Procurement Risk:

Moderate

Score:

66/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 75/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. A number of regulations shape the legal framework for anti-corruption in defence and security…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 100 / 100
National legislation includes laws on corruption. The Procurement Act 2012 states that ‘a contracting authority or a special-sector company shall take appropriate measures to…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Rules on corruption within procurement legislation are generally adhered to. However, there are strong grey areas that may draw that conclusion into question (e.g.…
Explore
Q58 67/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The Defence Materiel Process (DMP) regulates the decision-making process for defence materials, IT systems and infrastructure costing more than 25 million euros. The DMP…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Defence and Security Procurement Act mandates that its provisions – including those on transparency and open-source information – apply to the entire life…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
The annual Defence Project Overview shows evidence of procurement processes working in practice. For each procurement project, the overview shows the needs assessment, connection…
Explore
Q59 92/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
There are three oversight mechanisms for the defence procurement cycle. The first is the formal political cycle, as parliamentary approval is required for acquisitions…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 75 / 100
The material for each project in the annual Defence Projects Overview includes a list of parliamentary briefings and consultations that have been conducted in…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Parliamentary papers detailing discussions on procurement are available to the public, as well as commission reports by the Parliamentary Committee on Defence [1,2]. The…
Explore
Q60 100/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 100 / 100
Comprehensive forward planning documents have been released in recent years, which detail planning for potential purchases up to 2035. Published in 2018, the Defence…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 100 / 100
The annual Defence Project Overview details current plans for defence purchases up to and including 2025 [1]. This overview shows the financial planning for…
Explore
Q61 63/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The Ministry of Defence provides information on defence purchases over 25 million euros through the Defence Projects Overview, which is released annually [1]. The…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 50 / 100
Data on bigger defence purchases, which were awarded on the basis of EU classic or defence procurement directives, are published in TED (Tenders Electronic…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 50/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
The Ministry of Defence does not require companies to have a formal and publicly declared anti-corruption programme in place in order to bid for…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 75 / 100
Though public procurement in the Netherlands draws significant public scrutiny, media reports do not suggest that there is a widespread problem with corruption amongst…
Explore
Q63 92/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 75 / 100
A two-way corroboration can be seen between the defence strategy documents and the procurement reporting documents, in that the defence strategy documents outline the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
There are three oversight mechanisms for the defence procurement cycle that monitor how purchases align with the overall national security strategy. The first is…
Explore
Purchases Score: 100 / 100
Strategy is systemically used to justify purchases. In addition to the strategy detailed for each purchase in the Defence Projects Overview (see Q63A), online…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
There is insufficient evidence to score this indicator, besides legislation; as such, it is marked ‘Not Enough Information’. There are three types of contract…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 75 / 100
Procurement processes are overseen by the Central Government Audit Service and the Netherlands Court of Audit, however, while these bodies can monitor, question and…
Explore
Q65 44/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
Procurement officials, including those involved in tenders, are subject to the Code of Conduct for civilian personnel, which restricts (financial) conflicts of interest, unauthorised…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 75 / 100
The Central Government Audit Service, which audits all government organisations, including those involved in defence tenders, states that audit trails can be deduced and…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Code of Conduct that applies to civilian and military defence personnel covers personnel who work as tender officials [1]. However, there is a…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Procurement processes are overseen by the Central Government Audit Service and the Netherlands Court of Audit, however, while these bodies can monitor, question and…
Explore
Q66 56/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Collusion is prohibited under several laws and guidelines. Chapter 3 of the Dutch Competition Act prohibits agreements between enterprises, decisions of associations of enterprises…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
The consequences for violation of the Competition Act for companies include fines, penalties, ‘binding instructions to comply with the law’, and/or make a company…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
The role of the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) is to supervise market competition, enforce consumer law and collaborate with legislators on…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
The Netherlands Competition Authority publishes information for procurement officers on detecting and preventing collusion. The advice includes information of the types of ‘cartels’ and…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 67/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
Policies that outline reporting or delivery obligations exist under the general terms and conditions for procurement contracts [1]. Article 9 of the General Government…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
For purchases over 25 million euros, the Defence Projects Overview (published annually online) details financial progress and timelines as well as any major changes…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
Officials produce contract monitoring and completion reports for all contracts, but these are not public and their contents are unknown. For materiel that is…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator, due to a lack of data to assess enforcement in practice. Article 21 of the…
Explore
Q68 83/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
There are three formal complaints mechanisms through which companies can report (alleged) malpractice by other companies, the contracting parties (Ministry of Defence) or third…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 100 / 100
Reporting (potential) malpractice to the COID and the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets is free of charge, as is submitting an objection through…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
Despite the fact that the number of reports against the government as a contracting authority is growing year by year, there is still a…
Explore
Q69 75/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Defence and Security Procurement Act (Article 2.76) states that a contracting authority must exclude a candidate who has (previously) been convicted of fraud,…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
There is some evidence that cases of corruption may be subject to undue political influence. Some cases suggest that not all cases of alleged…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Sanctions were most notoriously applied in 2017, when a corruption and bribery scandal erupted within…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 25/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Offset contracts (referred to in Dutch law and policy as ‘industrial participation’) are permitted by law under Article 346 of the Treaty on the…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
The Defence Industry Strategy, cited as the key policy document regarding industrial participation, makes no reference to the need to prevent or monitor corruption…
Explore
Q71 50/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
The leading policy document on industrial participation (offset contracts) does not outline reporting or delivery obligations for offset contracts [1]. However, such policies do…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The Commissariat for Military Production maintains an industrial participation database where the public can search for companies that are required to place offset orders…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 75 / 100
A report on the progress and outcomes of industrial participation policy is submitted to Parliament once every two years. This report includes details on…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Article 21 of the General Government Terms and Conditions for Public Service Contracts states that…
Explore
Q72 75/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 75 / 100
The Defence & Security Procurement Law enshrines competition as a procurement principle in all cases except in extreme crises (Article 2:23). [1] The circumstances…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NEI/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 50 / 100
The Defence and Security Procurement Act contains provisions on the use of agents and third parties in the procurement cycle (Article 2.82) [1]. Article…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Currently, no evidence exists to suggest that sanctions are not applied in accordance with policy…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 50/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence publishes the Defence Projects Overview annually, which details progress stages, strategy/policy framework, changes, timelines, implementation and corresponding parliamentary papers, for…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is little evidence of major political influence by selling nations on acquisition decisions…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. For procurement processes over 25 million euros, the procurement preparation phase (Phase D) mandates…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is little evidence of major domestic political influence on acquisition decisions and such…
Explore