Political Risk:

High

Score:

45/100

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Collapse
Q1 67/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
Parliament has the power to scrutinise defence policy and legislation. It cannot veto defence policy under any circumstances. However, it can review the defence…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Parliament debates and reviews defence policy but only occasionally. There are two parliamentary committees: the Permanent National Defence and Foreign Affairs Committee (PNDFAC) and…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Neither the Executive nor the Military coerce or unduly influence Parliament over any matter. Since 1974, Greece has been a functioning liberal democracy where…
Explore
Q2 25/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
There is a permanent National Defence and Foreign Affairs Committee which consists of 54 members drawn from all parliamentary parties. The committee has formal…
Explore
Expertise Score: 50 / 100
Only some of the committee members have relevant expertise as indicated by their resumes. However, it is customary that former MPs who served as…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 0 / 100
The committee does not regularly review major defence policies. In effect, the committee plays a minor role in the foreign and defence policy decision-making…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 25 / 100
The committee does not exercise any short-term oversight over defence policy or annual strategy but functions more as a forum for debating national defence…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The committee does not conduct long-term investigations into defence and security issues. The only notable exception to this is the investigation into the Turkish…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: NA / 100
This indicator has been scored Not Applicable, as the committee does not usually provide recommendations [1, 2]. Moreover, there is a lack of such…
Explore
Q3 50/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 50 / 100
There is a growing interest in defence and security issues due to the challenging security environment [1]. Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, and Citizen…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: 75 / 100
The discussion of defence policy has focused on external threats (e.g. Turkish claims to the Aegean Sea) and the level of defence spending at…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 50 / 100
There is a limited consultation process involving the Greek public through the website OpenGov.gr. There is occasionally public consultation on draft legislative proposals covering…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Only a few documents on defence and security are available to the public. The last version of The White Paper on Defence was published…
Explore
Q4 25/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
[1] There are neither formal nor informal policies requiring openness towards civil society organisations. Despite Greece’s high defence expenditure, there are no national CSOs…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 75 / 100
Greek CSOs enjoy a range of protections from government interference. They are thus able to operate without fear of potential reprisals [1]. Nevertheless, they…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no engagement between Greek CSOs and the defence sector for two reasons. Firstly, Greece’s high defence expenditure is widely perceived as a…
Explore
Q5 88/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Greece is not currently a significant defence exporter. There is a small defence industry consisting of problematic state-owned companies and small private firms. The…
Explore
Compliance Score: 75 / 100
In March 2016, Greece successfully underwent a preliminary compliance check by the OECD. Greek companies operating abroad were praised for their cooperation in anti-corruption…
Explore
Q6 75/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 100 / 100
There is a rich public debate over defence issues due to perceived threats and Greece’s high defence spending [1, 2]. There are several magazines…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 50 / 100
From time to time, perhaps every five to six months depending on the situation, the Government informs the public about defence issues through press…
Explore
Q7 75/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
Greece adopted a National Anti-corruption Action Plan (2018-2021), which applies to the defence sector [1].
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 50 / 100
There is an anti-corruption action plan covering, among other sectors, the defence sector [1]. However, there is no evidence the government has taken action…
Explore
Q8 0/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 0 / 100
There are no compliance or ethics units in the strict sense within defence and security currently. An Integrity Advisor’s Office will be established in…
Explore
Independence Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as there are no independent institutions within the MOD or other ministries focusing on eradicating corruption.
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ Greece does not currently have such an institution.
Explore
Q9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Greek public tends to be sceptical of the MoD’s policy and procedures for…
Explore
Q10 0/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 0 / 100
No defence-specific assessment of corruption risk has been commissioned in recent years [1, 2]. It may be improved in the near future, as The…
Explore
Regularity Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as the MoD and other relevant ministries do not conduct regular assessments of corruption risks [1, 2].
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as the MoD and other relevant ministries do not conduct regular assessments of corruption risks [1, 2].
Explore

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 25/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 50 / 100
There are very few explicit connections made between specific purchases and defence strategy requirements [1]. However, there is a process in place stipulated by…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The Greek public has limited access to information regarding acquisition planning because this is treated as a national security issue [1, 2]. The MoD…
Explore
External oversight Score: 0 / 100
There is no external oversight of the acquisition planning process [1, 2].
Explore
Q12 63/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The defence budget contains comprehensive information on expenditure across functions (e.g. salaries and allowances, construction and procurement/acquisitions), in line with the appropriate codification according…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 50 / 100
According to the law 4270/2014, the Minister of Finance submits to the Hellenic Parliament the draft State Budget (and therefore the Defence Budget) at…
Explore
Q13 25/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 50 / 100
There is a Special Standing Parliamentary Committee on Armaments Programmes and Contracts with formal rights of scrutiny of the defence budget, but it lacks…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: 0 / 100
The Special Standing Parliamentary Committee on Armaments Programmes and Contracts can review the implementation of armaments programmes and defence equipment contracts [1]. However the…
Explore
Q14 58/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
The approved state budget (including defence part) is published and made available to the public in partly disaggregated form in line with Governmental Classification…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
Once the state budget (including defence part) is approved it becomes available to public on designated public data website. Consequently, also MoD decision on…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 25 / 100
There is a serious and systematic failure to release information. This may be in specific areas or accessibility to requested information may vary according to the identity of…
Explore
Q15 50/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The publication of income sources is selective and no information is released on amounts received or on the allocation of this income [1, 2].…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 75 / 100
Mechanisms of scrutiny are in place and administered by central government departments such as the Supreme Audit Institution [1]. However, the Internal Audit Office…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
There is some scrutiny by the public, including by the media and CSOs, but it may not be in-depth or consistent [1]. In March…
Explore
Q16 63/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The Independent Office of Preventive Audit, subordinated directly to the Director General on Defence Equipment and Investments, is responsible for conducting the precautionary audit,…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 75 / 100
Oversight occurs for sensitive or critical issues. Enabling oversight bodies (e.g. the Committee on Armaments Programs and Contracts) are provided with reports that may…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
Internal audit reports are sometimes released to legitimate external audit bodies and the internal audit process is subject to sporadic or superficial reviews by…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The ministry sometimes addresses audit findings in its practices, but not regularly [1, 2]. There are no publicly available sources which illustrate this.
Explore
Q17 69/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
The Hellenic Single Public Procurement Authority (HSPPA) is independent of the Ministry of Defence but reports to the Executive and the Parliament. However, the…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The HSPPA has its own budget (i.e. passed by Parliament) and there are legal protections in place for this budget not to be altered…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Court of Audit has published its reports online (e.g. reports on audited accounts, oral briefings, expert advice, investigative work), but with some redactions…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 50 / 100
The ministry sometimes addresses audit findings in its practices, but not regularly [1, 2]. There are no publicly available sources which illustrate these institutional…
Explore

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 83/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
In accordance with Law 4433/1964 all related natural resources exploitation is conducted under the authority of Ministry of Environment and Energy [1]. MoD has…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of defence institutions being involved in businesses relating to Greece’s natural resource exploitation [1, 2].
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of individual defence personnel being involved in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation [1, 2].
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence of defence personnel being involved in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence of defence institutions’ interests in controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with…
Explore

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 NEI/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of organised crime in the defence sector [1]. Greek or foreign criminal groups have not been able to penetrate the…
Explore
Government response Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. Despite Greece having no history of organised crime involvement in the defence and security sector…
Explore
Q20 50/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 50 / 100
The Organised Crime Service and the Counter-Terrorism Service of the Greek Police have in the past been involved in cases involving the Armed Forces,…
Explore
Independence Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough information to score this indicator. There is no independent unit within the MoD and the armed services investigating corruption or…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
Though the Organised Crime Service and the Counter-Terrorism Service occasionally investigate cases in the defence sector, this is not regular [1]. There is no…
Explore

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 13/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
Little is publicly known regarding the policies, administration and budgets of the three main intelligences services, including the National Intelligence Service (EYP), the Military…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is no independent oversight of the intelligence services’ administration and budgets, aside from the superficial and irregular scrutiny of the Committee on Institutions…
Explore
Q22 17/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 25 / 100
The criteria for selection of senior positions within the intelligence services are unclear. In August 2019, the new Government changed the law regarding the…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 25 / 100
Senior positions in the intelligence services are primarily appointed by the Executive as a reward [1]. For example, one of the current deputy directors…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
There is little or no investigation of individuals’ suitability or prior conduct. The most recent appointments to the National Intelligence Agency are a striking…
Explore

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 75/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Greece signed the ATT in June 2013 and ratified the treaty in May 2016 [1, 2].
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
The country has complied with each of the three ATT articles [1, 2, 3].
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Upcoming arms exports are subject to parliamentary debate but Parliament has limited ability to influence decision-making [1, 2]. In 2017, for example, Parliament discussed…
Explore

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Greece has no framework for regulating lobbying activity, since very few firms engage in such activity [1, 2]. Research could find no relevant legislation…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying in the field of defence/security in Greece. Defence officials are not…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as Greece has no legislation regulating lobbying and no lobbyist registration system. There is no registration system for…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked Not Applicable as there is no legislation regulating lobbying of defence institutions in Greece. There is no registration system for…
Explore