Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

8/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Nigeria has a Public Procurement Act (PPA) which governs all procurements by public entities.…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement Act of 2007 expressly excludes the defence sector and is subject to the president’s discretion (1). In practice, this suggests that…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The case of the NIA Director and the IKOYI money suggests that there are regular exceptions to the procurement requirements in legislation and that…
Explore
Q58 0/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is not formalised or disclosed to the public. Occasionally, there may be some limited disclosure for what is considered ‘non-sensitive’…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is not formalised or disclosed to the public. Occasionally, there may be some limited disclosure for what is considered ‘non-sensitive’…
Explore
Implementation Score: 0 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is not formalised or disclosed to the public. Occasionally, there may be some limited disclosure for what is considered ‘non-sensitive’…
Explore
Q59 8/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The National Security Strategy makes some reference to procurement. However, there is no legal or regulatory framework which encompasses the numerous security agencies and…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is some evidence of increased oversight activity; however, there has been no change to the ambiguity over the abridged procurement processes which deviate…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
There is some evidence of increased oversight activity. The publication of the CADEP report does suggest more activity (1). The oversight of the Defence…
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no forward planning as far as potential defence expenditure is concerned. The priorities shift from year to year. What is clear is…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
Recurrent expenditure may be subject to planned purchases as these appear in the budget from year to year. However, capital expenditures in the defence…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Major and significant defence purchases are sometimes reported in the media. The aggregate spend might also be reported. However, there are significant gaps in…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data concerning defence spending is rarely in the public domain. Subjects such as technical specifications and price issues are largely undisclosed; neither is any…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
Given that the process is shrouded in secrecy and that the PPA 2007 does not apply, there are no laws or procedures disclosed to…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
Because there are no policies for compliance of contracts, this indicator is marked Not Applicable. Details of expenditures of the Nigerian Defence Budgets are…
Explore
Q63 17/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
The procurement requirements are difficult to assess as they are subject to considerable secrecy. The National Audit Office has the responsibility to audit the…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
In theory, scrutiny is conducted by the National Audit Office. However, the reports are subject to considerable delay and not accessible to the public.…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
The connection between certain purchases and the national strategy is not always clear. Some purchases appear to be reactions to security crises and not…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence.
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
The Ministry of Defence website contains no information regarding competition to provide defence-related goods and services. The Ministry of Defence states on its website…
Explore
Q65 13/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
While conflict rules do exist as a part of departmental guidelines, adherence to the rules is difficult to determine as senior military officials have…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
Depending on the threshold, the Bureau of Public Procurement may need to give a certificate of “no objection” which ought to be an independent…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
“At present, high-ranking politicians are able to influence the outcome of the procurement process by putting undue pressure on civil servants who feel unable…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Oversight agencies such as the Auditor General’s Office have limited powers to request documents and interview defence personnel. Furthermore, the auditor general’s most recent…
Explore
Q66 33/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The PPA 2007 S.15 expressly excludes the defence sector from its ambit subject to presidential discretion (1). Sources confirmed that Tender Boards are subject…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 25 / 100
The Procurement Act expressly excludes the defence sector from its ambit subject to presidential discretion. In discussions with a source at the MOD it…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Based on the investigation and prosecution of former defence chiefs following the Buhari administration’s creation of a Panel to investigate the defence sector, it…
Explore
Training Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence.
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
Although the PPA 2007 outlines clear policies and procedures on how to monitor, assess, and report on suppliers’ service given that the application of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There may be specifications in the contract which should be used to measure or maintain scrutiny. However, the information available suggests that there is…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
IIt was certainly the case that procurement officers were only formally involved in the procurement process to approve certain transactions irrespective of the quality…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Before 2016 it appears that very few breaches of contract were acted upon at all. “The U.S. effort to sell weapons to the Nigerian…
Explore
Q68 17/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 50 / 100
Given that the complaints mechanism under the PPA 2007 does not apply to the defence sector it would appear that there is no formal…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 0 / 100
Although a structured complaints procedure is included under the PPA 2007 to the courts, it is rarely used as litigation is costly and may…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 0 / 100
The dispute resolution system is not being used for a variety of reasons. Fear of retaliation in the form of the loss of future…
Explore
Q69 25/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. The PPA 2007, contains numerous procurement-related offences that contain sanctions…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
Following the Buhari administration’s ascension in 2015, several high-profile investigations were conducted into military procurement. Several high-ranking officials are currently on trial for a…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
As the criminal trials are still on-going and have not been concluded, no sanctions have been imposed at this point. In the cases which…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Given that the PPA 2007 does not apply to special goods and services such as weapons acquisitions, details of offset arrangements are difficult to…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Given that the PPA 2007 does not apply to special goods and services such as weapons acquisitions, details of offset arrangements are difficult to…
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
Offset conditions are considered particularly sensitive and receive an additional layer of protection from scrutiny because of their politically sensitive nature (1). Further, off-set…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Offset conditions are considered particularly sensitive and receive an additional layer of protection from scrutiny because of their politically sensitive nature (1). Further, off-set…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The government does not generally make any details about off-set agreements public. They are considered particularly sensitive and as a result, are shielded from…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Enforcement is difficult to assess, as they are considered highly sensitive (1). Although investigations are taking place concerning the high-profile generals accused of fraud,…
Explore
Q72 25/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
Offset contracts are secretive and not openly discussed in the media. Off-set agreements may be discussed where there is some particular benefit such as…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no public policies on the use of agents. The government is often reluctant to acknowledge the use of such intermediaries. In discussions…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The FGN rarely acknowledges the official use of intermediaries. The high cost of the Tucano purchase was “most likely through intermediaries in which case…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Details of defence procurement transactions are not made public. In discussions with a source, details were described as “highly confidential” and unlikely to be…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI.
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government often justifies acquisitions based on military need. The asymmetrical nature of the…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. A recent example of this is the insurgency in the North East, which continues…
Explore