Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

12/100

Collapse
57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. While the Defence Forces are guided by the Defence Procurement Act [Chapter 11:03], which…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
Corruption risk is not specifically mentioned in either the Defence Procurement Act nor the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act [1,2]. These…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence procurements are often subject to certain exceptions, as outlined in the Official Secrets Act [1]. These exceptions are frequently used by the Defence…
Explore
58 25/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 50 / 100
It should be noted that the defence procurement act, states the procedure on the assessment of needs; contract implementation and sign-off, and asset disposal,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
While the procurement process is handled within the defence forces guided to some extent with the Defence Procurement Act, and extended procedures as determined…
Explore
Implementation Score: 25 / 100
Section 3 of the Defence Procurement Act, Chapter 11:03, requires an establishment of the Defence Procurement Board, to provide for the manufacture and sale…
Explore
59 17/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The Defence forces have the Defence Procurement Board which is established through the Defence Procurement Act [1]. The Board recommends all procurement to the…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The law provides that Parliament has the authority and powers to scrutinise the defence procurement if the procedure was followed or not [1]. Parliament…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
Parliament has not been debated on procurement issues which pertains to the Defence sector [1]. Even if the Report of the Auditor General is…
Explore
60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no policies for Defence purchases and purchases are not made public. However, the defence purchase is guided by the Defence procurement board…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There are no notices or available information of planned purchases [1][2].
Explore
61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence actual purchases are not made public because they are part of classified information for security reasons [1]. Not only does the information about…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
It is difficult for the public to access data on defence purchases from the defence forces, in particular from the military even though it…
Explore
62 13/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
Like any other public entity, the Defence Forces are subject to Section 28 (a-f) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act,…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 0 / 100
Bidders’ information is not accessible in the military [2]. The military has a way of resisting with giving information, as it is easy for…
Explore
63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
It is challenging to assess whether the procurement requirements are derived from the national defence and or security strategy, because in the first place,…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Section 309 (2a) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, and Section 54 (1) and 54(2b) Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act, gives the…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
Since the defence strategy is not known to the public, it is difficult to know if the purchases were determined by the defence strategy…
Explore
64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
Defence procurement bidding is neither open nor advertised to the public [1]. Furthermore, the goods and equipment procured by the Defence Forces are not…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
Scrutiny is a public entity requirement as provided in Section 5 & 6 of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act which states that an…
Explore
65 13/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
The Defence Procurement Act [Chapter 11:03] established the Defence Procurement Fund which is responsible for the purchase and sale of equipment [1]. The Defence…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
Section 69 (1) (2a-g) provides that procuring entity shall keep a separate record for each procurement, the “procurement record”, which shall be marked with…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Under the PPDPA, public entities, ncluding those in the defence sector, are legally required to maintain transparent tender processes. Section 66 mandates that procurement documents…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
Section 69 (2) of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act provides that the tender process documents must be accessible to external verification and review…
Explore
66 31/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
Sectio 72(2) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act prohibits collusion between bidders—such as bid rigging or price fixing—and mandates disqualification of…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 50 / 100
The sanctions involve imprisonment and fine or both and it does not specify under what circumstances is fine possible or imprisonment [1][2]. However, in…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act provides that those implicated in acts of bribery are arraigned before the courts and prosecuted…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act mandates that officers in procurement units are supposed to go through training to familiarise themselves…
Explore
67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
Section 78(2)(a-m) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act provides that procuring entity shall ensure that every procurement contract it enters…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Section 69(3) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act states that the procuring entity shall, on request made at any time…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Section 78 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act mandates procuring authorities to monitor contract implementation, including timing and quality of services…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Section 78 and 87(d) of the Public Procurement Act establish that procuring entities may terminate contracts if performance obligations are not met and must seek compensation…
Explore
68 67/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Section 73 (2-5) of the Public Procurement Act provides a mechanism to complain where a potential or actual bidder in procurement proceedings who claims…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
The mechanism allows companies to complain about procurement malpractices including unfairness in any procurement processes since the panels are constituted by representatives from the…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
While the Constitution of Zimbabwe provides that an aggrieved person on issues related to administrative conduct should approach the courts for administrative justice, there…
Explore
69 42/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act (PPDPA) of 2017 provides a legal framework allowing authorities to take formal action against suppliers…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 25 / 100
Corruption and bribery violations including facilitation payments are criminalised under the Anti-Corruption Commission Act and the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, which apply…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Section 69 of the Public Procurement Act clearly states that any bidder convicted of bribery or corrupt behaviour must be removed from the procurement…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act which is the guiding statute does not provide specifications for offset contracts [1] [2].
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
No information is provided to show that there is due diligence on offset contracts [1] The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act…
Explore
71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
The defence sector does not have policies for offset contracts [1]. The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act [2] does not provide…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence on offset contracts in the defence sector [1]. Only when the country receives military equipment from other countries like China,…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Contractual agreements within the defence forces, are not made public [1]. This include the specific contractual performance, only known to the senior command structure…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The contractual agreements are not made public; there is no public evidence that breaches are acted upon [1][2]. The lack of transparency surrounding procurement…
Explore
72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no information on off-set contracts because the defence forces does not make the contracts available to verify this information [1][2].
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no regulations restricting the use of agents and or intermediaries, in the country’s procurement cycle [1]. The country’s statute Public Procurement and…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is a lack of regulation [1] as the use of intermediaries is not specified in the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets…
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The contractual agreements involving arms deal are not made to the public, and this include information such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Zimbabwe’s arms deal is determined by the historical political relations with countries such as…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
The Zimbabwean government does not publicly provide clear and justifiable military rationales for defence acquisitions or for choosing particular suppliers, particularly in its relationships…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is evidence that domestic political dynamics could influence defence acquisition decisions. The close…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question