Personnel Risk:

Moderate

Score:

62/100

Leadership Behaviour

Collapse
Q34 58/100

Do the Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, Chiefs of Defence, and Single Service Chiefs publicly commit, through, for example, speeches, media interviews, or political mandates, to anti-corruption and integrity measures?

View Question
Chiefs/Ministers: Internal communications Score: 50 / 100
There are internal communications made available to the public wherein top-level Defence Ministry officials commit to maintaining integrity and anti-corruption measures, albeit peripherally. The…
Explore
Chiefs/Ministers: Public commitment Score: 75 / 100
High-level commanders and ministers do publicly commend instances where corruption and fraud are uncovered and successfully investigated but do not generally mention specific measures…
Explore
Unit commanders and leaders Score: 50 / 100
The SANDF and Department of Defence regularly issue press releases and statements committing to anti-corruption or integrity measures, These are not, however, particularly detailed…
Explore
Q35 100/100

Are there effective measures in place for personnel found to have taken part in forms of bribery and corruption, and is there evidence that these measures are being carried out?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act of 2004 [1] is the civilian stepping point for legal measures relating to corruption prevention and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 100 / 100
As mentioned in Q.34B, the Directorate Anti-Corruption and Anti-Fraud serve as a major enforcement body of the Department of Defence. There have been several…
Explore
Q36 42/100

Is whistleblowing encouraged by the government, and are whistle-blowers in military and defence ministries afforded adequate protection from reprisal for reporting evidence of corruption, in both law and practice?

View Question
Legal provisions Score: 25 / 100
Legislation on whistleblowing and reporting corruption exists and applies to military and official personnel. Whistleblowers are protected by the following pieces of legislation: The…
Explore
Prioritisation Score: 50 / 100
The Department of Defence (DoD) reported that the “DOD Whistleblowing Hotline continued to be provided and maintained during the FY2017/18 as part of the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
According to Interviewee 5, a senior officer in the South African National Defence Force, there is widespread distrust of the whistleblowing mechanisms to protect…
Explore
Q37 0/100

Is special attention paid to the selection, time in post, and oversight of personnel in sensitive positions, including officials and personnel in defence procurement, contracting, financial management, and commercial management?

View Question
Coverage of sensitive (higher-risk) positions Score: 0 / 100
Neither the Department of Defence nor the South African Defence Force (SANDF) have publicised any information detailing the attention paid to appointments for sensitive…
Explore
Selection process Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence pointing to the recognition that certain positions may be more open to corruption…
Explore
Oversight Score: NA / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’ as there is no evidence pointing to the recognition that certain positions may be more open to corruption…
Explore

Payroll, Promotions, Appointments, Rewards

Expand
Q38 83/100

Is the number of civilian and military personnel accurately known and publicly available?

View Question
Accuracy Score: 50 / 100
The full force number, including civilians, is made available annually via the Department of Defence’s (DoD) Annual Report. This number is accurate and updated…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
This information is made available by both the DoD in its Annual Report and in the Defence Force Service Commission (DFSC) Ranks and Salaries…
Explore
Ghost soldiers Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence in the past five years of ghost soldiers existing within the South African National Defence Force [1].
Explore
Q39 63/100

Are pay rates and allowances for civilian and military personnel openly published?

View Question
Pay rates Score: 75 / 100
The Defence Force Service Commission (DFSC) and the Department of Defence (DoD) Annual Report both disclose pay rates for personnel (uniformed and civilian) [1,…
Explore
Allowances Score: 50 / 100
There is some limited information available between the DFSC and DoD Annual Report that disclose daily allowances, but it is not a complete guide.…
Explore
Q40 83/100

Do personnel receive the correct pay on time, and is the system of payment well-established, routine, and published?

View Question
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
There have been sporadic reports of pay disputes or lack of access to paid-positions, but this has been largely restricted to the Reserve Forces…
Explore
Accuracy Score: 100 / 100
There have not been any recent cases of widespread inaccuracies in the payment of salary amounts in the South Africa National Defence Force (SANDF)…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Pay scales are made available through the Department of Defence Annual Report and the Defence Force Service Commission [1, 2]. There has been a…
Explore
Q41 25/100

Is there an established, independent, transparent, and objective appointment system for the selection of military personnel at middle and top management level?

View Question
Formal process Score: 25 / 100
Interviewee 2 explained that there is an established and, on paper at least, an independent process at each level of selection. Service level appointments…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
It appears that parliamentary committee members are briefed on senior appointments, but Parliament does not have any power to block senior military appointments. For…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Appointment processes are sporadically explained or published via the DoD’s Corporate Communications Department, disseminated via press release (upon appointment completion) to the media, and…
Explore
Q42 56/100

Are personnel promoted through an objective, meritocratic process? Such a process would include promotion boards outside of the command chain, strong formal appraisal processes, and independent oversight.

View Question
Formal process Score: 25 / 100
According to interviewee 2, the promotions are done through what is termed the “meat market”. In essence, this means that officers are promoted internally…
Explore
Exceptions Score: 50 / 100
Exceptions do exist, such as in the Reserve Forces, whereby a “pool of specialists” programme exists that can ‘commission’ civilians to act as researchers…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
Promotions are published at least annually for senior officers. The information contains the officer’s force number, the arm of service, existing rank, new rank…
Explore
Frequency Score: 75 / 100
Promotions are published at least annually, but they are not published in advance of their effective date (or at least, not consistently) [1, 2].
Explore

Conscription and Recruitment

Expand
Q43 NA/100

Where compulsory conscription occurs, is there a policy of not accepting bribes for avoiding conscription? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: NA / 100
There is no policy of conscription, as such this indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’. As mentioned in the 2015 Index, conscription may be enforced…
Explore
Sanctions Score: NA / 100
There is no policy of conscription in South Africa, as such this indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’.
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is no policy of conscription, as such this indicator is scored ‘Not Applicable’.
Explore
Q44 92/100

is there a policy of refusing bribes to gain preferred postings? Are there appropriate procedures in place to deal with such bribery, and are they applied?

View Question
Policy Score: 100 / 100
The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) Code of Conduct does provide rules and policy on misconduct and corruption, which would pertain to bribery.…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Sanctions exist in accordance with the Military Legal Services and range from imprisonment in civilian prisons to confinement on base, to demotion, docked pay,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Military justice proceedings are carried out from charges to sentencing when effectively pursued through the Military Legal Services (MLS). However, financial constraints on the…
Explore

Salary Chain

Expand
Q45 100/100

Are chains of command separate from chains of payment?

View Question
Score: 100 / 100
Pay is separated from command structures and determined by a combination of rank, role, and time in a position [1]. This process is administered…
Explore

Values and Standards

Expand
Q46 83/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all military personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 50 / 100
The Defence Act No. 42 of 2002 refers to the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) ‘Code of Conduct’ as legally enforced through the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
While the code of conduct is publically available [1,2] – the actual level of guidance provided to SANDF recruits is unclear, but all recruits…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
Breaches of the code of conduct appear to be internally dealt with in a non-transparent manner, making any assessment of investigations or prosecution efficacy…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
Guidance on the code of conduct is included, but it is unclear how thorough and comprehensive this is for SANDF members during induction training…
Explore
Q47 75/100

Is there a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel that includes, but is not limited to, guidance with respect to bribery, gifts and hospitality, conflicts of interest, and post-separation activities? Is there evidence that breaches of the Code of Conduct are effectively addressed?

View Question
Code of conduct Score: 75 / 100
There is a Code of Conduct for all civilian personnel in the Department of Defence: “The DFSC Code of Conduct stipulates, with respect to…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The Defence Force Service Commission (DFSC) Code of Conduct is published in the DFSC annual report. It is not known to what extent specific…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
This indicator is scored ‘Not Enough Information’, because it is unclear to what extent the code(s) of conduct are enforced. Breaches of the code…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
The DFSC Code of Conduct is included in induction training for all personnel, civilian and defence alike.
Explore
Q48 67/100

Does regular anti-corruption training take place for military and civilian personnel?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 50 / 100
This is unclear as the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) does not make public the contents of its anti-corruption and fraud training courses…
Explore
Regularity Score: 75 / 100
Anti-corruption and fraud awareness training is part of the induction process of both new uniformed and civilian personnel into the SANDF, and in 2003…
Explore
Coverage of personnel Score: 75 / 100
While comprehensive anti-corruption and fraud awareness training is prioritised for commanders and senior civilian personnel [1] along with those in high-risk areas [2], the…
Explore
Q49 25/100

Is there a policy to make public outcomes of the prosecution of defence services personnel for corrupt activities, and is there evidence of effective prosecutions in recent years?

View Question
Policy Score: 0 / 100
There does not appear to be a policy related to the publication of defence service personnel prosecution outcomes.
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
There does not appear to be a policy related to the publication of defence service personnel prosecution outcomes. There is information available in the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
Unknown due to lack of transparency. The DoD 2017/18 Annual Report records prosecutions, as a performance indicator cryptically labelled: “The degree to which military…
Explore
Q50 33/100

Are there effective measures in place to discourage facilitation payments (which are illegal in almost all countries)?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
An analysis of South African anti-corruption legislation and effectiveness carried out by Dave Loxton of Werksman Attorneys concluded that the Prevention and Combating of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
An analysis by the Open Society Initiative for South Africa asserted that non-enforcement of existing anti-corruption and anti-bribery legislation and regulations was widespread and…
Explore
Prevalence Score: 0 / 100
Corruption Watch’s Analysis of Corruption Trends (ACT) 2018 report found that bribery is one of the leading forms of corruption in South Africa with…
Explore