Procurement Risk:

High

Score:

41/100

Collapse
57 50/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. South Africa’s legal framework for procurement is underpinned by section 217(1) of the Constitution…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 75 / 100
The Public Finance Management Act establishes procedures for addressing financial misconduct including requirements that the accounting officer adopts systems to “prevent irregular expenditure, fruitless…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
In the latest financial year, procurement irregularities were incurred to the value R553 million, amounting to 4% of the Department of Defence’s goods and…
Explore
58 67/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The Public Finance Management Act requires public entities to develop their own procurement policies in line with the principles set out by National Treasury.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Neither the Department of Defence nor Armscor charged with armaments acquisition and disposal publicly disclose internal procurement processes and policies. General guidance on procurement…
Explore
Implementation Score: 75 / 100
South Africa has clear and detailed procurement policies governing procurement in the defence sector. [1] There are, however, shortcomings in implementation with recurrent findings…
Explore
59 83/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Auditor-General of South Africa is a key oversight mechanism for defence procurement and is independent and well-respected. The Department of Defence and Armscor…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
The Auditor-General has expressed opinions over procurement irregularities such as in relation to the procurement of unregistered medication during the COVID pandemic, but has…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Findings of the Auditor-General are made public in Department’s Annual Reports [1] and consolidated reports on national and provincial audit outcomes [2]. They both…
Explore
60 50/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 75 / 100
Forward planning is informed by the Defence Review prepared in 2015 while acquisitions are determined as part of the Strategic Capital Acquisition Master Plan…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 25 / 100
Neither the Department of Defence nor Armscor seemingly publish comprehensive notices of forward planning for defence purchases. [1] However, there is an Armscor public…
Explore
61 13/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 25 / 100
Awarded tenders are published on Armscor’s website with restrictions on requirement specifications and at times without publishing the details of the awarded bidder or…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Procurement data lacks significant data and the format is largely inaccessible. [1]
Explore
62 50/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
Bidders are required to sign disclosure form detailing conflicts of interest in terms of relationships to state employees or their own employment by the…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 50 / 100
The Auditor-General has previously found that the Department of Defence has awarded contracts to bidders which have not submitted the required disclosure forms [1].…
Explore
63 50/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 75 / 100
The process for identifying procurement requirements is generally comprehensive and is guided by the Defence Review as the highest-level strategy determining military posture. [1]…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Scrutiny of defence procurement by the Auditor-General and relevant parliamentary committees is largely concerned with regulatory compliance rather than alignment with high level strategies.…
Explore
Purchases Score: 50 / 100
The Department of Defence’s system for procurement planning is generally comprehensive and systematic, [1] but there are examples of large procurements seemingly made without…
Explore
64 63/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 25 / 100
South African procurement rules, per National Treasury regulations, establish open and competitive tendering as the default procurement method. [1] Deviations from open competition (such…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 100 / 100
Public entities are required to request deviations from National Treasury to obtain approval for single-source procurements and in this way, National Treasury provides oversight…
Explore
65 69/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 50 / 100
Officials in sensitive positions such a procurement are required to submit financial disclosures to a central system [1] and all state employees are prohibited…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
In the Auditor-General’s latest report for the Department of Defence it was indicated that the Auditor-General ” was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Regulations for supply chain management processes are publicly available [1]. The main document is the 2003 National Treasury Regulations for Supply Chain Management, issued…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
The Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) conducts routine audits of the Department of Defence (DoD), including reviewing procurement processes, tender specifications, and contract awards…
Explore
66 50/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
South Africa’s legal framework prohibits collusion among bidders through: Section 34 of the General Conditions of Contract, which defines “prohibited practices” including bid-rigging, price-fixing,…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act establishes penalties for corruption related offices including criminal prosecution and fines with jail sentences varying according…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 50 / 100
There is evidence that cases of collusion are investigated by relevant law enforcement bodies [1]. However, there is clear evidence of undue interference in…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
National Treasury’s training programs for procurement officials do not include training on identifying collusion patterns [1]. Training provided to officials is primarily related to…
Explore
67 44/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
National Treasury’s Contract Management Guide includes guidance on monitoring and reporting on the delivery of service providers as well as on sanctioning procedures. [1]…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Procurement and contracting data for the defence sector is limited. The Department of Defence contract information is not available on the departmental website nor…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 50 / 100
The Department of Defence uses legacy, non-integrated and stand-alone logistics and supply chain management information systems undermining the department’s ability to effectively monitor contract…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Effective contract management is severely undermined by a lack of capacity. The Department of Defence has revealed that a single project manager on average…
Explore
68 42/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 75 / 100
South Africa has several anti-corruption hotlines to which the public can submit complaints regarding procurement irregularities and procurement disputes can be taken up through…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 25 / 100
South Africa does not have a formal procurement dispute resolution mechanism and as a result, affected parties are forced to make use of protracted…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 25 / 100
While it is difficult to determine whether companies avoid submitting complaints related to procurement for fear of retribution, there is significant evidence that whistleblowing…
Explore
69 58/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Under the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, individuals convicted in terms of sections 12 and 13 of the Act dealing with offences…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 25 / 100
Very few cases of corruption have successfully been prosecuted particularly in relation to the findings of the State Capture Commission which revealed significant evidence…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 50 / 100
While criminal prosecution for fraud and corruption occurs, the rate of conviction is commonly considered inadequate [1]. Likewise, while individuals and companies have been…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
While offset agreements occur, South Africa does not have a legal or regulatory framework either prohibiting or permitting offsets [1]. It is worth noting…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
While the South African government conducted some due diligence with regard to offset contracts and third party contractors, this was by no means effective…
Explore
71 25/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
Related to offsets, South Africa has used formal policy instruments to agree offsets, credits and monitor offsets through the Defence Industrial Participation (DIP) program…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Basic details of offset contracts have been made public, but are by no means shared in a comprehensive, transparent form. [1] Where available, this…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
While the National Industrial Participation guidelines include provisions for monitoring trade offsets, [1] the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition has not released a…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
There is clear evidence that the actual investment amounts regarding the offsets agreed under the Strategic Defence Package were significantly lower than anticipated. Additionally,…
Explore
72 25/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 25 / 100
In terms of the “Arms Deal”, the responsibility for the selection of subcontractors related to offsets rests with the main contractor with the caveat…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no controls over the issue of intermediaries and agents and there are numerous examples of agents supporting the bidding process [1] and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
South Africa has not restricted the use of intermediaries and no relevant provisions for restricting the use of agents are found in the Public…
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The details of major arms acquisitions are not made public including questions around financing packages and payment timelines. Pieces of information have, however, become…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
There is documented evidence of political influence shaping the acquisitions process related to the Strategic Defence Package with political figures in selling nations involved…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Major purchases such as the Strategic Defence Package have supposedly been justified on the…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
The identification of acquisition requirements is not necessarily driven by domestic pressures, but there is evidence that acquisition and procurement processes have been politically…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question