a lot of…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Tender specifications undergo an examination by the oversight unit within the administration of procurement, and in certain cases by the legal department. As to…
Explore
Q66 88/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
There are laws are in place that prohibit collusion within the defence sector, where collusion is defined as between an official and a bidder…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There is legislation and implementing guidelines empowering procurement officials to exclude companies and senior company officials where there is a conviction or reasonable evidence…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Collusion between bidders and anti-competitive practices are investigated by the investigation department of the Competition Authority. The investigation department has many authorities including the…
Explore
Training Score: 75 / 100
According to an interviewee, procurement officials are trained to identify collusion patterns and report potential malpractice (1). The Committees for the approval and suspension…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 75/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
Formal policies and procedures exist that outline how to monitor, assess and report upon a supplier’s service and or delivery obligations. They include resolution…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Most of the tenders are mostly published online (1) (2) (3) (4) (5). Contract modifications post award are made in accordance with article16 of…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 100 / 100
According to the laws and regulations, officials regularly produce contract monitoring and completion reports (2) (3) (4). These include supplier and subcontractors performance appraisals,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Enough Information’ as there is not enough evidence to score accurately. It is unclear if breaches of contract are…
Explore
Q68 100/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
There are formal mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement (1) (2). Any supplier can file a complaint…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 100 / 100
The complaints mechanisms available to companies seem to be efficient and reasonably priced, and are also regularly used (1) (2). According to an interview,…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 100 / 100
Companies usually believe that they will not be discriminated against in future procurements.There is no evidence of retaliation (1) (2) (3).
Explore
Q69 75/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There is clear legislation and implementing guidelines empowering procurement officials to exclude companies and senior company officials where there is a conviction or credible…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 75 / 100
There are formal procedures such as the exclusion from competition (1). Cases are investigated or prosecuted through formal processes, but undue political influence is…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 50 / 100
An offence can regularly result in a range of sanctions, including prosecution, exclusion from current and future competitions, or other sanctions, including heavy fines…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 75/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Mandatory Industrial Cooperation’ is a requirement for international tenders valued at $5million or greater. Foreign suppliers that win government tenders are required to engage…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 100 / 100
The government imposes anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties during offset contract negotiations (1) (2) (3).
Explore
Q71 69/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
There are formal policies and procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts. This includes procedures for reporting on completed work,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The government makes public some details of offset contracts and programmes. The Industrial Cooperation Authority at the Ministry of Economy and Industry is responsible…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
Suppliers are required to submit annual reports regarding the fulfillment of their undertakings for industrial cooperation to the ICA (1). The progress report includes…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Following approval of the Foreign Supplier’s Implementation Plan, the ICA will conduct regular monitoring of performance of his obligations.If the contract is not adequately…
Explore
Q72 50/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 50 / 100
There is evidence that offset contracts are conducted as open competition. However, it seems that single source contracts are sometimes conducted without clear justification…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 50/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The use of agents and intermediaries is allowed under Israeli law. The 1965 Agency Law and the 2012 Agency Contract Law permit companies’ usage…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
Sanctions are usually applied when policies and laws on the use of agents are violated (1).
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Details of the financing package are not publicly available. There may be no information on whether a financing package exists at all (1). Only…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Some acquisitions are granted as a result of political influence by seller nations, but…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government sometimes justifies purchases by referring to military need (1). No further information…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Some acquisitions are granted as a result of domestic political pressures, but this is…
Explore