Political Risk:

Very High

Score:

27/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 25/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 25 / 100
According to the 2016 Constitution, the Assemblée Nationale (NA, Parliament) has some formal mechanisms allowing for oversight of government policy. However, the NA lacks…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPA), the preparation of the national budget does not require consultations with the NA. However, the NA monitors the…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The NA Commission Sécurité et Défense (CSD) has a composition that reflects the numerical strength of the party currently in power (Rassemblement des Républicains,…
Explore
Q2 13/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Oversight of national defence policy is exercised via the permanent NA Commission on Security and Defence (Commission Sécurité et Défense, CSD). [The name of…
Explore
Expertise Score: 25 / 100
The CSD is composed of 20 members of the NA who are tasked with oversight of national security, police forces, immigration, local police and…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 0 / 100
Since Sidiki Konate became president of the CSD in May 2017, the commission has failed to review major defence policy decisions. Most of the…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that the CSD exercises short-term oversight over defence policy. Most of the activity reported on the CSD by the NA…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The CSD does not conduct or commission long-term investigations. The CSD mandate does not make any reference to long-term oversight. The official blog of…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that the MoD of Côte d’Ivoire implemented any policy recommendations issued by the CSD. As with sub-indicators 2D and 2E…
Explore
Q3 8/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 0 / 100
Members of the executive may relay issues of national security to other branches of government and the public about recurrent military uprisings or counter-terrorism…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: NA / 100
Because there is no public debate on defence policy, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable. The NA has been neutralized by years of…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that formal public consultations on defence take place or that such consultations lead to findings that are later incorporated by…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The public access to policy documents and information on defence or security strategy does not take place in practice. Hence, there is no evidence…
Explore
Q4 33/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is limited evidence of formal or informal requirements at institutions such as the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the NA Commission on Security and…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 75 / 100
Thre is no evidence that the current government uses restrictive laws to silence CSOs or uses paperwork or tax hurdles to restrict the activity…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 25 / 100
Some evidence that defence and security institutions are taking initial steps to engage with CSOs. But the CSO activity in this area is minimal…
Explore
Q5 63/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Côte d’Ivoire signed the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC; CNUCC) on December 10, 2003, ratifying and publishing it on December 6, 2011. The…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
Côte d’Ivoire is still working on implementing all the UNCAC provisions. The compliance issues that remain outstanding are regularly discussed during government compliance (mise-en-oeuvre)…
Explore
Q6 50/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 50 / 100
Evidence of debates about security and defence issues take place occasionally in the public sphere. But given the climate of political polarization following the…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
The engagement by defence establishments such as the MoD can be characterized as inconsistent and exclusive of highly polarizing issues. The intention is not…
Explore
Q7 50/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
There is a general anti-corruption policy, but also a lack of an explicit anti-corruption framework for the defence sector. The existing anti-corruption mechanisms apply…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 0 / 100
TThe anti-corruption policies and their associated measures have not been effectively implemented. The reasons include institutional weakness, but also the fact that despite a…
Explore
Q8 33/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 50 / 100
Most of the mandates of the units that target anti-corruption in Côte d’Ivoire extend only nominally to the defence sector. Additionally, the resources allocated…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The Brigade de Lutte Contre la Corruption (BLC) was established in 2012 within the Inspection Générale des Finances (IGF). In theory, it was set…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
In terms of effectiveness, the direct dependence on government funds and poor resource allocation means that the anti-corruption units and entities in Côte d’Ivoire…
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The defence establishment does not sanction bribery and corruption. The findings indicate that the…
Explore
Q10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
There is a lack of evidence in the last 2-3 years that the government or the NA has subjected the areas most at risk…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence of regular assessments of at-risk corruption areas in the defence sector. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence of regular assessments of at-risk corruption areas in the defence sector. Therefore, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 33/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 25 / 100
The government has instituted an annual acquisition plan for the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of the Interior, which is derived from a…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The main guidelines of the newly introduced Loi de Programmation Militaire (LPM), the military expenditure roadmap, have been widely reported by Ivorian media. But…
Explore
External oversight Score: 50 / 100
In theory, external oversight of the LPM involves the Lower House via its Commission de Sécurité et de Défense (CSD). As Curtis writes: “Clearly,…
Explore
Q12 25/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
The annual draft Budget Law shows highly aggregated figures for projected expenditure in the defence and security sector. For example, the draft Budget Law…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 0 / 100
According to Article 112 of the 2016 Constitution, the Assemblée Nationale (NA) should receive the draft Budget Law (Loi de Finances) before the end…
Explore
Q13 50/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
On January 4, 2016, the attending members of the CSD voted unanimously in favour of adopting the current LPM for the period 2016-2020. The…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 50 / 100
The Commission de Sécurité et de Défense (CSD) reviewed the LPM 2016-2020, voting unanimously in favour of its adoption on January 4, 2016. Though…
Explore
Q14 8/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 25 / 100
Although scarcely distributed, the budget is available via the Journal Officiel publications. according to an interview with an MP, it is a fact that…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Although scarcely distributed, the budget is available via the Journal Officiel publications, but the information available online does not provide sufficient details as to…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 0 / 100
Details of budgetary allocations in the LPM 2016-2020 are difficult or outright impossible to obtain. However, aggregate data is made available, which results in…
Explore
Q15 17/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that the MoD has alternate (formal) sources of income other than the resources allocated by the central government via the…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of alternate (formal) sources of income for the MoD other than the central government allocations. Hence, there is no oversight…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
There has been public scrutiny (media, academics, CSOs) over the control that certain former rebel leaders of the Forces Nouvelles (FN), known as COMZONES,…
Explore
Q16 6/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 25 / 100
The Comptroller General at MoD (Contrôle Général de l’Administration et des Finances de la Défense, CGAFD) monitors the proper functioning of departments and agencies…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
As per Decree No. 2016-257 (Portant Organisation du Ministère de la Défense) of May 3, 2016, there is no evidence that the IGA, CGAFD…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
IGA, CGAFD and Direction des Finances internal audits are not subject to external audit bodies, including anti-corruption organizations. The mandates of these internal audit…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence in open sources of the existence of IGA, CGAFD or Direction des Finances audit reports being forwarded to the minister…
Explore
Q17 13/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 0 / 100
IIn theory, the NA Commission de Sécurité et de Défense (CSD) is tasked with oversight of MoD expenditure via amendment procedures to the annual…
Explore
Independence Score: 25 / 100
In theory, the NA Commission de Sécurité et de Défense (CSD) is tasked with oversight of MoD expenditure via amendment procedures to the annual…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
According to the 2016 Constitution, the Cour des Comptes (Court of Auditors) has the authority to audit public finances including MoD expenditure (1). The…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 25 / 100
President Ouattara asked his cabinet ministers to address issues that are raised by the reports submitted to him by the Court des Comptes, but…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 30/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of any legal prohibition against defence institutions (MoD structures) or individuals having financial interests in natural resources or extractive industries.
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
Illicit trafficking in natural resources and commodities (minerals, coffee/cocoa, timber, cotton, cashews and petroleum) is being carried out by former rebel leaders of the…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 50 / 100
It is important to point out that defence institutions (MoD) are not directly involved in this kind of illicit activity. The government is attempting…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The interests of the COMZONES in the illicit trafficking of commodities and natural resources are not publicly declared and are entirely non-transparent. The government…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The interests of former rebel leaders (COMZONES) in commodities and natural resources are not subject to any kind of public scrutiny due to political…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 50/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 50 / 100
Even though there is no evidence through media investigations or judicial reports that organized crime has penetrated the defence sector, the problem with illicit…
Explore
Government response Score: 50 / 100
The government is aware of the illicit trafficking rings of former rebel leaders, now reintegrated into the armed forces, pose a threat to political…
Explore
Q20 50/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 50 / 100
In theory, several quasi-policing mechanisms could carry out investigations into grand corruption and organized crime in the defence services. However, there is no single…
Explore
Independence Score: 50 / 100
Most of the policing mechanisms are nominally independent and are vulnerable to political interference by the executive as well as by high-ranking members of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The policing mechanisms tasked with investigating corruption and organized crime can be described as largely ineffective because they lack independence, are understaffed and lack…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
The former Agence Nationale de la Stratégie et de l’Intelligence (ANSI), set up by Laurent Gbagbo in 2005, was permanently dissolved via Decree No.…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
The NA or any independent body does not oversee the function of the Coordination Nationale du Renseignement (CNR). Therefore, this indicator has been marked…
Explore
Q22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
Given the centralization of the Coordination Nationale du Renseignement (CNR) within the executive since 2014, it is not possible to discern whether the intelligence…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
Given the centralization of the CNR within the executive, the president himself, the minister of presidential affairs or the chief of staff most likely…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
Given the extreme centralization of the CNR within the Executive, the vetting process of individual candidates is restricted to a small circle of people…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 63/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Côte d’Ivoire signed the ATT on June 3, 2013. It ratified it on February 25, 2015. The date of effect of ATT ratification is…
Explore
Compliance Score: 25 / 100
Compliance and implementation of the ATT in Côte d’Ivoire are being tracked by the NA Commission on small arms (Commission Nationale des Armes Légères…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Côte d’Ivoire is not an arms exporter. Therefore, the NA does not hold debates about upcoming arms exports, and this indicator has been marked…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The legislative framework of Côte d’Ivoire does not contain explicit provisions regulating lobbying activity concerning public procurement contracts that apply directly to the defence…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
The legislative framework of Côte d’Ivoire does not contain explicit provisions regulating lobbying activity concerning public procurement contracts that apply directly to the defence…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
The legislative framework of Côte d’Ivoire does not contain explicit provisions regulating lobbying activity concerning public procurement contracts that apply directly to the defence…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
The legislative framework of Côte d’Ivoire does not contain explicit provisions regulating lobbying activity concerning public procurement contracts that apply directly to the defence…
Explore