Political Risk:

High

Score:

39/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 50/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
The Parliament of Botswana is the supreme legislative authority. The National Assembly is a representative body elected by universal adult suffrage and consists of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
In the absence of a clear Defence Policy, the Parliament of Botswana does have the powers to debate the Defence Budget. Whilst the Defence…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
The current Executive of President, Mogkweetsi Masisi, came into power on 1st April 2018. There is no clear evidence as to any coercion either…
Explore
Q2 40/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
The Foreign Affairs, Defence, Justice & Security Committee has the legislative power to examine defence expenditure. Although this committee has other additional functions, which…
Explore
Expertise Score: 0 / 100
The Foreign Affairs, Defence, Justice & Security Committee is led by Hon. Kenny K. Kapinga, MP, [1] however it is not clear from publicly…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked as ‘Not Applicable’. The Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence, Justice and Security is not responsible for scrutinising the defence…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 75 / 100
There are monthly scheduled meetings for the Committee ( for the period that the Parliament is in session) to scrutinise the budgets and other…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
There are provisions allow the Committee to conduct long term investigations; however, there is no evidence of such long term investigations having been conducted…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
Recommendations to improve the operations of the Ministries are issued by the Committee to the relevant Ministries incorporated [1]. These recommendations range from human…
Explore
Q3 0/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 0 / 100
The country does not have a Defence Policy or a National Security Strategy that is debated and publicly available [1]. In 2019, a paper…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ because, as noted in 3A, Botswana does not have a Defence Policy or National Security Strategy [1]. For…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
It follows from 3A and 3B that there have not been any public consultations in the last 5 years. This is because the country…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ because, as noted in 3A, Botswana does not have a Defence Policy or National Security Strategy. As such,…
Explore
Q4 17/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any relationship between CSOs and defence and security institutions. This can be attributed to the historical development of Botswana…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
In general, CSOs operate independently and are protected in terms of the law [1]. The role of CSOs was recognised as far back as…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any collaboration between the CSOs and the Defence on areas of corruption. Further, there is no indication that such…
Explore
Q5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Botswana acceded to the UNCAC on 27 June 2011 [1]. The country is not a Member of OECD [2]. According to SIPRI Arms Transfer…
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
Botswana has substantially complied with the obligations of UNCAC [1]. For example, the establishment of an anti-corruption agency in the form of the Directorate…
Explore
Q6 25/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 50 / 100
Generally, there is debate around Defence issues but in most cases, it is around budget allocations, recruitment, and in some instances, the corruption that…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 0 / 100
There is no government debate with the public on Defence issues. As highlighted in 6A, Defence issues are talked about as a result of…
Explore
Q7 0/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 0 / 100
Botswana does not have a National Anti-Corruption Policy [1]. The government has admitted this by stating that President Mokgweetsi Masisi has called on governments…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as there is not an openely stated anti-corruption policy.
Explore
Q8 42/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 25 / 100
There is no specific unit within the Defence services sector that is independent and well-resourced. Effective institutions, within defence and security, are tasked with…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The institutions outlined in 8A are not within the Defence department. However, these are the institutions that are responsible for dealing with issues of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Generally, the institutions are run professionally and they always endeavour to improve their operations [1]. However, their work on Defence is not made public…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The history of allegations of corruption in the Defence Sector appears to have created…
Explore
Q10 13/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 25 / 100
There is awareness of risk areas within the Defence sector [1]. However, as it has been alluded to earlier, in the absence of a…
Explore
Regularity Score: 0 / 100
Risk assessments are not conducted on a scheduled basis [1]. There are no published risk assessments that have been done in recent years. However,…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
There are no corruption risk assessments that have been carried out or documented. As such, this indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’. Whatever available information…
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 67/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 75 / 100
There are clear planning and acquisition processes that are guided in terms of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act [1]. These are available…
Explore
Transparency Score: 75 / 100
The Public Procurement Manual defines the public procurement philosophy as to continually introduce higher standards and to achieve: a) Open, fair and transparent tendering…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
There is no evidence that the country has a clear process for acquisition planning within the BDF and Defence Sector that involves clear oversight…
Explore
Q12 50/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The Defence budget is available on an aggregate basis. Since the BDF does not have a standalone Ministry, the BDF budget is combined under…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 50 / 100
The legislature receives the budget at least 2 months before the budget proposals. The budget proposal is then debated in Parliament before the final…
Explore
Q13 25/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
There is the Foreign Affairs, Defence, Justice and Security Portfolio Committee which is appointed at the beginning of each Parliament for the Life of…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 0 / 100
The Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence, Justice, Security are appointed at the beginning of each Parliament stage during the life of the Parliament…
Explore
Q14 50/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 75 / 100
The approved budget is made public with some explanations, although, the explanations are not detailed enough for more detailed scrutiny [1]. However, the explanations…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
The approved budget is published as aggregated with reasonable information which may not be detailed enough in most cases [1]. The published budget is…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information on response to information requests to score this indicator. The formal mechanisms to request information are available to the…
Explore
Q15 NEI/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The only source of Defence funding that is known and published in the Central Government…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. As explained in 15A above, the only source of Defence funding that is known and…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. As explained in 15A above, the only source of Defence funding that is known and…
Explore
Q16 38/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 25 / 100
BDF has a fully functional Internal Audit that was established in 2008. The operational issues of the BDF Internal Audit Department and its publications…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 50 / 100
Auditor General is among the external institutons that exercise oversight in summary form only [1]. In addition, the Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence,…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Auditor General is among the external institutons that exercise oversight in summary form only [1]. In addition, the Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence,…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The Ministry of Defence, Justice and Security sometimes address issues raised by both the Internal Audit and the Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence,…
Explore
Q17 56/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 25 / 100
Although the Botswana Auditor General conducts an annual external audit of the Defence, there is little evidence of these audits. In addition, their other…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The Office of the Auditor General is the Supreme Audit Institution of this country, which has been established under Section 124 of the Constitution…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
The external audit reports are published annually [1]. The OAG offers a range of audit services, including financial audit or certification audits, which are…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
Sometimes the Ministry makes references to the audit findings. Such statements often acknowledge the audit findings showing a commitment by the Ministry to make…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 67/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There are no legal restrictions that prohibit the BDF from engaging in business involving the natural resources of Botswana [1,2]. There is no legal…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence to the effect that the BDF is involved in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation [1,2].
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence to the effect that the BDF officials are involved in businesses that relate to natural resources [1,2]. Officers are prohibited…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that such interests exists, as such this indicator is marked Not Applicable. No such declarations have been made [1] and…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that these interests are declared if at all they exist. As such, this indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’. The Declaration…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 75/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of organised crime in the BDF.
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
Botswana has put in place the following legal framework to deal with organised crime: the proceeds of the Serious Crimes Act passed to deprive…
Explore
Q20 75/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 100 / 100
The Botswana Police Force has a unit that deals with organised crime [1]. At one event, it was stated that “Botswana Police deputy commissioner,…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
These institutions are independent as far as the work of investigating organised crime is concerned [1]. Botswana recognises the need for increased cooperation between…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
At a domestic level, the policing and institutional structure is provided for in terms of the following legislation: the national legal framework against corruption…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 38/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
The following institutions provide independent oversight over the budget of the intelligence services. Relevant authorities in preventing and countering corruption include the Directorate on…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
The meetings of the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence, Justice and Security, specifically on DISS, are not scheduled or published. This makes…
Explore
Q22 8/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
Senior positions within the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Services (DISS) are the prerogative of the President. The objectivity of the process remains unknown…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 25 / 100
Although there is some evidence that the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Services (DISS) is composed of former police, military and intelligence officers [1],…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
For the Directorate of Intelligence and Security Services (DISS) there is little to no evidence of an external vetting process on promotion or even…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 NEI/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
On 7 June 2019, Botswana deposited (Accession) the Instrument to become a Party to the ATT. The ATT came into force on 5 September…
Explore
Compliance Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. The country has only recently deposited the ATT Instrument, therefore, it is too soon to…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ because Botswana does not manufacture or export arms aside from one isolated case in 2013 [1,2]. The circumstances…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Botswana does not have a legal framework to regulate lobbying activities [1,2]. Further, the country has not indicated whether it will enact a lobbying…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
Botswana does not have a legal framework to regulate lobbying in general, let alone, lobbying of defence institutions [1,2]. As such, this indicator is…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
Botswana does not have a legal framework to regulate lobbying in general, let alone, lobbying of defence institutions [1,2]. As such, this indicator is…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
Botswana does not have a legal framework to regulate lobbying in general, let alone, lobbying of defence institutions [1,2]. As such, this indicator is…
Explore