Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

29/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 38/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs’ (MoDVA) procurement legal framework is derived from…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 50 / 100
The PPDA Act (2003) allows the Defence and National Security Organs to manage their procurement and disposal on the basis of a dual list…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
According to the PPDA: “The Defence and National Security Organs shall agree annually with the Authority (PPDA) on the category of restricted items to…
Explore
Q58 33/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is partly formalised. The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets law guides the ministries of defence and security [1].…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The PPDA Act [1] mandates all ministries to be transparent. Some aspects of the defence procurement cycle are disclosed to the public such as…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
Policies and procedures for each step of the procurement process are detailed, but there is no evidence that they are applied for instance the…
Explore
Q59 50/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 75 / 100
There are formalised independent oversight bodies which oversee procurement activities in the ministry of Defence. The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The defence procurement oversight mechanisms fall under the mandates of the inspector general of government (IGG), The Office of the Auditor General, The Public…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
According to one MP, defence procurement is “above scrutiny,” therefore, one should not expect any transparency in their deals [1]. Another MP noted that…
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
Though the government developed the white paper on defence transformation in 2004, it is not an indicator of forward planning as a strategy for…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There are few notices of planned purchases, but most planned purchases are not made public because they are considered classified and therefore not closed…
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence purchases are not made public because most of the time these purchases fall under classified budget/expenditure [1]. According to Lieutenant Colonel Deo Akiiki,…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
With almost everything being classified, no such information is accessible to the public [1]. There are only three MPs [2] (the speaker, chairperson of…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 0/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 0 / 100
Section 70 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act (PPDA) [1] talks about the basic qualifications of bidders. It states that…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored Not Applicable., as It is not evident that suppliers and/ or sub-contractors are required to sign anti-corruption clauses in contracts…
Explore
Q63 25/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
There is a Defence Policy, however, there is no evidence to support whether procurement of defence items are aligned with the defence strategy [1].…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The Parliamentary Committee of Defense & Internal Affairs[1] is the over seer of the ministry of defence and veterans affairs. It scrutnises its plans,…
Explore
Purchases Score: 50 / 100
When the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs Procurement Audit Report F/Y 2016/17[1] revealed that the ministry’s approved procurements were not on the procurement…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No percentages are provided here becuase it is not possible to access such information from…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 50 / 100
The PPDA [1] carries out procurement and disposal audits to monitor the compliance levels of the ministry [1]. Even classified expenditure are audited, and…
Explore
Q65 25/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
These officials are normally appointed based on their education and areas of expertise. Section 91U (2) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
There is evidence that the PPDA tracks audits. However, there is inadequate evidence to show that the law is adhered to. Section 31 of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Since the defence and security procurement are above scrutiny[1], there is limited transparency including with regards to the codes of conduct and regulations which…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Given the secrecy in which defence and security matters are taken in the country [1,…
Explore
Q66 50/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
Section 95, (1a)[2] states that an Accounting Officer, a member of the Contracts Committee, a member of the evaluation committee, an employee of the…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Section 94 of the PPDA Act (2003) [1] provides for the suspension of providers. It states: “that the Authority may on the recommendation of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
There is limited evidence of cases being investigated or prosecuted regarding collusion in procurement. In 2020, the Public Procurement and Disposal Authority (PPDA) received…
Explore
Training Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Since the assessor could not meet the procurement disposal unit, despite several attempts, I can…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 50/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
There are policies in place on how to monitor, assess and report upon a supplier’s service and or delivery obligations. There are also sanctioning…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Contract modifications after the award are not made public. Also, the relevant oversight committees of Parliament rarely get access to the most relevant contracts…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
The Office of the Auditor General[1-2] , and PPDA[3] have been producing annual reports ( which are drawn from different contract specific reports). These…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Most of the contracts are closed to the Ministry of Defence and Veterans Affairs, especially…
Explore
Q68 75/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Section 89 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act (PPDA) [1], provides for an administrative review. Subsection (1) states: “that a…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
The legal provisions are effective but costly. However, having the mechanisms is not a guarantee that a loser will get justice. But there are…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Most of the tenders which have been cancelled resulted from the aggrieved companies’ complaints. Therefore…
Explore
Q69 58/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
There is clear legislation and implementing guidelines empowering procurement officials to exclude companies and senior company officials where there is a conviction or credible…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 25 / 100
Clearly investigations on some of these dubious suppliers take place and that is how some companies have been blacklisted, although no one was jailed.…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 50 / 100
Apart from service providers being suspended from participating in public procurement and disposal of public assets proceedings, there are no stringent sanctions imposed on…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NEI/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no legal framework or policy covering offset contracts in Uganda.
Explore
Due diligence Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence of offset contracts was identified for the period of research covering this index.…
Explore
Q71 NEI/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
Research has not identified any legistlation, policies and procdeures dealing with offset contracts in Uganda.
Explore
Transparency Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence of offset contracts was identified for the period of research covering this index.…
Explore
Monitoring Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence of offset contracts was identified for the period of research covering this index.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence of offset contracts was identified for the period of research covering this index.…
Explore
Q72 NEI/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. No evidence of offset contracts was identified for the period of research covering this index.…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no policy regulating the use of agents. In the past, there have been reported cases of intermediaries and agents involved in the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no policy to enforce. But the use of agents and intermediaries are a common occurence…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
According to two MPs, details of the financing package are unknown to the public because they are considered security matters and are, therefore, classified…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is political influence from the selling countries. So far, Russia has been the…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government does not disclose or justify why it purchases arms from particular countries.…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
There is pressure from political elites and other sources, who are deemed powerful, such as relatives of army officers, relatives and friends of the…
Explore