Operational Risk:

Critical

Score:

5/100

Next Risk Category Right Arrow
Left Arrow Back to Burkina Faso Overview

Disregard of Corruption in-Country

Collapse
Q51 25/100

Do the armed forces have military doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations?

View Question
Military doctrine Score: 25 / 100
There is no evidence that Burkina Faso’s military has a doctrine addressing corruption as a strategic issue on operations. However, the military does recognize…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Since there is no military doctrine that considers corruption a strategic issue for operations, this sub-indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Q52 0/100

Is there training in corruption issues for commanders at all levels in order to ensure that these commanders are clear on the corruption issues they may face during deployment?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Although they attend training sessions before deployment, these sessions are not usually meant to address corruption. The pre-deployment training sessions are for military commanders,…
Explore
Q53 0/100

Is corruption as a strategic issue considered in the forward planning of operations? If so, is there evidence that commanders at all levels apply this knowledge in the field?

View Question
Forward planning Score: 0 / 100
Transparency International’s Defence and Sceurity Programme (2016) declared that “10 out of the top 25 TCCs are in band ‘F’ for preparing their troops…
Explore
Application Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that corruption is address in forward planning. Thus, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore

Corruption within Mission

Expand
Q54 0/100

Are trained professionals regularly deployed to monitor corruption risk in the field (whether deployed on operations or peacekeeping missions)?

View Question
Corruption monitoring Score: 0 / 100
According to TI-DS (2016) “TCCs, including Burkina Faso, have no anti-corruption training for troops and commanders before they deploy on operations” (1). Over the…
Explore
M&E policy Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence that corruption monitoring is conducted in operations. Thus, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
There is no evidence that corruption monitoring is conducted in operations. Thus, this indicator has been marked Not Applicable.
Explore

Contracting

Expand
Q55 0/100

Are there guidelines, and staff training, on addressing corruption risks in contracting whilst on deployed operations or peacekeeping missions?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
Most of the guidelines available for mission staff members are not relevant to corruption risks in procurement and contracting. According to TI-DS (2016) “at…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
Usually, UN Peacekeeping Mission’s staff members do not attend training specifically on corruption risks in procurement and contracting (1). According to Transparency International training…
Explore

Private Security Companies

Expand
Q56 NS/100

Are private military contractors employed and if so, are they subject to a similar level of scrutiny as for the armed forces?

View Question
Policies Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI.
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI.
Explore
Enforcement Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI.
Explore