Procurement Risk:

Critical

Score:

9/100

Collapse
57 0/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act 2018 is indeed a comprehensive legal…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 0 / 100
Despite the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 being hailed as a milestone in combating corruption in South Sudan, its architects failed…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
The effectiveness of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 especially with regard to the procurement in the defence sector is hampered…
Explore
58 8/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal Act is very particular in Section 36 (1), (2), (3) (4) and (5). Section (4) is clear that security…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There are no publicly available documents that provides the defence procurement cycle in South Sudan, this is in part because of the sensitive nature…
Explore
Implementation Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of established policies or procedures for implementing the procurement cycle. Similarly, there have been no public reports on weapons acquisitions…
Explore
59 8/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act 2018 formally establishes the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Authority (PPDAA), which is intended to…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 0 / 100
South Sudan is in a unique position because its audit mechanisms are not only supposed to adhere to domestic mechanisms but also international set…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no publicly available information in the form of reports, press statements, or financial disclosures regarding defence procurement in South Sudan. Those monitoring…
Explore
60 0/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
There is any publicly available information regarding defence purchases that were made public more so for the timelines stated here. The lack of public…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
There is no publicly available information published by the government regarding forward arms purchase. There is also no publicly available information that requires the…
Explore
61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
There is no comprehensive detail of actual defence purchases. Despite the ongoing internal conflicts where presence of new weapons is being exhibited, there is…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Despite the availability of data on the defence expenditure, there is rarely data released to the public and which is accessible on the actual…
Explore
62 13/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 25 / 100
According to the Ministry of Defence and Veteran affairs [1], internal measures and the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act 2018 [2] provide…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 0 / 100
South Sudan’s defence procurement laws and policies are not consistently implemented, including for strategically important suppliers [1]. Despite formal procedures outlined in the Public…
Explore
63 0/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
Since the SPLA became a regular Army in 2018, there is not publicly available national defence and strategy document to examine the nexus between…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
While South Sudan has formal policies that require auditing of public procurement and in the case of defence and security establishment, the Defence Committee…
Explore
Purchases Score: 0 / 100
The conflict situation in South Sudan means that the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs is keen on dealing with the crisis in the…
Explore
64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
For several years South Sudan has been subjected to a United Nations arms embargo, which has significantly restricted its ability to procure arms [1].…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
Given the complex security environment in South Sudan, coupled with ongoing sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council, there is limited publicly available information…
Explore
65 31/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
Section 18 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act 2018 addresses the issue of conflict of interest in public procurement with clear…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 25 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act 2018 has important provisions that can provide some audit trail for officials involved in the selection…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
With the existing Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act (2018) [1] and the South Sudan Audit Chamber Act, 2011 [2] tender boards are…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
In theory, there are multiple layers of scrutinising tender process in South Sudan according to the existing laws. For example, the South Sudan Audit…
Explore
66 44/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 75 / 100
In addition to the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018, there are laws which in theory could act as the legal framework…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Sections 81 and 82 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018, outline clear legislation and guidelines that exclude individuals or companies…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Despite significant legal reforms and frameworks, a search on local and regional media reports shows that the government of South Sudan did not announce…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
Section 8 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018, highlights the need for capacity building among officials to curb procurement challenges…
Explore
67 0/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
Section 31 (c) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 [1] gives the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets unit the…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
According to Section 51 (1) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, once a contract has come into force, the procuring entity…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
Monitoring regarding contractors meeting their contractual obligations in South Sudan is challenging due to several factors. Although the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 outlines mechanisms and procedures that are intended to ensure contractors meet their obligations [1]. However,…
Explore
68 25/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 75 / 100
Section 22 of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 gives companies an avenue to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement. Section…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 0 / 100
The effectiveness and accessibility of complaints mechanism that companies can use to complain about malpractice in public procurement is not evident in South Sudan.…
Explore
Retaliation Score: 0 / 100
An analysis of local, regional and international media between 2000 and 2024 did not reveal any public information regarding a company that faced retaliation…
Explore
69 33/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
Chapter IV of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 explains the nature and processes of sanctions that companies which fail to…
Explore
Undue influence Score: 0 / 100
Corruption cases within South Sudan’s defence sector are not investigated or prosecuted through fully formal and independent processes, and they are rampantly influenced by…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: 0 / 100
While Sections (81) and (82) [1] of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 outline the sanctions which companies that have engaged…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
There is no specific mention of regulations for offset contracts in important documents such as the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
South Sudan has struggled to enforce due diligence provisions despite some laws requiring companies to do so. For example, the 2009 Land Act states…
Explore
71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
An examination of procurement-related policies, including the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 [1], and the Public Financial Management and Accountability Act,…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There are pre-independence and post -independence laws that aim to improve transparency in public sector management. Some of these laws include the 2012 Companies…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
An analysis of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 [1], and the Public Financial Management and Accountability Act, 2011 [2], did…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
Due to the opaque nature of procurement in the defence and security sector, it is challenging to find any publicly available information regarding the…
Explore
72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Offset or compensatory contracts in the South Sudanese defence sector are handled with virtually no transparency and minimal competition. Investigative reporting by the Organized…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 [1], and the Public Financial Management and Accountability Act, 2011 [2], which regulate procurement by…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
The Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Act, 2018 [1], and the Public Financial Management and Accountability Act, 2011 [2], which regulate government procurement…
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Despite having the largest defence budget in the region, there is no publicly available information on the financial arrangements surrounding major arms deals in…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. South Sudan continues to source defence acquisitions from a variety of countries despite being…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Despite the lack of transparency in defence and security acquisitions, the government of South…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is increasing domestic pressure to lift the arms embargo on South Sudan to…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question