Operational Risk:
Critical
Score:
0/100
51
0/100
Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?
View Question
In the Zimbabwe military there is no specific military doctrine to address issues of corruption [2]. As a commander’s initiative, battalion commanders and brigade…
Explore
Zimbabwe has no military doctrine that considers corruption a strategic issue for operations [1][2]. Therefore, this indicator is marked as Not Applicable.
Explore
52
0/100
Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?
View Question
There is no training of commanders on corruption issues [1]. The idea of training of commanders is not even an issue to be considered…
Explore
53
0/100
Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?
View Question
There is no consideration for any forward planning in the military or the defence forces for commanders when they are to be deployed [1].…
Explore
Corruption is not considered a strategic issue in military deployment and or operations [1]. For example, in internal deployments or operations, since 2003, the…
Explore
54
0/100
Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?
View Question
Trained professionals are not deployed in the field of operation to monitor any form of corruption therein [1]. The field of operation by military…
Explore
No Monitoring and Evaluation policy exist to monitor corruption risk in the field of operation [1] [2]. This is despite the fact that every…
Explore
There is no transparency since reports are not available to the public and or on the Minisitry of defence website [1] [2].
Explore
55
0/100
Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?
View Question
There are no guidelines on staff training on addressing corruption risk in contracting while deployed on operation or peacekeeping missions [1]. However, commanders do…
Explore
No training exists for troops or any of their commanders before and even during deployment [3]. This is the same even for those in…
Explore
56
NS/100
Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?
View Question
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There are currently no private contractors employed [1]. There are no policies guiding private…
Explore
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No private contractors in the military. There is no legal framework covering the employment…
Explore
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. No private contractors in the military. There is no legal framework covering the employment…
Explore
0
NA/100
View Question
Disregard of Corruption in-Country
Q51
NA/100
Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?
View Question
Q52
NA/100
Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?
View Question
Q53
NA/100
Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?
View QuestionCorruption within Mission
Q54
NA/100
Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?
View QuestionContracting
Q55
NA/100
Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?
View QuestionPrivate Security Companies
Q56
NA/100