Political Risk:

Very High

Score:

32/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 42/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
According to the constitution, the parliament (National Assembly), determines the fundamental principles and general organisation of the defence and security sector². It also approves…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
In parliament, the military budget is first examined by the Defence and Security Committee. The CDSPC invites the directors of all the main divisions…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
There is no evidence that the military undermines parliamentary scrutiny of defence policy. However, the fact that the CDSPC is chaired by the president’s…
Explore
Q2 46/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Mali has a Defence and Security Committee (CDSPC) tasked with overseeing and scrutinising defence issues. The CDSPC examines the annual defence budget. The committee…
Explore
Expertise Score: 0 / 100
The committee comprises 14 members. Six different political parties are represented on the commission: RPM, Adéma-PASJ, PARENA, ASMA, SADI and the UM-RDA.⁶ Of the…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 100 / 100
Mali has a Defence and Security Committee (CDSPC) tasked with overseeing and scrutinising defence issues. The CDSPC and the National Assembly debated and scrutinised…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
The committee occasionally issues amendments to budgets and recommendations, but not on a regular basis. The committee can propose amendments to defence legislation (including…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that the committee conducts or commissions any long-term investigations into defence matters. This was confirmed by a member of the…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
Ministries sometimes incorporate recommendations into practice, but not regularly. The president’s son heads up the committee and thus there is limited scope for the…
Explore
Q3 50/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
The government has adopted a formal defence and security policy. It began with the Supreme Defence Council adopting a draft National Defence and Security…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 50 / 100
The LOPM clearly outlines the problems facing the army and elucidates the five-year spending plan. The legislation stipulates that the equipment purchased and the…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 50 / 100
As part of the ‘Accord Pour la Paix et la Reconciliation au Mali’, the government has created local consultative security committees to discuss the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The majority of media coverage of the detailed plans within the LOPM came after the law was passed, indicating that public debate did not…
Explore
Q4 42/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 25 / 100
There is no evidence of the existence of formal or informal policies that require state organisations to be open towards CSOs on matters of…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
The constitution provides for freedom of association (without detailed protection provisions), although the law prohibits associations deemed immoral. CSOs and media organisations are generally…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 50 / 100
Defence and security institutions are seeking (or are beginning to seek) CSO engagement from a range of CSOs, but not on corruption issues. At…
Explore
Q5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
The country has yet to industrialise and thus does not have any kind of domestic defence manufacturing industry to speak of. It does not…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
In 2014, the government enacted a law that requires all civil servants, including military personnel, to declare their assets.² ⁴ However, members of parliament…
Explore
Q6 88/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
Given the country’s long-running security crisis and the capitulation of the Malian armed forces in 2012, defence remains a hot topic in the media…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 75 / 100
As part of the ‘Accord Pour la Paix et la Reconciliation au Mali’, the government has created local consultative security committees to discuss the…
Explore
Q7 0/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 0 / 100
The present government has taken measures to combat corruption, but has not formulated a dedicated plan as such. In 2014, the government enacted a…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: NA / 100
Mali does not have an anti-corruption policy that applies to the defence sector. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Q8 25/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 50 / 100
A senior security governance professional told the assessor that the Inspector General of the armed forces has a constitutional mandate to conduct audits of…
Explore
Independence Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. The current Inspector General, Ibrahim Dahirou Dembélé, was appointed in…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
As highlighted in 8A, the Inspector General does not have an explicit mandate to tackle corruption, meaning that the position is largely ineffective in…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no public trust. Here is one example of the public’s widespread view…
Explore
Q10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
In 2014, the Minister of Economy and Finance and the Minister of Justice and Human Rights requested that the IMF conduct an assessment of…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
There is no regular schedule for risk assessments. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
No risk assessments were conducted after 2014. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 33/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 25 / 100
The LOPM provides for USD2.3 billion of investment for the armed forces and is set to recruit an additional 10,000 personnel between 2015 and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The military in Mali holds a highly privileged position compared with other sectors when determining the allocation of resources. Arms acquisition requests are required…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
A member of the National Assembly’s Defence and Security Committee told the assessor that not only did the CDSPC scrutinise the LOPM, but that…
Explore
Q12 75/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The 2018 budget contains a superficial breakdown of defence spending into various categories: personnel, materials and functioning, travel and operations, communications and energy, other…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The Malian fiscal year runs from January to December. The 2018 budget, which provides a basic breakdown of proposed annual defence spending, was published…
Explore
Q13 63/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
In parliament, the military budget is first examined by the Defence and Security Committee. The CDSPC invites the directors of all the main divisions…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 25 / 100
SIPRI’s study in 2006 found that “there is little evidence that the process of budgeting is either transparent or consultative. State budgeting is still…
Explore
Q14 42/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The two most recent finalised defence budgets have been made publically available and widely published by domestic media. Detailed figures are provided, but explanations…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The 2018 budget contains a breakdown of defence spending into various categories: personnel, materials and functioning, travel and operations, communications and energy, other expenses,…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 25 / 100
The US Department of State determines that the Malian government generally affords citizens and noncitizens, including foreign media, access to government information.¹ It notes,…
Explore
Q15 0/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
SIPRI’s report from 2006 notes that the use of off-budget income to supplement defence spending is routine.¹ The Malian armed and security forces have…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There are several internal and external bodies tasked with auditing the finances of the Defence Ministry (see Q16). However, there is no evidence that…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The failure of the government to publish accounts of the income derived by the Ministry of Defence from participating in projects such as peacekeeping…
Explore
Q16 6/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 25 / 100
According to the World Bank’s 2013 report on financial management in Mali’s security forces, Mali’s expenditure chain is highly formalised, but provides little autonomy…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
Officially, the authorities should exercise control on aspects of public administration related to the management of public resources. There are three categories of control:…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The World Bank stresses that the Bureau du Vérificateur Général (BVG), created in 2004, has never carried out a compliance verification with the Ministry…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
The absence of any meaningful or regular internal or external audits, as shown in 16A, 16B and 16C, indicates that the ministry is not…
Explore
Q17 0/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
As noted in Q16, Mali’s military and internal security forces are in practice not subject to external oversight. All of the external monitoring bodies…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
Mali’s military and internal security forces are in practice not subject to external oversight. All of the external monitoring bodies avoid using their oversight…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Mali’s military and internal security forces are in practice not subject to external oversight. All of the external monitoring bodies avoid using their oversight…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
Mali’s military and internal security forces are in practice not subject to external oversight. All of the external monitoring bodies avoid using their oversight…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 40/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The assessor finds no legislation that explicitly outlaws military personnel from holding financial interests in natural resources exploitation. However, the 1961 Penal Code (amended…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is evidence that the armed forces generate revenues from commercial activities, but these do not include the exploitation of natural resources.¹ The armed…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
The assessor finds no legislation that explicitly outlaws military personnel from holding financial interests in natural resources exploitation. There is no mention of military…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The absence of any legal framework relating to the potential financial involvement of defence institutions or security personnel in the extractives sector renders any…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The absence of any legal framework relating to the potential financial involvement of defence institutions or security personnel in the extractives sector means that…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 25/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 0 / 100
The northern parts of Mali have been an important area of transit for smugglers for at least the past ten years following decades of…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
Since the collapse of the Malian state in 2012 and the election of IBK in 2013, reports of drug trafficking have dried up amid…
Explore
Q20 0/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 0 / 100
There is no unit within the national police force that deals with organised crime and corruption within defence services. The Ministry of Internal Security…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
As indicated in 20A, there is no evidence to indicate that there is a unit within the national police force to deal with corruption…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
As indicated in 20A, there is no evidence to indicate that there is a unit within the national police force to deal with corruption…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The budget of the armed and security forces does not include the DGSE, the country’s main intelligence service.¹ It is unclear whether the budget…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
There is no standing parliamentary committee vested with any responsibility or power for overseeing DGSE operations, organisation, budget or activities.⁵ A member of the…
Explore
Q22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
Mali’s intelligence service, the Direction Generale de la Sécurité d’Etat (DGSE), is primarily involved in counter-terrorism operations and works with French intelligence services.³ ⁴…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
In 2013, shortly after his election, President Keita appointed Colonel Moussa Diawara as the Director General of the DGSE. Diawara previously served as IBK’s…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
There is no information in the public domain relating to the nature of any vetting process in place for senior intelligence appointments. To appoint…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 100/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Mali voted for the adoption of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), signed on 3 June 2013, and ratified it on 6 December 2013 (1).
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
It has complied with each of the three ATT articles it is required to. Mali does not manufacture or officially export arms. It is…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Mali does not manufacture arms for export, thus there is no precedent of parliament deliberating an upcoming sale of arms by the state. Therefore,…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Mali has no framework for regulating lobbying activity of defence institutions.
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
Mali has no framework for regulating lobbying activity of defence institutions. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
Mali has no framework for regulating lobbying activity of defence institutions. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
Mali has no framework for regulating lobbying activity of defence institutions. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore