Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

10/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Chile Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 0/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 0 / 100
Although there is no unified doctrine that specifically addresses corruption in the operations of the armed forces, there are codes of conduct that, although…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Some aspects relevant to codes of conduct for honesty, integrity, probity, and transparency in military life are described in the book, the Army’s Ethos…
Explore
Q52 25/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
Troops participating in peacekeeping operations in foreign countries must comply with special training at the Centre of Training for Peacekeeping Operations of Chile (Cecopac).…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
Forward planning often takes into account strategic, technical and operational issues, but there is no evidence that corruption concerns are part of the decision-making…
Explore
Application Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that corruption concerns or specific training in handling corruption problems are applied in the field. There could be an emerging…
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that trained professionals are regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field, nor reports on the status of corruption…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no information available of specific guidance for monitoring corruption risks during operations or peacekeeping missions. Other than the United Nations’ principles and…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Chile does not deploy trained professionals to monitor corruption risk in the field, as outlined in 57A. As such, this indicator is marked ‘Not…
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 25/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of guidance specifically regarding contracting risks during operations or peacekeeping missions.
Explore
Training Score: 50 / 100
There is no evidence of training provided on corruption risks in contracting operations or any general corruption risks, whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence of the use of private military contractors (PMCs) or their…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are some regulations for the private security sector but not for the PMCs.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Given the limited regulation and the low salience of the issue, there is very…
Explore