Political Risk:

Very Low

Score:

83/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 83/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
According to the Dutch Constitution, the Government has ‘supreme authority’ over the armed forces (Article 92.2), Parliament has the power to approve or reject…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
Parliament engages in legislation regarding security and defence. Existing laws pertaining to defence are amended in accordance with broader national laws [1] and major…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
There are rules in force relating to the coercion and undue influence of members of Parliament, but they remain vague, and sanctions are enforced…
Explore
Q2 92/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Defence consists of 25 permanent members. The Committee is active in scrutinising budgets, missions, personnel management, policy…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
Some of the members of the Committee have expertise in the defence sector, but most do not [1]. Though a civil servant working for…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 100 / 100
Sections 40 and 41 of the Committee Rules of Procedure do not stipulate a time frame for reviewing major policies and decisions [1]. However,…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
Section 33 of the Committee Rules of Procedure does not stipulate a time frame for frequency of meetings [1]. However, in practice, the Committee…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 100 / 100
The Committee conducts long-term investigations on current activities and operations [1]. In 2020, aside from budgetary consultations, the Committee focussed on discussing major defence…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
Recommendations are articulated by the Committee via motions in the House of Representatives [1]. The Committee also provides recommendations to the Ministries first through…
Explore
Q3 69/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 75 / 100
The Netherlands has a culture of openly debating Dutch defence policy and security strategy. Broad policy is publicly outlined in a number of documents,…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence seeks to address a wide range of topics in strategic documents, including the clear articulation of the security threats facing…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 25 / 100
There is no recent evidence of the existence of formal public consultations on defence or security policy. The most recent online public consultation in…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The public can easily access documents pertaining to defence policy or national security strategy online [1,2]. However, documents are not open to public scrutiny…
Explore
Q4 100/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 100 / 100
The Dutch government’s policies exhibit openness towards CSOs. Such policies require the engagement in strategic dialogue on goals and results with CSOs, the exchange…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 100 / 100
CSOs are able to operate free from government interference and intimidation [1]. Freedom of expression in the Netherlands is protected by Article 7 of…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 100 / 100
Defence and security institutions regularly work with CSOs on corruption issues. For example, civilian representatives of government have regularly been involved in discussions with…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands ratified both the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in 2001 and 2006 respectively [1,2]. In 2018,…
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
The Netherlands has had minor issues regarding compliance with both the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the United Nations Convention against Corruption. In 2015, the…
Explore
Q6 100/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands has a culture of openly debating Dutch defence policy and security strategy though journalism, activism and public discussions. As outlined in Question…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 100 / 100
The government engages in regular debate with academia, opinion-formers and civil society about defence issues through workshops, panel discussions and private meetings. Last year,…
Explore
Q7 100/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
The model approach for basic standards of integrity’ obliges all Dutch government organisations in public administration and the police to pursue an integrity policy…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 100 / 100
The policy reflects the institutional weaknesses in the system, notably by describing corruption risks that are (somewhat) specific to the Ministry of Defence. This…
Explore
Q8 67/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 100 / 100
The main institution responsible for integrity within defence and security is the Central Defence Integrity Organisation (COID). The role of the COID is to…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Central Defence Integrity Organisation (COID) is part of the Ministry of Defence and is therefore not explicitly independent. Following a series of recommendations…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The staff within the COID attend training courses that cover theory, examples and risks of corruption within defence [1]. Confidential advisors must continuously keep…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2016 (latest known data), contains ‘positive’ or ‘mediocre’ ratings…
Explore
Q10 50/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 50 / 100
Risk assessments on integrity are conducted by the Central Defence Integrity Organisation (COID) as a means to highlight vulnerabilities to commanders and supervisors [1].…
Explore
Regularity Score: 50 / 100
A form of risk assessment is conducted regularly in the sense that all military personnel and most civilians working in defence must undergo security…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. As stated previously, integrity risk assessments have a broader scope than anti-corruption alone and as…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 75/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands Court of Audit oversees the Defence Materiel Process (DMP), which clearly outlines internal acquisition processes for projects costing more than 25 million…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Extensive information on the Defence Materiel Process is publicly accessible online [1,2]. Information on acquisition processes is available to the public through the annual…
Explore
External oversight Score: 75 / 100
Strong external audits to assess long-term acquisition plans and their legitimacy are only conducted if the project is designated a ‘major project’ by the…
Explore
Q12 88/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The defence budget contains a somewhat comprehensive overview of expenditures across the Ministry of Defence. It is completely public and relatively transparent. The 2020…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The House of Representatives receives an accurate defence budget proposal on Budget Day, which is on the third Tuesday of September, giving the legislature…
Explore
Q13 100/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Defence consists of 25 permanent members. The Committee is active in scrutinising budgets and acquisition decisions [1].…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 100 / 100
Members of the Standing Committee on Defence do introduce amendments to the budget. For example, a member of the Committee introduced an amendment to…
Explore
Q14 83/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 100 / 100
The approved defence budget is made publicly available and is available in a disaggregated form. The document contains tables designed for general public overview…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
The vast majority of the approved defence budget is fully disclosed to the public, including media and civil society actors. However, some expenses, whose…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 50 / 100
Citizens, civil society and the media can request additional information about the MoD budget by contacting the communications department by phone, letter or email…
Explore
Q15 92/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
Article 105 of the Constitution requires all sources of income to be published and scrutinised [1]. The annual defence budget shows income figures associated…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Article 105 of the Constitution also requires the balance sheet to be approved by the Court of Audit and presented to the States General…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The public scrutinises the income of the Ministry of Defence, specifically that which is earned through the sale of equipment and arms. For example,…
Explore
Q16 94/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The Central Government Audit Service (ADR) is the independent internal auditor of the Dutch government, including the Ministry of Defence [1]. The Government Accounts…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 100 / 100
Reports written by the Central Government Audit Service (ADR) are publicly disclosed [1]. The Minister of Finance sends an overview to the House of…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands Court of Audit is an independent, external organisation that audits all ministries and other public organisations, including the Central Government Audit Service…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry regularly addresses audit reports in discussions and implements findings. For instance, the Central Government Audit Service’s (ADR) 2019 audit of the Ministry…
Explore
Q17 100/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands Court of Audit is an independent, external organisation that audits all ministries and other public organisations, including military and defence spending [1].…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands Court of Audit is a High Council of State and is an independent institution separate from the government [1]. The Court’s budget…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Audits by the Netherlands Court of Audit are published online and include a reasonable amount of detail on findings and methodologies [1]. For example,…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
In 76% of cases, the Ministry of Defence makes commitments following a recommendation from the Court of Audit [1]. The Ministry of Defence is…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 55/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The Dutch government is not prohibited from having controlling or financial interests in the exploitation of natural resources, including natural gas, which is the…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 25 / 100
There is evidence that the Ministry of Defence has controlling or financial interests in natural resource exploitation in the Netherlands. On a broader government…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence to suggest the involvement of defence personnel in the natural resource industry. The Code of Conduct for Defence stipulates that…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Government interests in natural resource exploitation are publicly declared through the Ministry of Finance’s Annual Report on the ‘Management of State Participations’, which details…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The annual report on the ‘Management of State Participations’ is presented to the House of Representatives for debate alongside a letter from the Minister…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 88/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 75 / 100
In most of the military there is little proof of organised crime being involved. One exception so far is the Marechaussee, who due to…
Explore
Government response Score: 100 / 100
All military personnel and most civilians working in defence must undergo security clearance processes administered by the Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) prior…
Explore
Q20 100/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
The Royal Dutch Military Police (KMAR) investigates all reports of organised crime and corruption in the defence services and works with the Public Prosecution…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Royal Dutch Military Police (KMAR) is part of the Netherlands armed forces and therefore the Secretary of Defence is responsible for its management.…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
There are numerous recent examples of the military police (KMAR) formally investigating cases of alleged misconduct or accidents in the armed forces [1,2,3]. Though…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 100/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Dutch Review Committee on the Intelligence and Security Services (CTIVD) oversees the legality of the Dutch intelligence services – the General Intelligence and…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
The Dutch Review Committee on the Intelligence and Security Services (CTIVD) has access to classified information and releases reports with classified appendices so as…
Explore
Q22 100/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 100 / 100
Recruitment processes for senior positions within the General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and the Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) are subject to…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 100 / 100
The numerous stakeholders involved in the TMG vacancy process prevent undue influence in the appointment of candidates to top positions in the AIVD and…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 100 / 100
Numerous vetting procedures accompany the recruitment and appointment process for senior positions within the intelligence services. The General Administrative Service Bureau is external to…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 75/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands was one of the first countries to sign and ratify the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) [1]. It was signed on June 3,…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
The Netherlands’ export licensing criteria adhere to the ATT principles of compliance with international embargoes, non-cooperation in violations of international humanitarian law or human…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The Netherlands has a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions. The export licences are only granted by the Minister of Foreign Trade and Development…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 19/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
Lobbying activity is not comprehensively or robustly regulated in the Netherlands and only limited mechanisms exist. The main rule impacting lobby activity is a…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: 25 / 100
Limited mechanisms exist for public disclosure of lobby meetings. In 2016, the cabinet began publishing relevant agenda appointments with persons and/or subjects online [1].…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: 25 / 100
There is a public register available for lobbyists within the House of Representatives, but it is voluntary and only covers in-person meetings held at…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: 0 / 100
No oversight entity exists with a specific mandate to oversee lobbying activities. The Court of Audit and the Central Government Audit Service conduct accountability…
Explore