Political Risk:

Very High

Score:

28/100

Collapse
1 0/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
There is currently no elected parliament in Mali. However, the National Transitional Council, a body whose members are appointed, functions in the role previously…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
In practice, these powers conferred on them by law are not sufficiently exercised. The defence committee can examine the defense budget but only when…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Both the defence institutions and the executive branch regularly undermine control of defence policy. While this has been the case with the National Transitional…
Explore
2 45/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The Commission, exercising its prerogatives, can question experts on certain issues to gain understanding and clarification. It has the right of inspection through its…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
The National Transition Council consists of officers from the defence and security forces, along with civilians who have worked on security issues. Most members…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 75 / 100
The CNT Defence Committee plays a role in budget development, management, and overseeing expenditure and activities. The work of the committee is reported to…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The defence, security and civil protection commission of the national transitional council, either in theory or according to the constitution and the internal regulations…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The law authorises parliament the possibility to conduct long-term investigations into ongoing activities, including operations.[1][2] However, in practice, there is no evidence that some…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Sometimes draft laws are subject to amendments by members of the CNT.[1][2][3] These amendments may…
Explore
3 38/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
Outside the formal consultation process, there have been several occasions when, with its own funding or funding from partners, the Security Sector Reform Commission…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 0 / 100
Questions related to national security policies or security strategy are generally only discussed after their adoption by the legislative body. Indeed, during the development…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 50 / 100
Some issues related to defence and security were debated within the framework of the national foundations of the refoundation during the inter-Malian dialogue in…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Defence policy documents are generally accessible.[1] Although the national security strategy document has not yet been adopted, validation workshops have been organised with members…
Explore
4 58/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 100 / 100
There is no official policy requiring collaboration between defence and security institutions and CSOs. However, the National Security Sector Reform Strategy and its 2022-2024…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
The constitutions of 1992 and 2023, the transition charter, and various laws and policies guarantee the functioning of CSOs while regulating the nature of…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
As part of the implementation of the security sector reform [1][2] and the national strategy for security sector reform along with its action plan,[3]…
Explore
5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Mali ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in April 2008.[1] It should be noted that the country is neither a producer nor…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
The country has minor compliance defects with the anti-corruption conventions on corruption that it has ratified. These defects are related to how policies based…
Explore
6 38/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 25 / 100
Previously, CSOs, the media, academics, and activists regularly led and guided debates on issues related to defence arising from current events and their centres…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
The government engages in discussions with the public at different levels, although not regularly. Over the past two years, it has involved all ministers,…
Explore
7 25/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
In December 2023, the government adopted the national anti-corruption strategy (Strategie Nationale de Lutte contre la Corruption or SNLCC), accompanied by an action plan…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 0 / 100
There is no specific action plan for the defence sector regarding to the fight against corruption, nor has any initiative been launched to develop…
Explore
8 0/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of such units existing or of any efforts to establish them.[1] However, the General Inspectorate of the Armed Forces and…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
There is no such unit within the institutional structure of the defence and security sector. It is the inspectorates that handle these matters, along…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
There is no such unit within the institutional structure of the defence and security sector. It is the inspectorates that handle these matters, along…
Explore
9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. From the 2024 edition of the Malimeter, an annual opinion poll conducted by the…
Explore
10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
There is no record of any specific corruption risk assessment that has been commissioned or conducted in the past 2-3 years. Worse, the environment…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
No risk assessment is carried out, this sub-indicator is marked as not applicable.[1][2]
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
No risk assessment is carried out, this sub-indicator is marked as not applicable.[1][2]
Explore
11 8/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 25 / 100
It appears that the Ministry of Defence plans its needs, which includes planning acquisitions. However, the planning process is neither inclusive nor accessible. These…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Despite having a comprehensive legal framework,[1] there is a lack of transparency in the acquisition planning process since it is not made public,[2][3] and…
Explore
External oversight Score: 0 / 100
Despite having a comprehensive legal framework,[1] there is a lack of transparency in the acquisition planning process since it is not made public,[2][3] and…
Explore
12 50/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
Once the finance law is adopted, the defence budget appears in the same way as other sectors and is broken down into the General…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 50 / 100
The CNT receives the defence budget, like all other budgets, only at the beginning of the budget session based on Article 125 of the…
Explore
13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
There is a defence commission within the National Transition Council which has among its prerogatives, according to the constitution and internal regulations of the…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 25 / 100
In practice, due to the composition of the CNT’s defence, security, and civil protection commission (composed mainly of military, gendarmerie, and police officers), it…
Explore
14 17/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 25 / 100
The finance law allows us to know estimate the share of the budget allocated to the defence and security sector, as well as provide…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
As mentioned, the budget is broken down into different categories: the general administration of the army (personnel, goods ansd services, investments, acquisitions), military operations,…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
Overall information on the expenditure budget is provided to citizens, the media, and civil society; but it remains extremely difficult for the components mentioned…
Explore
15 42/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
There is a comprehensive record of all revenue sources, the amounts collected, and the allocation of these revenues may lack readability.[1] The main source…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Control structures such as the accounts section of the Supreme Court, the general control of public services, the general inspection, the office of the…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Public control of non-governmental sources of financing for the defence and security sector proves to be difficult because this type of financing is not…
Explore
16 0/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
Control and audit structures very rarely intervene to control and/or audit the expenditure of the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs. The Inspectorate General…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence of an internal audit of defence ministry expenditure, this sub-indicator should be marked Not as Applicable.[1][2]
Explore
External scrutiny Score: NA / 100
There are no traces of external control of the internal audit function concerning the expenditure of the Ministry of Defence. There is also no…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
There is no internal audit of the defence ministry’s expenditure, and no internal audit report of the Ministry of Defence’s spending has been made…
Explore
17 6/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 25 / 100
Two institutions are responsible for external auditing of defence expenditure: the Accounts Section of the Supreme Court (Section des comptes de la Cour Suprême…
Explore
Independence Score: 0 / 100
Based on articles 16, 23 and 31 of Law 2021-069 on the office of the Auditor General (Bureau Du verificateur General or BVG), the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is almost never an external audit of the defence and security sectors and when this is the case the reports are neither intended…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
There is almost never an external audit of the defence and security sectors, and when such audits do occur, the reports are neither intended…
Explore
18 92/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
The law prohibits defence institutions from holding controlling or financial interests in commercial activities that exploit the country’s natural resources.[1][2] Furthermore, the constitution confines…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no proven case of involvement by defence institutions in commercial activities related to the exploitation of natural resources; the State participation in…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 75 / 100
There might be some isolated cases of individuals being involved, but the activity is totaly illicit. It emerges from the general status of the…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that such interests exist so this indicator is marked Not Applicable. It emerges from the general status of the military…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that such interests exist so this indicator is marked Not Applicable. It emerges from the general status of the military…
Explore
19 0/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 0 / 100
There is a high probability of organised crime penetrating the area, and this has been confirmed to be the case. Indeed, accusations of involvement…
Explore
Government response Score: 0 / 100
The government is likely aware of and even possibly accommodates criminal penetration into the defence and security sector for various reasons. Depending on the…
Explore
20 0/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 0 / 100
In Mali, there is no public evidence of the existence of an officially designated unit within the national police specifically responsible for combating organised…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
Since no evidence of an effective policing function being exercised over the defence services to investigate corruption or organised crime has been found, this…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
There are some cases of corruption being investigated in the defence sector, but no mention of a spefic policy function that investigate the defence…
Explore
21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The Defence Committee is not able to supervise the activities, operations and functioning of the National State Security Agency (ANSE) – the country’s main…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
There is no independent oversight of the intelligence service’s policies, administration and budgets in Mali, so this indicator is marked Not Applicable. Indeed, in…
Explore
22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
The selection criteria for high-level posts in the intelligence services are at the discretion of the President of the Republic (President of the Transition).…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
According to the founding decree, in particular article 9, the National State Security Agency is placed under the direct authority of the President of…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
The appointment and promotion processes for intelligence officials are unclear and constitute another potential catalyst for illicit processes. Such appointments appear to have been…
Explore
23 100/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Mali voted for the adoption of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), signed on 3 June 2013, and ratified it on 63 December 2013.[1] The…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
Mali has recently strengthened its legal framework in the fight against illicit manufacturing and trafficking of firearms [1]. In addition to the 2004 law,[2]…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Mali is not an arms exporter, so this sub-indicator is scored Not Applicable.[1] [2]
Explore
76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The country does not have a framework for regulating lobbying activities,.or it does have a framework for regulating pressure groups, but the defence sector…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This legal framework does not exist for Mali, there is no text available in this sense, neither at the level of the general secretariat…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This legal framework does not exist for Mali, there is no text available in this sense, neither at the level of the general secretariat…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This legal framework does not exist for Mali, there is no text available in this sense, neither at the level of the general secretariat…
Explore

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Expand
Q1 NA/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Q2 NA/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Q3 NA/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Q4 NA/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Q5 NA/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Q6 NA/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Q7 NA/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Q8 NA/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Q9 NA/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Q10 NA/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 NA/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Q12 NA/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Q13 NA/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Q14 NA/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Q15 NA/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Q16 NA/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Q17 NA/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 NA/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 NA/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Q20 NA/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 NA/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Q22 NA/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 NA/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 NA/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question