Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

23/100

Collapse
57 50/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Nigeria has a Public Procurement Act (Public Procurement Act, 2007) that serves as a…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 100 / 100
The legislation in Nigeria recognises the risk of corruption [1]. Article 58(4)b recognises ‘conducting or attempting to conduct procurement fraud by means of fraudulent…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The exemptions provided in public procurement acts with reference to national deference or national security creates room for opaqueness in defence procurement process in…
Explore
58 25/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 0 / 100
Nigeria has established regulations intended to promote transparency in defence procurement. However, full public disclosure of all details related to the procurement cycle is…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement Act (2007) and the Freedom of Information Act (2011) provide exemptions with reference to National Defence. For instance, according to Section…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
The policies on public procurement are defined in the relevant laws and regulations governing procurement in Nigeria. There are formal policies and procedures in…
Explore
59 42/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 50 / 100
Defence procurement oversight mechanisms in Nigeria include relevant committees of the National Assembly [1]; Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP); Auditor General’s Office; as well…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
There is some evidence that legislative control of the security sector in Nigeria has progressively improved. The standing committees of the NASS have become…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The transparency of defence procurement oversight is severely constrained. Many aspects of the oversight process, such as the findings of the National Assembly committees…
Explore
60 13/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
Potential defence purchases in Nigeria are not typically made public. However, in some instances, government is pressured to make public some potential defence procurements…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
The Nigerian government does not publish detailed plans for defence purchases in advance. The planning and budgeting process for defence procurement is generally classified,…
Explore
61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
Occasionally, some defence purchases in Nigeria are not made public. The details of what has been purchased, from whom, and for how much are…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Although the budget allocation of the MOD is usually accessible in the consolidate annual budget of Nigeria, specifics of defence spending is rarely in…
Explore
62 25/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
There are quite a few laws in Nigeria guiding procurement, even that of defence, though their application has usually been inconsistent at best in…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 25 / 100
In the Nigerian case, the level of compliance to the procedures and standards prescribed by relevant laws and institutional frameworks is very weak, plagued…
Explore
63 17/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 25 / 100
Nigeria does have a national defence policy and various strategic documents that outline the country’s defence priorities and objectives, such as the National Defence…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
In theory, institutions responsible for oversight, such as the National Assembly, Auditor General’s Office; as well as Anticorruption agencies such as ICPC and EFCC…
Explore
Purchases Score: 25 / 100
Nigeria’s defence purchases to some extents are reflective of the contemplations in its national defence strategy, although some acquisitions are opportunistic in nature. As…
Explore
64 13/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
While there is no publicly available comprehensive data detailing the exact percentage of defence procurements conducted through open competition in Nigeria, it is generally…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 25 / 100
The prevalence of a culture of secrecy about defence and security budgets and procurements in Nigeria despite the legislature’s formal authority to oversee it…
Explore
65 31/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
The MOD’s Tenders Board is under the Procurement Department. Although officials with a role in designing tender specification, or in tender board decisions, are…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
While regulatory frameworks do exist, including the Public Procurement Act (2007), its application within the defence sector is inconsistent. The Ministry of Defence (MOD)…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Tender boards in Nigeria’s defence sector are formally guided by the Public Procurement Act (2007), which mandates the establishment of Ministerial Tenders Boards (MTBs)…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The NASS has the authority to supervise defence procurement and spending, especially through the Public Accounts Committees [1]. However, due to political constraints, the…
Explore
66 31/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Bureau of Public Procurement conducts public reviews and auditing to verify due process and fair and open competition. Part XI of the PPA provides…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 25 / 100
The laws and regulations governing public procurement in Nigeria such as the PPA empowers relevant authorities to exclude companies or individuals implicated in bribery…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
While the legal framework allows for the exclusion of corrupt entities, enforcement can be inconsistent due to factors like political interference, corruption within the…
Explore
Training Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement Act 2007 empowers the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) to harmonizse existing government policies and practices in setting standards and developing…
Explore
67 19/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
Contractors are required to comply with the guidelines set out by the BPP, which include provisions for contract performance and reporting as dictated by…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Information on contract failures and modifications post award is rarely released. Such information only becomes public when anti-corruption agencies or other institutions of the…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Given the huge inflow of public funds to the defence sector, it is only reasonable that the processes through which these funds are expended…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Nigeria has mechanisms and procedures in place to ensure that defence contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery [1]. However, the effectiveness of…
Explore
68 50/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement Act (2007) grants companies the right to request an administrative review if they believe there has been a violation of procurement…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 0 / 100
Given that the complaints mechanism under the PPA 2007 does not apply to the defence sector it would appear that there is no clear…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
Despite the legal frameworks in place, companies may still fear retaliation or being discriminated against in future contracts, especially in the defence sector where…
Explore
69 58/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Part IV, section 8 of the Public Procurement Act outlines that a bidder may have its bid or tender excluded from any particular procurement…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 50 / 100
The PPA 2007, contains numerous procurement-related offences that stipulates sanctions such as imprisonment upon conviction, debarment from public procurement and fines [1]. In March…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 25 / 100
On paper, conviction of offences should result in a variety of sanctions, including criminal prosecution, financial penalties, debarment, contract termination, and reputational damage. Despite…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Given that the PPA 2007 does not apply to special goods and services such as weapons acquisitions, details of offset arrangements are difficult to…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Nigeria’s defence budget has steadily increased since Buhari’s first term in 2015 as has the total national budget. This has enabled expansive defence acquisitions…
Explore
71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement Act (2007) does not explicitly regulate offset contracts, especially in the defence sector. Instead, such arrangements are often treated as national…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
General information about major defence procurements—and their stated purpose—is occasionally disclosed through media statements or government press releases (for example, regarding UAV purchases or…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Even though the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) oversees general contract compliance, there is no evidence that offset agreements in defence are subjected to…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that offset contracts in Nigeria’s defence sector are systematically enforced or sanctioned for non-compliance. While the Office of the Auditor…
Explore
72 25/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
Offset contracts are excessively secretive arrangement in the defence procurement realm. As such, it is hardly made public. However, government officials can mention ongoing…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
Nigeria has historically relied on intermediaries in defence procurement, with several high-profile cases highlighting the associated risks of corruption and mismanagement. One such case…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that sanctions have been applied for violations of the directive banning intermediaries in defence procurement [2]. For example, when the…
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Details of defence procurement transactions in Nigeria is often cloaked in secrecy and rarely made public [1]. Even when such procurement transactions are reported…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Western sanctions on Russia and Belarus, Chinese arms suppliers are actively working to displace…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Nigeria in recent times has witnessed an unprecedented level of insecurity such as terrorism,…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
Amidst escalating insecurity, President Bola Tinubu has repeatedly pledged to use his constitutional powers to continue to equip, arm and empower the Nigerian military.…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question