Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

28/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 25/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. General procurement laws and regulations apply to the Ministry of Defence and the Zimbabwe…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 25 / 100
There is no explicit reference to corruption risks within the legislation; however, the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act provides rules that…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
There is no specific legislation for defence procurement. Defence procurement is covered by general procurement laws and regulations [1]. Defence purchases are generally procured…
Explore
Q58 58/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
There is a procurement directorate within the Zimbabwe Defence Forces which deals with needs assessments, procurements and contracts and also deals with disposal of…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The Procurement Act includes detailed procedures for the entire cycle. It requires all accounting officers of government departments, statutory bodies and state-owned entities to…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
The Procurement Directorate within the military has manuals outlining accounting and procurement procedures, in part, to ensure compliance with the Public Procurement and Disposal…
Explore
Q59 17/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The Procurement Directorate in the Zimbabwe Defence Forces submits its work for approval to the commanders of the military. The Public Procurement and Disposal…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
According to the law, Parliament can scrutinise reports submitted to it on all procurement [1]. Scrutiny includes calling witnesses and requesting supporting documents, which…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Parliamentary reports in recent times have not included procurement transactions from Defence Forces. This is due to the political power which the Zimbabwean military…
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There are no strategic defence reviews and white papers on potential defence purchases which are publicly published [1]. The documentation on forward planning for…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There is no information made publicly available on forward purchase plans [1, 2].
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence purchases are rarely made public. Even internally, only the personnel responsible for procurement have access to information on planned purchases [1]. In most…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data on defence purchases are not made public, even though the Public Procurement Act and Disposal of Public Assets Act requires that information be…
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NEI/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act obliges suppliers to comply with the provisions of Section 28, which requires suppliers to follow…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator, as it is difficult to ascertain whether the policies outlined in 62A are consistently implemented.…
Explore
Q63 13/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
It is impossible to assess whether procurement requirements derive from a national defence and security strategy since the strategy is not publicly available and…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
There is limited scrutiny of defence purchases by independent bodies such as the Office of the Auditor General Zimbabwe (OAG). The Auditor General has…
Explore
Purchases Score: NEI / 100
It is impossible to know if purchases are based on strategy or not since the strategy is not publicly available, and information on procurement…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NEI/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: NEI / 100
Defence procurements are not publicised, and it is difficult to ascertain the percentages of purchases that are done through open competition. This is except…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal Act requires scrutiny of all procurements by the Procurement Authority under the terms of Section 6 [1]. However, in…
Explore
Q65 19/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 0 / 100
Officers responsible for procurement attend internal procurement courses before being posted to their various units. In this respect, the officers are aware of the…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
Any public procurement entity, under the terms of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, is supposed to keep a record of the process clearly…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
All public procurement entities, are under the terms of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, obliged to keep records of the procurement process and…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 50 / 100
There is some external verification that the particular specifications of the tender are appropriate, but it is not comprehensive. Reviews of tender and procurement…
Explore
Q66 81/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
There is no legislation specifically covering defence procurement. The Public Procurement and Disposal Act guides the conduct of all procurement officers in all public…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal Act empowers procurement officers to disqualify bidders if they have been implicated in acts of bribery or corruption or…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 25 / 100
Those involved in acts of corruption in respect of procurement are arrested and arraigned before the courts [1]. The arrests and prosecutions have been…
Explore
Training Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act provides general obligations to train personnel involved in procurement entities to ensure they are equipped…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 31/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act states the obligations to have procurement contracts include the procuring entity’s right to inspect the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Contract variations are supposed to be made through signed documents by both parties, and the documents must be available for inspection by the public…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act requires the monitoring of contracts by procuring authorities [1]. The performance is monitored based on…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
It is not clear if most breaches of contract are fully acted upon. There are vested political interests that determines whether or not the…
Explore
Q68 67/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement Act has a mechanism to complain where malpractice is suspected or where unfair adjudication is suspected in respect of the bidding…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 50 / 100
The mechanism is relatively effective because the review panel is composed of individuals otherwise not resident in state institutions – this gives some semblance…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 50 / 100
There are instances where aggrieved bidders are reluctant to take procurement authorities to the Administrative Court even when they feel that their failure to…
Explore
Q69 88/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal Act empowers procurement officers/authorities to disqualify bidders if they have previously been implicated in acts of bribery or corruption…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 75 / 100
Cases of corruption by suppliers are generally investigated and prosecuted through formal processes [1]. However, in some instances, the investigations and prosecutions are viewed…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NEI / 100
There is some evidence that companies accused of misconduct or corrupt activities can be blacklisted from future procurement processes/contracts. [1, 2]. However, there is…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act does not directly regulate or prohibit offset contracts [1, 2].
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence or information which shows that there is due diligence on offset contracts, most these offset contract/agreements are usually opaque and…
Explore
Q71 25/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 25 / 100
There are no formal policies specific to offset contracts in the defence sector. Offset contracts are assumed to be guided by some provisions on…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
The government and the defence sector does not provide a detailed list of offset contracts. The few details of offset contracts in the public…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 25 / 100
Performance and delivery reports for offset contracts are produced primarily for internal use and are not publicised [1]. Internal circulation and the use of…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NEI / 100
Verifiable information on breaches of military/defence contracts, and enformcement is not readily available [1,2]. Therefore, this indicator is not scored and is marked “Not…
Explore
Q72 NEI/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: NEI / 100
Verifiable information on how how offset contracts are negotiated and finalised is not readily available. Given the lack of relevant evidence, this indicator is…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
No regulations are restricting the use of intermediaries or agents in the procurement laws of the country [1]. The government and military have previously…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
This indicator is marked “Not Applicable,” due to the fact that the country has no restrictions on the use of agents and intermediaries.
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The primary financial aspects of major arms deals are not made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts. This goes against the requirement…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Zimbabwe’s arms deals are primarily determined by the geopolitics and strategic interests of the…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government rarely speaks publicly about its military acquisitions; hence there are usually no…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. It is difficult to establish whether certain military acquisitions are a result of domestic…
Explore