Political Risk:

Moderate

Score:

52/100

Collapse
1 58/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
Article 98 of the Beninese Constitution classifies in the field of law, “the rules relating to constraints imposed in the interest of national defence…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 50 / 100
In accordance with its constitutional prerogative, the Beninese parliament examines and adopts security laws. In recent years, it has passed a few laws to…
Explore
Independent legislature scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
As a rule, the executive power and the military do not exert undue pressure on parliament to vote in their favor. The army is…
Explore
2 21/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 100 / 100
At the beginning of each legislature, after the election of the Board, the National Assembly shall set up five standing commissions for the study…
Explore
Expertise Score: 25 / 100
The Board of the National Assembly allocates the MPs to the commissions after consultation with the presidents of the parliamentary groups, considering as far…
Explore
Responsive policymaking Score: 0 / 100
According to the Rules of Procedures of the National Assembly, the Speaker of the National Assembly refers all issues relating to bills or proposals…
Explore
Short-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The commissions are convened at the request of their chairperson, but they are not required to meet monthly [1]. The committee is not in…
Explore
Long-term oversight Score: 0 / 100
The National Assembly may authorize standing commissions or special and temporary commissions to carry out fact-finding or investigative missions on issues within their competence…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 0 / 100
During the study of the budget of the various ministries, the Members of the commission make observations and/or amendments to the initial draft that…
Explore
3 0/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Scope of involvement Score: 0 / 100
There is no formal, written defence policy or security strategy. So there is no public debate on this. Currently, the recently established Joint Centre…
Explore
Scope of debate Score: NA / 100
There is no official defense strategy document [1]. The process of its drafting is ongoing but there is no formal debate between the government…
Explore
Public consultations Score: 0 / 100
There is no formal national defence policy or national security strategy [1]. The process of its development is ongoing but citizens are not consulted…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
In Benin, there is no formal defense policy or security strategy made public, and no official document related to these policies is disseminated. Defense…
Explore
4 42/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Policy of openness Score: 0 / 100
There is no obligation on defence and security institutions to establish permanent consultations with civil society organizations for information sharing purposes [1]. Therefore, there…
Explore
CSO protections Score: 50 / 100
According to Article 23 of the Beninese Constitution, freedom of expression is guaranteed for all people and/or institutions [1]. This same constitution guarantees, under…
Explore
Practice of openness Score: 75 / 100
CSOs have been able to work with defence and security institutions specifically on corruption issues, but not on a regular and in-depth basis [1].…
Explore
5 75/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification status Score: 100 / 100
Benin is not a defence exporter [1]. Benin has signed up and ratified on August 5, 2004 at least the UNCAC Convention [2].
Explore
Compliance Score: 50 / 100
Benin has complied with most of its obligations in priority areas covered by the UNCAC, which it has ratified. As an example, Benin’s law…
Explore
6 50/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Public debate Score: 25 / 100
There has been a public debate on defence issues since the rise of the terrorist threat and violent extremism. This debate is mainly taking…
Explore
Government engagement in public discourse Score: 75 / 100
The government participates in debates with universities, opinion makers and CSOs on defence issues. Very often, it is a reaction of the government spokesman…
Explore
7 25/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Anti-corruption policy Score: 50 / 100
Benin had an anti-corruption policy based around Law No. 2011-20 on the fight against corruption and other related offenses in the Republic of Benin.…
Explore
Effective implementation Score: 0 / 100
There is no action plan at the ministerial level that reflects institutional weaknesses in the fight against corruption [1]. However, from 2024 to 2026,…
Explore
8 92/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Mandate and resources Score: 75 / 100
Within the Beninese defence and security forces, there are identifiable structures whose mandate is to promote integrity and fight corruption. Among them, there is…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The General Inspectorate of the Armed Forces (IGA) is not part of the chain of command because it is placed under the direct authority…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
The personnel of the Ministerial Committee for Risk Management (CMMR) and the Ministerial Committee for Internal Audit (CMAI) a priori understand the corruption risks…
Explore
9 NS/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Public opinion has mixed confidence in defence and security institutions to tackle the problem…
Explore
10 92/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question
Risk assessments Score: 75 / 100
The Ministerial Committee for Risk Management (CMMR) draws up a risk map [1], including those related to corruption. The development of the mapping follows…
Explore
Regularity Score: 100 / 100
The risk map is updated every year. This update is carried out by each directorate by the end of September each year at the…
Explore
Inputs to anti-corruption policy Score: 100 / 100
The risk map is updated every year [1] and this is used to improve the anti-corruption practices in the ministry [2]. Base on the…
Explore
11 42/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Acquisition planning process Score: 75 / 100
There is no formal defence strategy. Purchases are therefore planned on the basis of the strategic needs identified to effectively face the country’s defence…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
The multi-year programming document (over three years) is proactively published on the website of the Budget Directorate-General. It includes the justification for purchases, chains…
Explore
External oversight Score: 0 / 100
The National Assembly has the power to control government action, including with regard to defence issues,[1]. However,but there is no evidence that the National…
Explore
12 88/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 75 / 100
The defence budget contains comprehensive information on expenditure across functions but information on the acquisition and maintenance of military equipment is not available in…
Explore
Timeliness Score: 100 / 100
The National Assembly should receive the Finance Bill no later than one week before the opening of the October session [1]. In practice, the…
Explore
13 0/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Formal rights Score: 0 / 100
The Defence Committee does not review the defence budget. According to the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly, matters with a financial impact…
Explore
Influence on decision-making Score: NA / 100
The Defence Committee does not review the defence budget so this indicator is marked Not Applicable. According to the Rules of Procedure of the…
Explore
14 75/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Proactive publication Score: 50 / 100
In Benin, the defence budget as well as all other budgets are made public, it is an approach aimed at improving public management, strengthening…
Explore
Comprehensiveness Score: 100 / 100
Monthly bulletins and quarterly reports on the implementation of the budget – including the defence budget – are produced during the year and made…
Explore
Response to information requests Score: 75 / 100
Public information on the budget is available on the website of the Budget Directorate-General [1]. Citizens are invited to consult the said information online…
Explore
15 0/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
It is difficult to find a single, comprehensive publication on all B enin’s revenues [1]. According to the people interviewed, thedefence sector is essentially…
Explore
Institutional scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
The Court of Auditors is the supreme audit institution in Benin and the internal audit office of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) are responsible…
Explore
Public scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
Public scrutiny of non-central government sources of funding is non-existent [1]. No media, citizens or civil society scrutiny reports on external defence funding are…
Explore
16 75/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Activity Score: 100 / 100
The Ministerial Internal Audit Committee (CMAI) defines the audit policy of the Ministry of Defence; ensures the quality of the internal control system aimed…
Explore
Enabling oversight Score: 0 / 100
The National Assembly is responsible for monitoring government action, as well as for supervising the implementation of the budget. The National Assembly does not…
Explore
External scrutiny Score: 100 / 100
Internal audit reports are primarily intended for departmental officials, internal audit committees, and internal control bodies to ensure continuous improvement of operations and controls.…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
Benin’s Ministry of Defence regularly takes into account the conclusions of audits and controls carried out on its practices. This is part of a…
Explore
17 69/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question
Activity Score: 75 / 100
In Benin, the external audit of ministries and public institutions, including defence and security institutions, is mainly carried out by the Court of Auditors…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
The Court of Auditors is an institution of the Republic created by the Constitution [1]. It is independent of the executive and legislative powers.…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
The Court of Auditors shall produce an annual report in which it sets out the main observations it has made, the conclusions it has…
Explore
Institutional outcomes Score: 100 / 100
Benin’s Ministry of Defence regularly takes into account the recommendations of the Court of Auditors [1]. The Ministerial Committee for Risk Management (CMMR) and…
Explore
18 100/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 100 / 100
In Benin, the defence institution is the army; and it is not constitutionally allowed to have majority or financial interests in companies associated with…
Explore
Defence institutions: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of individual defence personnel being involved in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation. [1] Public officials, including defense…
Explore
Individual defence personnel: Financial or controlling interests in practice Score: 100 / 100
There are no cases of individual defence institutions personnel being involved in businesses relating to the country’s natural resource exploitation [1]. Public officials, including…
Explore
Transparency Score: NA / 100
Public officials, including defense and security forces, must not exercise any function, or engage in any transaction, nor hold a financial or commercial interest…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Public officials, includingdefence and security forces, must not exercise any function, or engage in any transaction, nor hold a financial or commercial interest incompatible…
Explore
19 100/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Penetration of organised crime Score: 100 / 100
There is no evidence of military involvement in areas where organized crime operates [1]. No media investigation or prosecution report provides evidence of such…
Explore
Government response Score: 100 / 100
The government is aware of the possibility of organised crime in the defence and security sector [1]. To prevent this, soldiers first undergo a…
Explore
20 92/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question
Existence of policing function Score: 75 / 100
There is an Armed Forces Police Service within the national police force. This unit ensures compliance with laws and regulations within the Defense and…
Explore
Independence Score: 100 / 100
These police functions are independent of the bodies they investigate [1]. As a police unit, it does not report hierarchically to the military high…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
Cases are investigated or prosecuted through formal processes and there is no evidence of undue political influence. For example, in 2024, 14 servicemen, all…
Explore
21 0/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Independence Score: 0 / 100
A National Intelligence Control Commission is established to review the policies, administration and budget of the intelligence service. [1] It is an independent administrative…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: NA / 100
In practice, the National Intelligence Control Commission, in 2024, is still not installed so there is no effective control of intelligence services and this…
Explore
22 0/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question
Objective selection criteria Score: 0 / 100
In Benin, the selection criteria for senior positions in the intelligence services are not made public in detail. The decree creating the intelligence services…
Explore
Selection bias Score: 0 / 100
There is no evidence of opportunity for intervention by third parties that may result in selection bias or undue influence in the selection of…
Explore
Vetting process Score: 0 / 100
Leadership positions in the intelligence services are mainly occupied by the defence and security forces [1]. A morality investigation shall be carried out by…
Explore
23 100/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question
Signatory and Ratification Score: 100 / 100
Benin signed the Army Trade Treaty (ATT) on 3 June 2013, at the opening signing ceremony in New York. It then ratified the treaty…
Explore
Compliance Score: 100 / 100
Benin has taken significant measures to comply with the three ATT articles and contribute to a more responsible and regulated arms trade. For example,…
Explore
Parliamentary scrutiny Score: NA / 100
Our desk research and interviews confirm that Benin is not an arm exporter. Benin has no arms manufacturing facilities [1] [2]. Therefore, this sub-indicator…
Explore
76 0/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
The country has no framework for regulating lobbying activity [1]. In Benin, there is very little evidence of the existence of lobbying activities with…
Explore
Disclosure: Public officials Score: NA / 100
The country has no framework for regulating lobbying activity so this indicator is marked Not Applicable [1]. In Benin, there is very little evidence…
Explore
Lobbyist registration system Score: NA / 100
The country has no framework for regulating lobbying activity so this indicator is marked Not Applicable [1]. In Benin, there is very little evidence…
Explore
Oversight & enforcement Score: NA / 100
The country has no framework for regulating lobbying activity so this indicator is marked Not Applicable [1]. In Benin, there is very little evidence…
Explore

Defence and Security Policy and Policy Transparency

Expand
Q1 NA/100

Is there formal provision for effective and independent legislative scrutiny of defence policy?

View Question
Q2 NA/100

Does the country have an identifiable and effective parliamentary defence and security committee (or similar such organisations) to exercise oversight?

View Question
Q3 NA/100

Is the country’s national defence policy or national security strategy debated and publicly available?

View Question
Q4 NA/100

Do defence and security institutions have a policy, or evidence, of openness towards civil society organisations (CSOs) when dealing with issues of corruption?

View Question
Q5 NA/100

Has the country signed up to the following international anti-corruption instruments: UNCAC and the OECD Convention?

View Question
Q6 NA/100

Is there evidence of regular, active public debate on issues of defence? If yes, does the government participate in this debate?

View Question
Q7 NA/100

Does the country have an openly stated and effectively implemented anti-corruption policy for the defence sector?

View Question
Q8 NA/100

Are there independent, well-resourced, and effective institutions within defence and security tasked with building integrity and countering corruption?

View Question
Q9 NA/100

Does the public trust the institutions of defence and security to tackle the issue of bribery and corruption in their establishments?

View Question
Q10 NA/100

Are there regular assessments of the areas of greatest corruption risk for ministry and armed forces personnel, and are the findings used as inputs to the anti-corruption policy?

View Question

Defence Budgets

Expand
Q11 NA/100

Does the country have a process for acquisition planning that involves clear oversight, and is it publicly available?

View Question
Q12 NA/100

Is the defence budget transparent, showing key items of expenditure? And it is provided to the legislature in a timely fashion?

View Question
Q13 NA/100

Is there a legislative committee (or other appropriate body) responsible for defence budget scrutiny and analysis in an effective way?

View Question
Q14 NA/100

Is the approved defence budget made publicly available? In practice, can citizens, civil society, and the media obtain detailed information on the defence budget?

View Question
Q15 NA/100

Are sources of defence income other than from central government allocation (from equipment sales or property disposal, for example) published and scrutinised?

View Question
Q16 NA/100

Is there an effective internal audit process for defence ministry expenditure (that is, for example, transparent, conducted by appropriately skilled individuals, and subject to parliamentary oversight)?

View Question
Q17 NA/100

Is there effective and transparent external auditing of military defence expenditure?

View Question

Nexus of Defence and National Assets

Expand
Q18 NA/100

Is there evidence that the country’s defence institutions have controlling or financial interests in businesses associated with the country’s natural resource exploitation and, if so, are these interests publicly stated and subject to scrutiny?

View Question

Organised Crime

Expand
Q19 NA/100

Is there evidence, for example through media investigations or prosecution reports, of a penetration of organised crime into the defence and security sector? If no, is there evidence that the government is alert and prepared for this risk?

View Question
Q20 NA/100

Is there policing to investigate corruption and organised crime within the defence services and is there evidence of the effectiveness of this policing?

View Question

Control of Intelligence Services

Expand
Q21 NA/100

Are the policies, administration, and budgets of the intelligence services subject to effective and independent oversight?

View Question
Q22 NA/100

Are senior positions within the intelligence services filled on the basis of objective selection criteria, and are appointees subject to investigation of their suitability and prior conduct?

View Question

Export Controls

Expand
Q23 NA/100

Does the government have a well-scrutinised process for arms export decisions that aligns with Articles 7.1.iv, 11.5, and 15.6 of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)?

View Question

Lobbying in Defence

Expand
Q76 NA/100

Does the country regulate lobbying of defence institutions?

View Question