Procurement Risk:

High

Score:

35/100

Collapse
57 63/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Legal framework Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. Benin has general legislation on procurement of all kinds. This is the Public Procurement…
Explore
Corruption risks Score: 100 / 100
In general, the law on public procurement recognizes the risks of corruption. For this, sanctions are clearly defined in Articles 122 to 128 of…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 25 / 100
The means of effectively verifying the effectiveness of the application of this legislation are very limited because this is covered by the defense secrecy…
Explore
58 67/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Formal procedures Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement Code formalises the entire procurement cycle in all materials, including in the defence sector. Article 23 imposes the obligation to determine…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
Detailed procedures for the entire defence procurement cycle are disclosed to officials involved in the supply chain, and not to the public [1]. The…
Explore
Implementation Score: 100 / 100
Legislation provides for three types of procurement procedure: open, restricted and direct. The circumstances in which the administration may resort to a procedure are…
Explore
59 67/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Independence Score: 75 / 100
Article 9 of the Public Procurement Code specifies that “the control and regulation functions shall be exercised independently” [1]. The Code then created a…
Explore
Effectiveness Score: 100 / 100
Any contract whose value exceeds the thresholds set by decree (100 million CFA for infrastructures, 70 million CFA for supplies and services, 50 million…
Explore
Transparency Score: 25 / 100
A website has been created to centralise all information related to public procurement [1]. On the site, public calls for tenders are published. A…
Explore
60 13/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Policies Score: 25 / 100
There is no strategic defence review or white paper [1]. Benin’s defense procurement planning appears to respond to the country’s immediate needs and security…
Explore
Notice of planned purchases Score: 0 / 100
In Benin, potential defence purchases are generally not made public due to the sensitive nature of security and national defense. Although the government follows…
Explore
61 0/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question
Comprehensiveness Score: 0 / 100
In 2024, the press announced the receipt by the Beninese army of new drones to be used in the fight against terrorism in the…
Explore
Accessible data Score: 0 / 100
Data on currentdefence purchases is generally not publicly accessible due to the sensitive and classified nature of defense-related procurement.This information is often kept confidential…
Explore
62 75/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Formal policies Score: 75 / 100
The Public Procurement Code details the conditions and documents to be provided by bidders to a public procurement. For example, candidates must provide documents…
Explore
Consistent implementation Score: 75 / 100
There is evidence that the official policies and laws are implemented for defence and security public procurement contracts which are not covered by secret.…
Explore
63 33/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question
Procurement requirements Score: 0 / 100
There is no formalised defence and security strategy [1]. It cannot therefore be said that the supply needs are the result of such a…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 0 / 100
There is no formalised defence and security strategy. Purchases of equipment for the armed forces are subject to a certain control, in accordance with…
Explore
Purchases Score: 100 / 100
The Ministry of Defence bases purchases on needs that are clearly identified and quantified in advance [1]. It is done according to military priorities,…
Explore
64 0/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Open competition Score: 0 / 100
There is no public data on the number of defence procurements, as the law excludes certain contracts from the obligation to publish [1]. It…
Explore
Scrutiny of single/restricted competition procedures Score: 0 / 100
About single source and restricted competition procedure contracts, Decree N°2020-603 of 23 December 2020 laying down the procedures and procedures for the award of…
Explore
65 50/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Conflicts of interest Score: 25 / 100
Civil servants and military officers who play a role in the design of the tender specifications or in the decisions of the tender committee…
Explore
Audit Trail Score: 50 / 100
The tender commissions are subject to an external audit, done with the aim of identifying or not the inadequacies in the decisions taken by…
Explore
Transparency Score: 100 / 100
Regulations and codes of conduct of tender commissions are fully transparent [1] [2]. The Code of Ethics and Deontology for Public Procurement clearly sets…
Explore
Scrutiny Score: 25 / 100
The National Directorate for the Control of Public Procurement, Tthe Public Procurement Regulatory Authority are the external bodies which verify that the particular specifications…
Explore
66 56/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 50 / 100
The Public Procurement Code prohibits any participation in collusion practices between tenderers in order to set the prices of tenders at artificial and non-competitive…
Explore
Sanctions Score: 100 / 100
The Public Procurement Code clearly provides penalties against bidders and public officials, including defence and security officers, involved in fraudulent acts in the context…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
The cases are investigated and sanctioned by the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (ARMP) [1]. The ARMP is independent and is not subject to undue…
Explore
Training Score: 0 / 100
There is no specific, regular and mandatory training for the Procurement officials to identify collusion patterns and report potential malpractice. This is something discussed…
Explore
67 81/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Reporting policies & procedures Score: 100 / 100
There are formal policies and procedures that outline how to monitor, assess and report upon a supplier’s service and or delivery obligations. Any disputes…
Explore
Transparency Score: 50 / 100
Only public procurement for works, supplies and services for the day-to-day operation of the defence and security administration are not covered by secrecy [1].…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 100 / 100
The person responsible for public procurement (PRMP) keeps statistics and performance indicators, and for draws up reports on the award and execution of contracts…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 75 / 100
Most of contract violations are dealt with adequately and in accordance with the provisions of the Public Procurement Code. Problems, when they are minor,…
Explore
68 88/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Complaints mechanisms Score: 100 / 100
Contract violations are dealt with adequately and in accordance with the provisions of the Public Procurement Code. Problems, when they are minor, are dealt…
Explore
Effectiveness and Accessibility Score: 75 / 100
There are no specific costs associated with complaint mechanisms [1]. Companies consider them to be effective and make regular use of them. In 2023,…
Explore
Retaliation Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. We were unable to note any formal complaints made by companies against defence and security…
Explore
69 NEI/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question
Sanctions Score: NEI / 100
Even if decision related to security sector is rare on the website, it is possible to notice that in the event of corruption-related offences,…
Explore
Undue influence Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. We were unable to note any formal complaints made by companies against defence and security…
Explore
Application of sanctions Score: NEI / 100
There is not enough evidence to score this indicator. The ARMP has a “red list” of excluded companies and has also made decisions on…
Explore
70 0/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Legal framework Score: 0 / 100
Neither the Public Procurement Code nor the decree setting out the terms and conditions for the award of defence contracts requiring secrecy prohibits, authorises…
Explore
Due diligence Score: 0 / 100
Neither the Public Procurement Code nor the decree setting out the terms and conditions for the award of defence contracts requiring secrecy prohibits, authorises…
Explore
71 0/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Policies & procedures Score: 0 / 100
There is no provision from the Public Procurement Code either prohibiting, authorising or regulating the use of offset contracts [1]. Although this interpreted by…
Explore
Transparency Score: 0 / 100
There is no provision from the Public Procurement Code either prohibiting, authorising or regulating the use of offset contracts [1]. Although this interpreted by…
Explore
Monitoring Score: 0 / 100
There is no provision from the Public Procurement Code either prohibiting, authorising or regulating the use of offset contracts [1]. Although this interpreted by…
Explore
Enforcement Score: 0 / 100
There is no provision from the Public Procurement Code either prohibiting, authorising or regulating the use of offset contracts [1]. Although this interpreted by…
Explore
72 0/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
There is no provision from the Public Procurement Code about offset contracts [1]. In practice, procurement officials do not use this type of contract…
Explore
73 0/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question
Policies Score: 0 / 100
The use of agents and intermediaries is not provided for by law [1] [2] [3]. The government has not made public pronouncements regarding this,…
Explore
Enforcement Score: NA / 100
The use of agents and intermediaries is not regulated by the law [1] [2] [3]. Therefore, this indicator is marked Not Applicable.
Explore
74 0/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question
Score: 0 / 100
Details of the financing package surrounding large arms deals (such as payment terms, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) are generally not…
Explore
75 NS/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question
Prevalence: selling nations Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government formulates its own military equipment procurement requirements based on the country’s strategic…
Explore
Justification Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. The government is not in the habit of publicly discussing and justifying its choices…
Explore
Prevalence: domestic pressures Score: NS / 100
This indicator is not assigned a score in the GDI. There is no evidence that acquisitions are granted as a result of domestic political…
Explore
0 NA/100

View Question

Government Policy

Expand
Q57 NA/100

Does the country have legislation covering defence and security procurement with clauses specific to corruption risks, and are any items exempt from these laws?

View Question
Q58 NA/100

Is the defence procurement cycle process, from assessment of needs, through contract implementation and sign-off, all the way to asset disposal, disclosed to the public?

View Question
Q59 NA/100

Are defence procurement oversight mechanisms in place and are these oversight mechanisms active and transparent?

View Question
Q60 NA/100

Are potential defence purchases made public?

View Question
Q61 NA/100

Are actual defence purchases made public?

View Question

Capability Gap and Requirements Definition

Expand
Q62 NA/100

What procedures and standards are companies required to have – such as compliance programmes and business conduct programmes – in order to be able to bid for work for the Ministry of Defence or armed forces?

View Question
Q63 NA/100

Are procurement requirements derived from a national defence and security strategy, and are procurement decisions well-audited? Are defence purchases based on clearly identified and quantified requirements?

View Question

Tender Solicitation, Assessment and Contract Award

Expand
Q64 NA/100

Is defence procurement generally conducted as open competition or is there a significant element of single-sourcing (that is, without competition)?

View Question
Q65 NA/100

Are tender boards subject to regulations and codes of conduct and are their decisions subject to independent audit to ensure due process and fairness?

View Question
Q66 NA/100

Does the country have legislation in place to discourage and punish collusion between bidders for defence and security contracts?

View Question

Contract Delivery and In-Service Support

Expand
Q67 NA/100

Are there mechanisms and procedures that ensure that contractors meet their obligations on reporting and delivery?

View Question
Q68 NA/100

Are there mechanisms in place to allow companies to complain about perceived malpractice in procurement, and are companies protected from discrimination when they use these mechanisms?

View Question
Q69 NA/100

What sanctions are used to punish the corrupt activities of a supplier?

View Question

Offset Contracts

Expand
Q70 NA/100

When negotiating offset contracts, does the government specifically address corruption risk by imposing anti-corruption due diligence on contractors and third parties?

View Question
Q71 NA/100

How does the government monitor offset contracts?

View Question
Q72 NA/100

What level of competition are offset contracts subject to?

View Question

Agents / Brokers

Expand
Q73 NA/100

How strongly does the government control the company’s use of agents and intermediaries in the procurement cycle?

View Question

Financing Package

Expand
Q74 NA/100

Are the principal aspects of the financing package surrounding major arms deals, (such as payment timelines, interest rates, commercial loans or export credit agreements) made publicly available prior to the signing of contracts?

View Question

Seller Influence

Expand
Q75 NA/100

How common is it for defence acquisition decisions to be based on political influence by selling nations?

View Question