Procurement Risk:

Very High

Score:

17/100

Government Policy

Collapse
Q57 75/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Ministry of Defence includes the Department for Public Procurement, responsible for covering the…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 100 / 100
Niger passed legislation that covers defence and security procurement with particular attention to corruption risks. Article 8 of the 2016 Code defines corruption as…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
It is difficult to evaluate the effectiveness both of the 2016 (1) and 2013 Decrees (2). However, some indirect evidence shows that the procurement…
Explore
Q58 50/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The defence procurement cycle is formalised and regulated by two decrees: the 2016 Code for Public Procurement (1) and the 2013 Decree that regulates…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
All purchases for the MoD fall under either the 2016 Code for Public Procurement (1) or under the 2013 Decree (2) that regulates security…
Explore
Implementation Score: 50 / 100
The legislation includes policies and procedures for each step of the implementation process of the procurement cycle (1), (2). However, it is difficult to…
Explore
Q59 8/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The procurement oversight mechanism is a formalised process. According to art. 71 of the 2013 Decree on public procurement regarding defence and security: “without…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The last audit was carried out by the State Inspectorate General in 2016 (1), who responds directly to the President and exercises oversight over…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Given the confidential dimension of the procurement process (1), formal oversight mechanisms are no ttransparent. According to Art. 71 of the 2013 Decree, the…
Explore
Q60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
The government has a process in place for acquisition planning as a result of the programming act of the Ministry of Defence. According to…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
The Nigerien government does not disclose information on planned defence purchases (1).
Explore
Q61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Defence purchases are rarely (if ever) made public, though, some acquisitions are made public through media (1,2). As in sub-indicator 58B, purchases of military…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
The assessor did not find any evidence that data regarding defence purchases were publically released.
Explore

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 25/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 50 / 100
The Nigerien government has adopted legislation detailing how it selects suppliers and sub-contractors. The legislation also includes anti-corruption standards for the main contracts or…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 0 / 100
Given the confidentiality of the content of the procedures (1), it is difficult to determine whether contractors and sub-contractors of the Ministry of Defence…
Explore
Q63 17/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
Niger’s procurement needs are primarily based on strategic security concerns and their efforts to contain the armed groups that have sprung up along its…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
An interviewee stated that the last time the Inspector General of the Army conducted oversight of procurement was in 2016. As for the Security…
Explore
Purchases Score: 50 / 100
The inspector general of the army lacks resources to carry out field missions, so auditing is not conducted to establish whether purchases are always…
Explore

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 13/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 25 / 100
The 2016 Public Procurement Code (1) and the 2013 Decree (2) provide for an open competition and include penalties against those attempting to undermine…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
The assessor did not find evidence that there is an oversight body to question single/restricted competition procedures (1,2).
Explore
Q65 31/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
According to Art. 28-29 of the 2013 Decree, tender boards can be formed for negotiations. Typically, they comprise of between three and five experts,…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 0 / 100
Article 35 of the 2013 Decree provides for a posteriori control: “Contracts negotiated by direct agreement in the context of the present decree are…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
There is transparency about the procedures of the tender board and the Code of Ethics. The system of ethics is available on the website…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Article 35 of the 2013 Decree provides for a posteriori control: “Contracts negotiated by direct agreement in the context of the present decree are…
Explore
Q66 25/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 25 / 100
Decree No. 2013/570/PRN/PM, Chapter XIII (Contrôle à postériori et sanctions A posteriori control and sanctions), Article 74, Section 3, prohibits acts of collusion among…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 75 / 100
Decree No. 2013/570/PRN/PM, Article 75, Sections 1–6, is clear about the sanctions imposed on companies convicted of bribery or corruption during a procurement bid.…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The assessor found no evidence that collusion has taken place in defence procurement or more broadly in public procurement in recent years (1,2). However,…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
Decree No. 2013/570/PRN/PM, Chapter XIII (Contrôle à postériori et sanctions A posteriori control and sanctions), Article 74, Section 3, prohibits acts of collusion among…
Explore

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 13/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 50 / 100
There are several formal policies to ensure that contractors meet their service and delivery obligations. These are mentioned in Art. 10 of the 2013…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Due to the confidentiality of the procurement process (1), the assessor identified no evidence related to reporting and delivery obligations of contractors.
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The Department of Public Procurement of the Ministry of Defence is composed of two divisions one regulates the procurement process, and another is responsible…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Given the confidentiality of the procurement process (1), it is not possible to evaluate if there were breaches of contract and if they are…
Explore
Q68 NEI/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
The 2016 Code on Public Procurement provides bidders with non-jurisdictional and jurisdictional mechanisms to file complaints about perceived malpractices or infringements (Art. 164-169) (1).…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 100 / 100
The assessor did not find any evidence that there were companies that have lodged complaints about being unfairly disadvantaged or debarred from future procurements.…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
This indicator has not been assigned a score due to insufficient information or evidence. Neither the 2016 Procurement Code (1) nor the 2013 Decree…
Explore
Q69 33/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Decree 2013/570/PRN/PM, Article 75, Sections 1–6 states clearly the sanctions that can be imposed on companies convicted of corrupt activities as a supplier. Article…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 0 / 100
Despite the formal inclusions of sanctions in the legislation, the assessor found no evidence of corruption cases being investigated or prosecuted, and therefore, no…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
Despite the formal inclusions of sanctions in the legislation, the assessor found no evidence of corruption cases being investigated or prosecuted, and therefore, no…
Explore

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Neither the 2016 Code for Public Procurement (1) nor the 2013 Decree (2) includes any provisions on offset contracts.
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Neither the 2016 Code for Public Procurement (1) nor the 2013 Decree (2) includes any provisions on offset contracts.
Explore
Q71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
The assessor found no formal policies or procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts in the case of Niger (1,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The assessor found no formal policies or procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts in the case of Niger (1,…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
The assessor found no formal policies or procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts in the case of Niger (1,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The assessor found no formal policies or procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts in the case of Niger (1,…
Explore
Q72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
The assessor found no formal policies or procedures that outline the reporting and delivery obligations for offset contracts in the case of Niger (1,…
Explore

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is no indication that the government imposes any restrictions over the use of agents or intermediaries. No relevant provisions were found in the…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
There is no indication that the government imposes any restrictions over the use of agents or intermediaries. No relevant provisions were found in the…
Explore

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that the existence of a financing package and the identity of providers is usually made public (1,2). However, some major…
Explore

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Given the secrecy around the acquisition process, it is difficult to know if acquisitions…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The lack of justification(s) provided by the government for its (secret) acquisitions may warrant…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Given the secrecy around the acquisition process, it is difficult to know if acquisitions…
Explore